Cited by 234Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

Carbon and nitrogen turnover in adjacent grassland and cropland ecosystems

Schimel, David S.·1986·Biogeochemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02180325

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schimel, D. S.
Affiliations
Colorado State University (US)
Corresponding author
Schimel, David S.
Venue
Biogeochemistry
Published
1986-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
345-357
ISSN
  • 0168-2563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-515X
OpenAlex
W2081287715
Cited by
234
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
8.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Biogeochemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
carbon turnover, nitrogen turnover, grassland soils, agricultural soils, soil nitrogen mineralization, nitrogen immobilization, soil CO2 evolution, cultivation effects, soil texture, clay content, nitrogen limitation, carbon limitation, 15N isotope dilution, soil microbes, nitrogen loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review