Cited by 97Survey Methodology and NonresponsePsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research Topics

Fall-off in the reporting of life events

Brown, George W., Harris, Tirril·1982·Social Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00583889

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, G. W., & Harris, T.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
Social Psychiatry
Published
1982
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
23-28
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 0037-7813
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W1977477971
Cited by
97
References
15
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
27.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
life events, recall period, investigator bias, retrospective reports, life event assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review