Cited by 827Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceSpatial and Panel Data AnalysisAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science

Linear mixed models for longitudinal data

Geert N. Verbeke, Geert Molenberghs·2000·Springer Series in Statistics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/b98969

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verbeke, G. N., & Molenberghs, G.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Transnational University Limburg (BE)
Venue
Springer Series in Statistics
Published
2000
OpenAlex
W4298221279
Cited by
818
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 59
FWCI
3.09
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Spatial and Panel Data Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Keywords
linear mixed models, longitudinal data, repeated measures, random effects, covariance structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review