Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 258

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cluster analysis in community research: Epistemology and practice

Rapkin, Bruce D., Luke, Douglas A.·1993·American Journal of Community Psychology
DOI 10.1007/bf00941623
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cluster analysis refers to a family of methods for identifying cases with distinctive characteristics in heterogeneous samples and combining them into homogeneous groups. This approach provides a great deal of information about the types of cases and the distributions of variables in a sample. This paper considers cluster analysis as a quantitative complement to the traditional linear statistics that often characterize community psychology research. Cluster analysis emphasizes diversity rather than central tendency. This makes it a valuable tool for a wide range of familiar problems in community research. A number of these applications are considered here, including the assessment of change over time, network composition, network density, person‐setting relationships, and community diversity. A User's Guide section is included, which outlines the major decisions involved in a basic cluster analyses. Despite difficulties associated with the identification of optimal cluster solutions, carefully planned, theoretically informed application of cluster analysis has much to offer community researchers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00941623

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. 10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.456 · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.34.4.456 · Paper page
  2. Dixon W. J., 1990, BMDP statistical software manual
  3. 10.1177/0013164486463021 · doi:10.1177/0013164486463021
  4. Hartigan J., 1988, BMDP statistical software manual, 745
  5. Hudson H. C., 1982, Classifying social data
  6. Knoke D., 1982, Network analysis
  7. 10.1177/0013164487474010 · doi:10.1177/0013164487474010
  8. 10.1177/0013164490502010 · doi:10.1177/0013164490502010
  9. Luke D. A., 1990, The assessment of change in a mutual help context
  10. Ortiz B. Rapkin B. Mantell J. & Tross S. (1992).Transculturation as a determinant of sexual risk behavior in Latina immigrants to New York City. Paper presented at the Eight International Conference on the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) Amsterdam The Netherlands.
  11. 10.1007/BF00880776 · doi:10.1007/bf00880776
  12. 10.1037/h0076745 · doi:10.1037/h0076745
  13. 1985, SAS user's guides: Version 5 edition
  14. 10.1037/0033-295X.86.2.87 · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.2.87 · Paper page
  15. 1988, SPSSsupx user's guide
  16. Tabachnick B. G., 1989, Using multivariale statistics
  17. Wilkinson L., 1990, SYSTAT:: The system for statistics

Cited by

See all 258

Metadata

Authors
Rapkin, B. D., & Luke, D. A.
Venue
American Journal of Community Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
247-277
ISSN
  • 0091-0562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2770
DOI
10.1007/bf00941623
OpenAlex
W1989894849
Cited by
258
References
39
FWCI
6.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.