Cited by 73Aging, Health, and DisabilityNursing care and researchHealth and Well-being Studies

Social support, social participation, & depression among caregivers and non-caregivers in Canada: a population health perspective

Sibalija, Jovana, Savundranayagam, Marie Y., Orange, J. B., Kloseck, Marita·2020·Aging & Mental Health

Abstract

Objectives: The study used data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging to investigate the relationships among social support (measured as affectionate support, emotional/informational support, positive social interaction, tangible support), social participation and depression in caregivers and non-caregivers.Method: Hierarchical multiple regression was used to investigate relationships among social support, social participation, and depression. Analyses of variance were used to examine differences in the means of social support, social participation, and depression between the two participant groups.Results: Higher levels of affectionate support, positive social interaction, and social participation were associated with lower depression scores. Social participation was a significant mediator of the relationship between caregiver status and depression. Caregivers reported significantly higher levels of affectionate support, emotional/informational support, positive social interaction, and social participation than non-caregivers. There were no between-group difference in depression scores.Discussion: The study provides support for the beneficial role of social participation in preserving caregiver mental health. Results are discussed in the context of policy and practice implications for caregivers in Canada.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/13607863.2018.1544223

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sibalija, J., Savundranayagam, M. Y., Orange, J. B., & Kloseck, M.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Sibalija, Jovana
Venue
Aging & Mental Health
Published
2018-12-06
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
765-773
ISSN
  • 1360-7863 (ISSN-L)
  • 1364-6915
OpenAlex
W2738947124
Cited by
73
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Aging & Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Western Graduate Research Scholarship
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
social support, social participation (health and rehabilitation), depression, caregivers, caregiver mental health, affectionate support, emotional and informational support, positive social interaction, tangible support, mediation, aging, Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
MeSH terms
Population Health, Canada, Depression, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Social Support, Caregivers, Social Participation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review