The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The dependence of the conjunction fallacy on subtle linguistic factors
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
(1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477 · Cited by 8,240
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,851
Judgment under uncertainty: List of contributors
Kahneman, D. J., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cited by 4,670
Judgment under uncertainty: Causality and attribution
Kahneman, D. J., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Cited by 4,670
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982) · Judgment under Uncertainty · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477.015 · Cited by 1,476
The Conjunction Fallacy: A Task Specific Phenomenon?
Morier, D. M., & Borgida, E. (1984) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167284102010 · Cited by 186
Biased Questions in Judgment of Covariation Studies
Crocker, J. (1982) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167282082005 · Cited by 166
Conjunction errors: Evidence for multiple judgment procedures, including “signed summation”
Yates, J. F., & Carlson, B. W. (1986) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(86)90053-1 · Cited by 104
Mood and memory for tightly organized social information
Fiedler, K., Pampe, H., & Scherf, U. (1986) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420160204 · Cited by 94
Self-citationThe use of statistical, spatial‐temporal, and intensional information in judgments of contingency
Fielder, K., & Stroehm, W. (1986) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420160406 · Cited by 7
Cited by
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476
Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298
Probabilistic mental models: a Brunswikian theory of confidence
Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.98.4.506 · Cited by 1,506
Cosmides, L. (1996) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8 · Cited by 1,293
Metadata
- Authors
- Fiedler, K.
- Venue
- Psychological Research
- Published
- 1988-09
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-129
- ISSN
- 0033-3026 (ISSN-L)
- 0340-0727
- 1430-2772
- OpenAlex
- W2051381355
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 2.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
