The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways
Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 · Cited by 5,245
(1989) · doi:10.3362/9781780440149 · Cited by 590
Rethinking Communication in Innovation Processes: Creating Space for Change in Complex Systems
Leeuwis, C., & Aarts, N. (2011) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2011.536344 · Cited by 450
Self-citationNeef, A., & Neubert, D. (2011) · Agriculture and Human Values · doi:10.1007/s10460-010-9272-z · Cited by 278
Cited by
How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., Martin, G., Martin-Clouaire, R., Magne, M.-A., Justes, E., Journet, E.-P., Aubertot, J.-N., Savary, S., Bergez, J.-E., et al. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1 · Cited by 659
“According to this paradigm, farmers’ strategies and practices evolve along with research outputs and technologies developed by companies (Klerkx et al. 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialDesigning agroecological transitions; A review
Duru, M., Therond, O., & Fares, M. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x · Cited by 542
Klerkx, L., & Begemann, S. (2020) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901 · Cited by 354
Self-citationAgricultural transition: Niche and regime knowledge systems’ boundary dynamics
Ingram, J. (2018) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.05.001 · Cited by 134
Farming Systems Research: an approach to inquiry
Darnhofer, I., Gibbon, D., & Dedieu, B. (2012) · Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_1 · Cited by 129
The adopters versus the technology: which matters more when predicting or explaining adoption?
de Oca Munguia, O. M., & Llewellyn, R. (2020) · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy · doi:10.1002/aepp.13007 · Cited by 90
Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Rahman, I., & Noor, A. (2018) · World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development · doi:10.1108/wjstsd-11-2016-0062 · Cited by 78
Factors influencing dairy farmers’ adoption of best management grazing practices
Hyland, J. J., Heanue, K., McKillop, J., & Micha, E. (2018) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.006 · Cited by 73
Rossing, W. A. H., Albicette, M. M., Aguerre, V., Leoni, C., Ruggia, A., & Dogliotti, S. (2021) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103103 · Cited by 62
Farm Advisory Services and total factor productivity growth in the Irish dairy sector
Parikoglou, I., Emvalomatis, G., Thorne, F., & Wallace, M. (2023) · European Review of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/erae/jbac024 · Cited by 8
Amrago, E. C., Loughrey, J., Ryan, G., Crowley, F., & Doran, J. (2026) · Environmental and Sustainability Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.indic.2025.101064 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Klerkx, L., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C.
- Venue
- Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- Published
- 2012
- Pages
- 457-483
- OpenAlex
- W2102130439
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 106.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
