Cited by 221Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesOcular Infections and Treatments

Multicenter randomized trial of fluconazole versus amphotericin B for treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic patients

Phillips, P., Shafran, S., Garber, G., Rotstein, C., Smaill, F., Fong, I., Salit, I., Miller, M. +5 more·1997·European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases

Abstract

A randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of fluconazole versus that of amphotericin B in the treatment of candidemia in non-neutropenic adults. Enrollment was stratified by disease severity (APACHE II score). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive amphotericin B 0.6 mg/kg/day (cumulative dose 8 mg/kg) or fluconazole 800 mg intravenous loading dose, then 400 mg daily for four weeks (intravenous for at least 10 days). Patients were monitored for six months. A total of 106 patients were enrolled. A protocol amendment implemented midway through the trial required patients to be removed from the study and treated with amphotericin B if species identification indicated candidemia due to Candida glabrata or Candida krusei. Baseline characteristics were similar for the two groups; 103 patients (fluconazole, 50; amphotericin B, 53) met the major enrollment criteria. The intention-to-treat analysis indicated successful therapy in 50% of fluconazole recipients compared to 58% of the amphotericin B group (p = 0.39; one-sided 95% CI, -8 to 24%). The efficacy analysis included 84 patients (fluconazole, 42; amphotericin B, 42); successful outcomes were observed in 57% and 62% of cases in the fluconazole and amphotericin B groups, respectively (p = 0.66: one-sided 95% CI, -12 to 22%). The mortality at day 14 for the fluconazole group was 26% and for the amphotericin B group 21% (p = 0.52; chi-square test) and remained similar throughout the course of follow-up, Drug-related adverse events were more frequent with amphotericin B than with fluconazole and prompted switching of therapy for two (4%) and zero cases, respectively. Fluconazole and amphotericin B were associated with similar clinical response rates and survival in the treatment of candidemia among non-neutropenic patients; however, drug-related adverse events were more frequent with amphotericin B.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01726360

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two large randomized studies and 2 large observational studies have demonstrated that fluconazole (400 mg/day) and amphotericin B deoxycholate (0.5-0.6 mg/kg per day) are similarly effective as therapy.

    “Two large randomized studies [105, 106] and 2 large observational studies [107, 108] have demonstrated that fluconazole (400 mg/day) and amphotericin B deoxycholate (0.5-0.6 mg/kg per day) are similarly effective as therapy.”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [106]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Phillips, P., Shafran, S., Garber, G., Rotstein, C., Smaill, F., Fong, I., Salit, I., Miller, M., Williams, K., Conly, J. M., Singer, J., Ioannou, S., & for the Canadian Candidemia Study Group
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • Juravinski Hospital (CA)
  • McMaster University Medical Centre (CA)
  • St. Michael's Hospital (CA)
  • Toronto General Hospital (CA)
  • Jewish General Hospital (CA)
  • Royal University Hospital (CA)
  • Pfizer (Canada) (CA)
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Published
1997-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
337-345
ISSN
  • 0934-9723 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-4373
OpenAlex
W1971099675
Cited by
221
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Alberta
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Infections and Treatments
Keywords
candidemia, fluconazole, amphotericin B, non-neutropenic patients, antifungal therapy, Candida glabrata, Candida krusei, drug-related adverse events, mortality, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Female, Humans, Immunocompetence, Male, Middle Aged, Fluconazole, Survival Rate, Confidence Intervals, Fungemia, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review