Cited by 201Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Down's dyndrome and Alzheimer's disease: dendritic spine counts in the hippocampus

Ferrer, I., Gullotta, F.·1990·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

Samples of the hippocampus of four patients with Down's syndrome [two men aged 35 and 36 years with no evidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and two patients aged 47 and 55 years with associated AD] were obtained at post mortem and processed according to the rapid Golgi method. A significant reduction in the number of dendritic spines (DS) was found in the apical (middle, distal and oblique segments) and basilar (thick and thin segments) dendritic arbors of CA1 and CA2-3 pyramidal neurons in patients with Down's syndrome and no AD when compared to age-matched controls. An additional decrease of DS in every segment occurred in Down's patients with associated AD when compared to age-matched controls and Down's patients with no AD. In Down's syndrome (either associated or not to AD) thin basilar dendrites were the most severely involved; in AD patients CA1 pyramids were more severely affected than pyramidal neurons of the CA2-3 subfield.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00294247

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A decreased number of dendritic spines on pyramidal neurons were found in middle aged adults (47-55 years) with Down syndrome compared to age matched controls.

    “and middle aged adults (47–55 years) compared to age matched controls (Ferrer and Gullotta, 1990).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Ferrer and Gullotta, 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferrer, I., & Gullotta, F.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • University of Münster (DE)
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
1990-04
Volume
79
Issue
6
Pages
680-685
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2072480165
Cited by
201
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Down syndrome, Alzheimer's disease, dendritic spines, hippocampus, CA1 pyramidal neurons, Golgi staining, postmortem brain
MeSH terms
Adult, Alzheimer Disease, Cell Count, Dendrites, Down Syndrome, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review