Cited by 284Marxism and Critical TheoryLogic and Philosophy of SciencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Models

Wartofsky, Marx W.·1979·Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-94-009-9357-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–284 of 284

Metadata

Authors
Wartofsky, M. W.
Corresponding author
Wartofsky, Marx W.
Venue
Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
Published
1979
ISSN
0068-0346 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4250826671
Cited by
284
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
FWCI
0.00
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Boston studies in the philosophy of science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
Keywords
philosophy of science, models, philosophy of biology, philosophy of physics, philosophy of mathematics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review