Cited by 51Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemodynamic Monitoring and TherapyClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

A clinical evaluation of the accuracy of the Nellcor N-100 and Ohmeda 3700 pulse oximeters

Cecil, William T., Thorpe, Kevin J., Fibuch, Eugene E., Tuohy, Gerald F.·1988·Journal of Clinical Monitoring

Abstract

Two pulse oximeters, the Nellcor N-100 and the Ohmeda 3700, were compared with arterial blood values and with each other in a clinical evaluation of performance. Three hundred twenty-nine simultaneously sampled blood/oximeter data pairs from use of both makes of pulse oximeters on each of 152 test subjects were included in the comparison analysis for each oximeter. Among the patients, disease type and severity and hospital location varied widely. Basic descriptive statistics and linear regression analysis were employed to facilitate comparison. Both oximeters displayed a statistically significant but clinically insignificant bias when compared with arterial blood oxyhemoglobin: -0.31 (P = 0.023) and 0.59 (P = 0.001) for the Ohmeda 3700 pulse oximeter and the Nellcor N-100 pulse oximeter, respectively. Relative to arterial blood oxyhemoglobin, the 95% tolerance intervals were +4.84 to -5.45 (10.3) for the Ohmeda 3700 and +6.94 to -5.76 (12.7) for the Nellcor N-100. Regressed against [oxyhemoglobin + carboxyhemoglobin + methemoglobin] as x, the Nellcor N-100 read y = 0.85(x) + 12.5, r = 0.83, P less than 0.0001, and the Ohmeda 3700 read y = 1.02(x) - 5.3, r = 0.86, P less than 0.0001.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01618105

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 9 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Shippy MB, Petterson MT, Whitman RA, Shivers CR. A clinical evaluation of the BTI Biox II ear oximeter. Respir Care 1984;29:730-735
  2. Cecil WT, Petterson MT, Lamoonpun S, Rudolph CD. Clinical evaluation of the Ohmeda Biox IIA ear oximeter in the critical care environment. Respir Care 1985;30:179- 183
  3. Cecil WT, Morrison LS, Lamoonpun S. Clinical evalua- tion of the Ohmeda Biox III pulse oximeter: a comparison of finger and ear cuvettes. Respir Care 1985;30:840-845
  4. Severinghaus JW. Discussion II. In: Payne JP, Severing- haus JW, eds. Pulse oximetry. London: Springer-Verlag 1986:45-53

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cecil, W. T., Thorpe, K. J., Fibuch, E. E., & Tuohy, G. F.
Affiliations
Saint Luke's Hospital (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Monitoring
Published
1988-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
31-36
ISSN
  • 1387-1307 (ISSN-L)
  • 0748-1977
  • 1573-2614
OpenAlex
W2006936900
Cited by
51
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
pulse oximetry, arterial oxygen saturation, oxyhemoglobin, carboxyhemoglobin, methemoglobin, measurement bias, tolerance intervals, device comparison
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Monitoring, Physiologic, Oximetry, Regression Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review