Cited by 774Environmental Impact and SustainabilityBioenergy crop production and managementWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies

The water footprint of bioenergy

Open access
Gerbens-Leenes, Winnie, Hoekstra, Arjen Y., van der Meer, Theo H.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

All energy scenarios show a shift toward an increased percentage of renewable energy sources, including biomass. This study gives an overview of water footprints (WFs) of bioenergy from 12 crops that currently contribute the most to global agricultural production: barley, cassava, maize, potato, rapeseed, rice, rye, sorghum, soybean, sugar beet, sugar cane, and wheat. In addition, this study includes jatropha, a suitable energy crop. Since climate and production circumstances differ among regions, calculations have been performed by country. The WF of bioelectricity is smaller than that of biofuels because it is more efficient to use total biomass (e.g., for electricity or heat) than a fraction of the crop (its sugar, starch, or oil content) for biofuel. The WF of bioethanol appears to be smaller than that of biodiesel. For electricity, sugar beet, maize, and sugar cane are the most favorable crops [50 m 3 /gigajoule (GJ)]. Rapeseed and jatropha, typical energy crops, are disadvantageous (400 m 3 /GJ). For ethanol, sugar beet, and potato (60 and 100 m 3 /GJ) are the most advantageous, followed by sugar cane (110 m 3 /GJ); sorghum (400 m 3 /GJ) is the most unfavorable. For biodiesel, soybean and rapeseed show to be the most favorable WF (400 m 3 /GJ); jatropha has an adverse WF (600 m 3 /GJ). When expressed per L, the WF ranges from 1,400 to 20,000 L of water per L of biofuel. If a shift toward a greater contribution of bioenergy to energy supply takes place, the results of this study can be used to select the crops and countries that produce bioenergy in the most water-efficient way.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0812619106

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algae grown in open ponds have water requirements per unit area similar to cotton or wheat, but less than corn, to replenish water lost in evaporation.

    “Perhaps surprisingly, algae grown in open ponds have water requirements per unit area similar to that of cotton or wheat, but less than that of corn, to replenish the water lost in evaporation (for an overview of water requirements of terrestrial plants used in biofuel production see [33]).”

    From Biofuels from algae: Challenges and potential (2010) · cites this paper as [33]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [1]Postel SL, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR. Human appropriation of renewable freshwater. Science. 1996;271:785–788. [Google Scholar]
  2. [4]United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2006 Revision, Highlights, Working Paper No. ESA/P/WP. Vol. 202. United Nations, New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division; 2007. [Google Scholar]
  3. [10]Minnesma M, Hisschemöller M. Biomass—A Signaling Perspective. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Inst Environ Stud, Free University; 2003. (in Dutch) [Google Scholar]
  4. [16]Fresco LO. Biomass for Food or Fuel: Is There a Dilemma? The Duisenberg Lecture, Singapore, September 17, 2006. The Netherlands: Rabobank; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  5. [18]Food and Agriculture Organization. Food Outlook. Global Market Analysis. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2008. [Accessed January 7, 2008]. Available at www.fao.org. [Google Scholar]
  6. [24]Food and Agriculture Organization. Introducing the International Bio-Energy Platform. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  7. [28]Food and Agriculture Organization. CROPWAT 4.3 Decision Support System. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2007. [Accessed January 12, 2007]. Available at www.fao.org/nr/water/infores_databases_cropwat.html. [Google Scholar]
  8. [31]Food and Agriculture Organization. Rome, Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization; 2008. [Accessed January 8, 2008]. FAOSTAT-Agriculture. Available at http://faostat.fao.org/site/339/default.aspx. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gerbens-Leenes, W., Hoekstra, A. Y., & van der Meer, T. H.
Affiliations
  • Department of Water Engineering and Management and
  • Laboratory of Thermal Engineering, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-06-23
Volume
106
Issue
25
Pages
10219-10223
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2140082872
Cited by
774
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 51 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 62
FWCI
59.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Keywords
water footprint, bioenergy, biofuels, bioelectricity, bioethanol, biodiesel, energy crops, Jatropha, crop water use, water efficiency, renewable energy, sugar beet, sugarcane, Brassica napus, soybean, maize, sorghum, potato, cassava, wheat, barley, rice, rye
MeSH terms
Ethanol, Electricity, Energy Metabolism, Energy-Generating Resources, Hot Temperature, Water, Crops, Agricultural

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review