Cited by 187Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersEpilepsy research and treatmentNeurological Complications and Syndromes

Transient loss of consciousness: the value of the history for distinguishing seizure from syncope

Hoefnagels, W. A. J., Padberg, G. W., Overweg, J., Velde, E. A., Roos, R. A. C.·1991·Journal of Neurology

Abstract

We studied 94 consecutive patients (age 15 or over) to investigate which aspects of the history and clinical findings help to distinguish seizures from syncope and related conditions. Clonic movements or automatism observed by an eyewitness classified an event as a seizure. The seizure group consisted of 41 patients and the syncope group of 53 patients. The likelihood ratio was used to calculate the predictive power of single findings and logistic regression to analyse combinations of findings. The best discriminatory finding was orientation immediately after the event according to the eyewitness and the age of the patient in the absence of an eyewitness report (P less than 0.001). We found a seizure five times more likely than syncope if the patient was disoriented after the event and three times more likely if the patient was less than 45 years of age. Nausea or sweating before the event were useful to exclude a seizure. Incontinence and trauma were not discriminative findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00319709

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Epilepsy and syncope may evoke one another on rare occasions, resulting in epileptic seizures triggering syncope as well as syncope triggering an epileptic seizure.

    “Epilepsy and syncope may evoke one another on rare occasions, resulting in epileptic seizures triggering syncope as well as syncope triggering an epileptic seizure.”
  • The results of interictal EEGs are normal in syncope.

    “The results of interictal EEGs are normal in syncope.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoefnagels, W. A. J., Padberg, G. W., Overweg, J., Velde, E. A., & Roos, R. A. C.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Neurology
Published
1991-02
Volume
238
Issue
1
Pages
39-43
ISSN
  • 0012-1037 (ISSN-L)
  • 0340-5354
  • 1432-1459
OpenAlex
W1998965401
Cited by
187
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
Keywords
transient loss of consciousness, seizures, syncope, differential diagnosis, medical history, eyewitness reports, clonic movements, likelihood ratios
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Consciousness, Diagnosis, Differential, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Syncope

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review