Cited by 435Psychometric Methodologies and TestingReliability and Agreement in MeasurementEducational Assessment and Pedagogy

DEMONSTRATING THE RELIABILITY THE DIFFERENCE SCORE IN THE MEASUREMENT OF CHANGE

ROGOSA, DAVID R., WILLETT, JOHN B.·1983·Journal of Educational Measurement

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1983.tb00211.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ROGOSA, D. R., & WILLETT, J. B.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
ROGOSA, DAVID R.
Venue
Journal of Educational Measurement
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1983-12
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
335-343
ISSN
  • 0022-0655 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-3984
OpenAlex
W2082962063
Cited by
435
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 16
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Measurement (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Keywords
difference scores, measurement of change, reliability statistics, repeated measures, test-retest reliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review