Cited by 36Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Evaluation of the pulse wave arrival time as a marker for blood pressure changes in critically ill infants and children

Wippermann, Carl F., Schranz, Dietmar, Huth, Ralph G.·1995·Journal of Clinical Monitoring

Abstract

Objective Pulse arrival time (PAT), which is the interval between the R wave of the electrocardiogram (ECG) and the arrival of the pulse wave peripherally, has been reported to be suitable for use as an indirect measure of blood pressure change. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in critically ill infants and children, the degree to which 1/PAT covaries with systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure, as well as heart rate.Methods A laboratory device was used to calculate PAT in real time from the ECG and the plethysmographic curve of pulse oximetry used for routine monitoring. Calculated PAT and corresponding blood pressures and heart rate were stored on hard disk. A total of 15 critically ill patients, aged 6 days to 16 years, weighing 3 to 80 kg, were studied.Results In all patients, one period of 11,000 to 36,000 beats could be evaluated. Mean correlation coefficients were best for systolic blood pressure (r = 0.73), followed by mean blood pressure (r = 0.68) and diastolic blood pressure (r = 0.61), and, finally, heart rate (r = 0.52). In 7 patients, the correlation coefficient for systolic blood pressure was > 0.9; but, in 4 patients, it was < 0.5.Conclusions We conclude that the correlation between 1/PAT and systolic blood pressure is not strong enough to serve as a marker for blood pressure changes in critically ill infants and children. This may be due to changes of the preejection period, which is part of the PAT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01616991

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wippermann, C. F., Schranz, D., & Huth, R. G.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Monitoring
Published
1995-09
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
324-328
ISSN
0748-1977 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046977157
Cited by
36
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
blood pressure monitoring, critically ill infants, critically ill children, systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, pre-ejection period, hemodynamic monitoring
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Blood Pressure, Child, Child, Preschool, Diastole, Heart Rate, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Pulse, Systole, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review