Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,017

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Learning Bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data

Open access
Heckerman, David, Geiger, Dan, Chickering, David M.·1995·Machine Learning

Abstract

We describe a Bayesian approach for learning Bayesian networks from a combination of prior knowledge and statistical data. First and foremost, we develop a methodology for assessing informative priors needed for learning. Our approach is derived from a set of assumptions made previously as well as the assumption oflikelihood equivalence, which says that data should not help to discriminate network structures that represent the same assertions of conditional independence. We show that likelihood equivalence when combined with previously made assumptions implies that the user's priors for network parameters can be encoded in a single Bayesian network for the next case to be seen—aprior network—and a single measure of confidence for that network. Second, using these priors, we show how to compute the relative posterior probabilities of network structures given data. Third, we describe search methods for identifying network structures with high posterior probabilities. We describe polynomial algorithms for finding the highest-scoring network structures in the special case where every node has at mostk=1 parent. For the general case (k>1), which is NP-hard, we review heuristic search algorithms including local search, iterative local search, and simulated annealing. Finally, we describe a methodology for evaluating Bayesian-network learning algorithms, and apply this approach to a comparison of various approaches.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00994016

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 46

  1. Aczel, J. (1966).Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications. Academic Press, New York.
  2. Beinlich, I., Suermondt, H., Chavez, R., & Cooper, G. (1989). The ALARM monitoring system: A case study with two probabilistic inference techniques for belief networks. InProceedings of the Second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine London: Springer Verlag, Berlin.
  3. Buntine, W. (1991). Theory refinement on Bayesian networks. InProceedings of Seventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, CA, pages 52?60. Morgan Kaufmann. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Camerini, P. & Maffioli, L. F. F. (1980). Thek best spanning arborescences of a network.Networks 10:91?110. · DOI
  5. Chickering, D. (1995a). A transformational characterization of equivalent Bayesian-network structures. InProceedings of Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, QU, pages 87?98. Morgan Kaufmann.
  6. Chickering, D. (March, 1995b). Search operators for learning equivalence classes of Bayesian- network structures. Technical Report R231, Cognitive Systems Laboratory, University of California, Los Angeles.
  7. Chickering, D., Geiger, D., & Heckerman, D. (1995). Learning Bayesian networks: Search methods and experimental results. InProceedings of Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, pages 112?128. Society for Artificial Intelligence in Statistics.
  8. Chow, C. & Liu, C. (1968). Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 14:462?467. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cooper, G. & Herskovits, E. (1992). A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data.Machine Learning 9:309?347.
  10. Dawid, A. & Lauritzen, S. (1993). Hyper Markov laws in the statistical analysis of decomposable graphical models.Annals of Statistics 21:1272?1317. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Druzdzel, M. & Simon, H. (1993). Causality in Bayesian belief networks. InProceedings of Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, pages 3?11. Morgan Kaufmann. · DOI
  12. Edmonds, J. (1967). Optimum brachching.J. Res. NBS 71B:233?240.
  13. Evans, J. & Minieka, E. (1991).Optimization algorithms for networks and graphs. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York.
  14. Gabow, H. (1977). Siam journal of computing.Networks 6:139?150.
  15. Gabow, H., Galil, Z., & Spencer, T. (1984). Efficient implementation of graph algorithms using contraction. InProceedings of FOCS. · DOI
  16. Geiger, D. & Heckerman, D. (1994). Learning Gaussian networks. InProceedings of Tenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Seattle, WA, pages 235?243. Morgan Kaufmann. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Geiger, D. & Heckerman, D. (1995). A characterization of the Dirichlet distribution with application to learning Bayesian networks. InProceedings of Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, QU, pages 196?207. Morgan Kaufmann.
  18. Good, I. (1965).The Estimation of Probabilities. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  19. Heckerman, D. (1995). A Bayesian approach for learning causal networks. InProceedings of Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, QU, pages 285?295, Morgan Kaufmann.
  20. Heckerman, D. & Geiger, D. (1995). Learning Bayesian networks: A unification for discrete and Gaussian domains. InProceedings of Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, QU, pages 274?284. Morgan Kaufmann.
  21. Heckerman, D. & Nathwani, B. (1992). An evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Pathfinder.Computers and Biomedical Research 25:56?74. · DOI
  22. Heckerman, D. & Shachter, R. (1995). A definition and graphical representation of causality. InProceedings of Eleventh Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, QU, pages 262?273. Morgan Kaufmann.
  23. Höffgen, K. (revised 1993). Learning and robust learning of product distributions. Technical Report 464, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Dortmund. · DOI
  24. Horvitz, E. (1987). Reasoning about beliefs and actions under computational resource constraints. InProceedings of the Third Workshop on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence Seattle, WA, Association for Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Mountain View, CA. Also in Kanal, L., Levitt, T., and Lemmer, J., editors,Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 3, pages 301?324. North-Holland, New York, 1989.
  25. Howard, R. (1988). Uncertainty about probability: A decision-analysis perspective.Risk Analysis 8:91?98. · DOI
  26. Howard, R. & Matheson, J. (1981). Influence diagrams. In Howard, R. and Matheson, J., editors,Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, volume II, pages 721?762. Strategic Decisions Group, Menlo Park, CA.
  27. Johnson (1985). How fast is local search? InFOCS, pages 39?42. · DOI
  28. Karp, R. (1971). A simple derivation of Edmond's algorithm for optimal branchings.Networks 1:265?272. · DOI
  29. Korf, R. (1993). Linear-space best-first search.Artificial Intelligence 62:41?78. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kullback, S. & Leibler, R. (1951). Information and sufficiency.Ann. Math. Statistics 22:79?86. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kyburg, H. & Smokler, H. (1964).Studies in Subjective Probability. Wiley and Sons, New York.
  32. Lam, W. & Bacchus, F. (1993). Using causal information and local measures to learn Bayesian networks. InProceedings of Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, pages 243?250. Morgan Kaufmann. · DOI
  33. Lauritzen, S. (1982).Lectures on Contingency Tables. University of Aalborg Press, Aalborg, Denmark.
  34. Matzkevich, I. & Abramson, B. (1993). Deriving a minimal I-map of a belief network relative to a target ordering of its nodes. InProceedings of Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, pages 159?165. Morgan Kaufmann.
  35. Pearl, J. (1988).Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, CA.
  36. Pearl, J. & Verma, T. (1991). A theory of inferred causation. In Allen, J., Fikes, R., and Sandewall, E., editors,Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Second International Conference pages 441?452. Morgan Kaufmann, New York.
  37. Spiegelhalter, D., Dawid, A., Lauritzen, S., & Cowell, R. (1993). Bayesian analysis in expert systems.Statistical Science, 8:219?282. · DOI · Paper page
  38. Spiegelhalter, D. & Lauritzen, S. (1990). Sequential updating of conditional probabilities on directed graphical structures.Networks, 20:579?605. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (1993).Causation, Prediction, and Search. Springer-Verlag, New York. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Spirtes, P. & Meek, C. (1995). Learning Bayesian networks with discrete variables from data. InProceedings of First International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Montreal, QU. Morgan Kaufmann.
  41. Suzuki, J. (1993). A construction of Bayesian networks from databases based on an MDL scheme. InProceedings of Ninth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, pages 266?273. Morgan Kaufmann.
  42. Tarjan, R. (1977). Finding optimal branchings.Networks, 7:25?35. · DOI · Paper page
  43. Titterington, D. (1976). Updating a diagnostic system using unconfirmed cases.Applied Statistics, 25:238?247. · DOI
  44. Verma, T. & Pearl, J. (1990). Equivalence and synthesis of causal models. InProceedings of Sixth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Boston, MA, pages 220?227. Morgan Kaufmann.
  45. Winkler, R. (1967). The assessment of prior distributions in Bayesian analysis.American Statistical Association Journal, 62:776?800. · DOI · Paper page
  46. York, J. (1992).Bayesian methods for the analysis of misclassified or incomplete multivariate discrete data. PhD thesis. Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle.

Cited by

See all 2,017

Metadata

Authors
Heckerman, D., Geiger, D., & Chickering, D. M.
Venue
Machine Learning
Published
1995-09
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
197-243
ISSN
  • 0885-6125 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0565
OpenAlex
W1517993545
Cited by
2,017
References
4
FWCI
27.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning Bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00994016
The paper
Heckerman, D., Geiger, D., & Chickering, D. M. (1995). Learning Bayesian networks: The combination of knowledge and statistical data. Machine Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00994016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.