Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in relation to ammonification and nitrification rates in organic and conventional cropping systems
Abstract
Agricultural systems that receive high or low organic matter (OM) inputs would be expected to differ in soil nitrogen (N) transformation rates and fates of ammonium (NH4+) and nitrate (NO3-). To compare NH4+ availability, competition between nitrifiers and heterotrophic microorganisms for NH4+, and microbial NO3- assimilation in an organic vs. a conventional irrigated cropping system in the California Central Valley, chemical and biological soil assays, 15N isotope pool dilution and 15N tracer techniques were used. Potentially mineralizable N (PMN) and hot minus cold KCl-extracted NH4+ as indicators of soil N supplying capacity were measured five times during the tomato growing season. At mid-season, rates of gross ammonification and gross nitrification after rewetting dry soil were measured in microcosms. Microbial immobilization of NO3- and NH4+ was estimated based on the uptake of 15N and gross consumption rates. Gross ammonification, PMN, and hot minus cold KCl-extracted NH4+ were approximately twice as high in the organically than the conventionally managed soil. Net estimated microbial NO3- assimilation rates were between 32 and 35% of gross nitrification rates in the conventional and between 37 and 46% in the organic system. In both soils, microbes assimilated more NO3- than NH4+. Heterotrophic microbes assimilated less NH4+ than NO3- probably because NH4+ concentrations were low and competition by nitrifiers was apparently strong. The high OM input organic system released NH4+ in a gradual manner and, compared to the low OM input conventional system, supported a more active microbial biomass with greater N demand that was met mainly by NO3- immobilization.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The observed NO3- mitigation might be a result of outcompeting nitrifiers and denitrifiers by zymogenous N immobilizers, as indicated by the data.
“The observed NO3- mitigation might be a result of outcompeting nitrifiers and denitrifiers by zymogenous N immobilizers (Burger and Jackson, 2003), as indicated by our data (Figure 3).”
From Potential of Wheat Straw, Spruce Sawdust, and Lignin as High Organic Carbon Soil Amendments to Improve Agricultural Nitrogen Retention Capacity: An Incubation Study (2018) · cites this paper as Burger and Jackson, 2003
Only HCA with high C availability, such as wheat straw, temporarily tend to reduce nitrification-derived N2O emissions by increasing the microbial competition of N2O-producers with fast growing microorganisms with large N immobilization rates.
“Thus, only HCA with high C availability, such as wheat straw, temporarily tend to reduce nitrification-derived N2O emissions (Figure 2G) by increasing the microbial competition of N2O-producers with fast growing microorganisms with large N immobilization rates (Burger and Jackson, 2003).”
From Potential of Wheat Straw, Spruce Sawdust, and Lignin as High Organic Carbon Soil Amendments to Improve Agricultural Nitrogen Retention Capacity: An Incubation Study (2018) · cites this paper as Burger and Jackson, 2003
Cites
Carbon and nitrogen turnover in adjacent grassland and cropland ecosystems
Schimel, D. S. (1986) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/bf02180325 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511 · see citing works
The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: a review
Agegnehu, G., Srivastava, A. K., & Bird, M. I. (2017) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.06.008 · Cited by 928 · see citing works
Steiner, C., Glaser, B., Geraldes Teixeira, W., Lehmann, J., Blum, W. E. H., & Zech, W. (2008) · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science · doi:10.1002/jpln.200625199 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Aguilera, E., Lassaletta, L., Sanz-Cobena, A., Garnier, J., & Vallejo, A. (2013) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.09.006 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
“, 2006; Steenwerth and Belina, 2010), the immobilization of NO3− by a larger microbial biomass (Burger and Jackson, 2003), or the capture of N in the SOM which is built up by the addition of organic matter.”
BackgroundBiochar and Manure Affect Calcareous Soil and Corn Silage Nutrient Concentrations and Uptake
Lentz, R. D., & Ippolito, J. A. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0126 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Ducey, T. F., Ippolito, J. A., Cantrell, K. B., Novak, J. M., & Lentz, R. D. (2013) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.01.006 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Cheng, Y., Cai, Z.-C., Chang, S. X., Wang, J., & Zhang, J.-B. (2012) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-012-0687-0 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Reichel, R., Wei, J., Islam, M. S., Schmid, C., Wissel, H., Schröder, P., Schloter, M., & Brüggemann, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00900 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
“The observed NO3− mitigation might be a result of outcompeting nitrifiers and denitrifiers by zymogenous N immobilizers (Burger and Jackson, 2003), as indicated by our data (Figure 3).”
BackgroundGorfer, M., Blumhoff, M., Klaubauf, S., Urban, A., Inselsbacher, E., Bandian, D., Mitter, B., Sessitsch, A., Wanek, W., & Strauss, J. (2011) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2011.53 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Schouten, S., van Groenigen, J. W., Oenema, O., & Cayuela, M. L. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01163.x · Cited by 67 · see citing works
- Authors
- Burger, M., & Jackson, L. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Burger, Martin
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-36
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106629735
- Cited by
- 472
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- University of California, Davis
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Keywords
- microbial immobilization, ammonium, nitrate, ammonification, nitrification, organic production systems, conventional cropping systems, soil organic matter, soil nitrogen transformation, 15N tracer, potentially mineralizable nitrogen, microbial biomass, tomato, irrigated agriculture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review