Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9Technology Adoption and User BehaviourCultural Differences and ValuesMedia and Digital Communication

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Using Social Networking Sites: A Qualitative Cross-Cultural Comparison

Open access
Kalia, Prateek, Ben Dahmane Mouelhi, Norchene, Tebessi Hachana, Sana, Malek, Faten, Dahmen, Mehdi·2019·Communications in Computer and Information Science
DOI 10.1007/978-981-13-8300-7_23
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-981-13-8300-7_23

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 9

Metadata

Authors
Kalia, P., Ben Dahmane Mouelhi, N., Tebessi Hachana, S., Malek, F., & Dahmen, M.
Affiliations
  • Sant Baba Bhag Singh University (IN)
  • ESSCA School of Management (FR)
  • Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Kalia, Prateek
ORCID
Kalia, Prateek
Venue
Communications in Computer and Information Science
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published
2019
Pages
269-285
ISSN
  • 1865-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-0937
DOI
10.1007/978-981-13-8300-7_23
OpenAlex
W2946386343
Cited by
9
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.37
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Communications in computer and information science (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
Keywords
social networking sites, cross-cultural comparison, national cultural values, use motivation, barriers to use, cultural influence on communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.