Cited by 75Aging, Health, and DisabilityHealth and Well-being StudiesAging and Gerontology Research

Physical Illness and Depression in Older Adults: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Practice

Gail M. Williamson, David R. Shaffer, Patricia A. Parmelee·2000·The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/b107734

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williamson, G. M., Shaffer, D. R., & Parmelee, P. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Genesis HealthCare (US)
Venue
The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Springer US
Published
2000
ISSN
1568-2528 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4206232584
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.36
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Plenum series in social/clinical psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
physical illness, depression, older adults, aging, geriatric depression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review