Cited by 521Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesNeutropenia and Cancer Infections

Voriconazole versus a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial

Kullberg, BJ, Sobel, JD, Ruhnke, M, Pappas, PG, Viscoli, C, Rex, JH, Cleary, JD, Rubinstein, E +6 more·2005·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Voriconazole has proven efficacy against invasive aspergillosis and oesophageal candidiasis. This multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority study compared voriconazole with a regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for the treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients.Methods Non-neutropenic patients with a positive blood culture for a species of candida and clinical evidence of infection were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, either voriconazole (n=283) or amphotericin B followed by fluconazole (n=139). The primary efficacy analysis was based on clinical and mycological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment, assessed by an independent data-review committee unaware of treatment assignment.Findings Of 422 patients randomised, 370 were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. Voriconazole was non-inferior to amphotericin B/fluconazole in the primary efficacy analysis, with successful outcomes in 41% of patients in both treatment groups (95% CI for difference -10.6% to 10.6%). At the last evaluable assessment, outcome was successful in 162 (65%) patients assigned voriconazole and 87 (71%) assigned amphotericin B/fluconazole (p=0.25). Voriconazole cleared blood cultures as quickly as amphotericin B/fluconazole (median time to negative blood culture, 2.0 days). Treatment discontinuations due to all-cause adverse events were more frequent in the voriconazole group, although most discontinuations were due to non-drug-related events and there were significantly fewer serious adverse events and cases of renal toxicity than in the amphotericin B/fluconazole group.Interpretation Voriconazole was as effective as the regimen of amphotericin B followed by fluconazole in the treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, and with fewer toxic effects.Relevance to practice There are several options for treatment of candidaemia in non-neutropenic patients, including amphotericin B, fluconazole, voriconazole, and echinocandins. Voriconazole can be given both as initial intravenous treatment and as an oral stepdown agent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67490-9

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 1 study, patients were allowed to step down to oral fluconazole therapy in as few as 3 to 7 days after intravenous therapy with amphotericin.

    “In 1 study, patients were allowed to step down to oral fluconazole therapy in as few as 3 to 7 days after intravenous therapy with amphotericin.”
  • Voriconazole was as effective as amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for the treatment of candidemia.

    “Voriconazole, a broad spectrum triazole active against filamentous fungi as well as Candida species, was as effective as amphotericin B followed by fluconazole for the treatment of candidemia [29].”

    From Treatment of Invasive Candidiasis: A Narrative Review (2018) · cites this paper as [29]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kullberg, B., Sobel, J., Ruhnke, M., Pappas, P., Viscoli, C., Rex, J., Cleary, J., Rubinstein, E., Church, L., Brown, J., Schlamm, H., Oborska, I., Hilton, F., & Hodges, M.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
  • Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kullberg, BJ
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
366
Issue
9495
Pages
1435-1442
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2104218588
Cited by
521
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 35
FWCI
36.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
Keywords
candidemia, voriconazole, amphotericin B, fluconazole, non-neutropenic patients, antifungal therapy, non-inferiority, nephrotoxicity, adverse events, echinocandins, invasive candidiasis, oral step-down therapy, echinocandin resistance
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Candidiasis, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pyrimidines, Triazoles, Fluconazole, Treatment Outcome, APACHE, Voriconazole

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review