Cited by 119Bioenergy crop production and managementSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

The contribution of switchgrass in reducing GHG emissions

Open access
Monti, Andrea, Barbanti, Lorenzo, Zatta, Alessandro, Zegada‐Lizarazu, Walter·2012·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

The contribution of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), a perennial C 4 grass, in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions was reviewed under three main areas; the impact on carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N 2 O), and methane emissions (CH4), whilst also taking into account the effects of land conversion to switchgrass. Switchgrass is able to enhance biomass accumulation in a wide range of environmental conditions, which is the premise for considerable carbon assimilation and storage in the belowground organs. The progress in some areas of crop husbandry (e.g., tillage and fertilization) has fostered benefits for carbon storage, while restraining GHG emissions. As root biomass is the main indicator of soil carbon sequestration, switchgrass's dense and deep rooting is a relevant advantage, although uncertainty still exists about the crop's belowground biomass accumulation. In agreement with this, most LCA studies addressing CO2 emissions report significant benefits from switchgrass cultivation and processing. Beside CO2, switchgrass performed better than most other biomass crops also in terms of N 2 O emission. In the case of CH4 emission, it may be argued that switchgrass should act as a moderate sink, i.e., contributing to mitigate CH4 atmospheric concentration, but a substantial lack of information indicates the need for specific research on the topic. Land conversion to switchgrass is the latest issue which needs to be addressed in LCA studies: not surprisingly, the net CO2 abatement appears remarkable if switchgrass is grown in former arable lands, although it is slightly negative to positive if switchgrass replaces permanent grassland. In conclusion, switchgrass could significantly contribute to mitigate GHG emissions, although areas of uncertainty still exist in the assessment of soil carbon storage, N 2 O and CH4 emissions, and the effects of converting lands to switchgrass. Further improvements must, therefore, be achieved to strengthen the crop's remarkable sustainability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01142.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most analyses of cellulosic ethanol reported significant reductions in life-cycle GHG emissions when compared with baseline gasoline, with reductions of 63% to 118% reported.

    “On the other hand, most analyses of cellulosic ethanol reported significant reductions in life-cycle GHG emissions when compared with those from baseline gasoline. Reductions of 63% to 118% have been reported (Borrion et al 2012, MacLean and Spatari 2009, Monti et al 2012, Mu et al 2010, Scown et al 2012, Wang et al 2011a, Whitaker et al 2010).”

    From Well-to-wheels energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of ethanol from corn, sugarcane and cellulosic biomass for US use (2012) · cites this paper as Monti et al 2012

    Table 3 (labelled Conclusions in our copy) reports 63–118% life-cycle GHG savings for switchgrass bioethanol compared with gasoline, and the life-cycle emissions section says the literature generally finds significant benefits from switchgrass. The paper reviews switchgrass specifically, so it does not establish that most analyses of cellulosic ethanol across feedstocks find such reductions. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Our results for cellulosic ethanol are in line with two recent studies that reported life-cycle GHG emissions of switchgrass and miscanthus ethanol.

    “Our results for cellulosic ethanol are in line with two recent studies that reported life-cycle GHG emissions of switchgrass and miscanthus ethanol.”
  • PECs can allocate high amounts of atmospheric C in belowground biomass (BGB) thanks to deep and dense fine rooting systems.

    “PECs can allocate high amounts of atmospheric C in the belowground biomass (BGB; Chimento & Amaducci, 2015; Monti et al., 2012; Monti & Zatta, 2009) thanks to the deep and dense fine rooting systems (Chimento & Amaducci, 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Bai Y, Luo L, van der Voet E (2010) Life cycle assessment of switchgrass-derived eth- anol as transport fuel. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 468-477.
  2. Bowden R, Wayman S, Ernst CL, Mitchell R (2010) Aboveground and belowground biomass and nitrogen retranslocation in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum). Proc. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA 2010 Int. Annual Meeting, Oct. 31 -Nov. 4, Long Beach, CA. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
  3. Bransby DI, McLaughlin SB, Parrish DJ (1998) A review of carbon and N balances in switchgrass grown for energy. Biomass Bioenergy, 14, 379-384.
  4. Burton DL, Zebarth BJ, Gillam KM, MacLeod JM (2008) Effect of split application of fertilizer nitrogen on N2O emissions from potatoes. Canadian Journal of Soil Sci- ence, 88, 229-239.
  5. Chan ASK, Parkin TB (2001) Effect of land use on methane flux from soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 786-797.
  6. Cherubini F, Jungmeier G (2010) LCA of a biorefinery concept producing bioethanol, bioenergy, and chemicals from switchgrass. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 53-66.
  7. Dutaur L, Verchot LV (2007) A glozrbal inventory of the soil CH 4 sink. Global Biogeo- chemestry Cycles, 21, GB4013, doi: 10.1029/2006GB002734. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Fawcett AA, Sands RD (2006) Non-CO2 greenhouse gases in the second genera- tion model. Multi-greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy. Energy Journal, 3, 305-322.
  9. Follett RF, Kimble JM, Lal R (2001) The potential of U.S. grazing lands to sequester soil carbon. In: The Potential of U.S. Grazing Lands to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect (eds Follett RF, Kimble JM, Lal R), pp. 401-430.
  10. Fujino J, Nair R, Kainuma M, Masui T, Matsuoka Y (2006) Multigas mitigation anal- ysis on stabilization scenarios using AIM global model. Multi-greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy. Energy Journal, 3, 343-354.
  11. Garten CT, Wullschleger SD (1999) Soil carbon inventories under a bioenergy crop (Switchgrass): measurement limitations. Journal of Environmental Quality, 28, 1359-1365.
  12. Gebhart DL, Johnson HB, Mayeux HS, Polley HWJ (1994) The CRP increases soil organic carbon. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 49, 488-492.
  13. Hall DO, Scurlock JMO (1991) Tropical grasslands and their role in the global carbon cycle. In: Modern Ecology: Basic and Applied Aspects. (eds Esser G, Overdieck D), pp. 659-678. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  14. Heaton E, Voigt T, Long SP (2004) A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass and Bioenergy, 27, 21-30.
  15. Kemfert C, Truong TP, Bruckner T (2006) Economic impact assessment of climate change-A multi-gas investigation with WIAGEMGTAPEL-ICM. Multi-greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy. Energy Journal, 3, 375-389.
  16. Kim DG, Isenhart TM, Parkin TB, Schultz RC, Loynachan TE (2010) Methane flux in cropland and adjacent riparian buffers with different vegetation covers. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 786-797.
  17. KimS , Dale BR (2004) Cumulative energy and global warming impact from the production of biomass for biobased products. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 7, 147-162.
  18. Lal R (2003) Global potential of soil carbon sequestration to mitigate the greenhouse effect. Critical Review on Plant Science, 22, 151-184.
  19. Luo L, va der Voet E, Huppes G (2010) Energy and environmental performance of bioethazrnol from different lignocelluloses. International Journal of Chemical Engi- neering, 2010, 1-12, article ID 740962.
  20. McLaughlin SB (1993) New switchgrass biofuels research program for the southeast. In: Proc. Annual Automotive Technol. Dev. Conhactor's Coordinating Meeting, 2-5 November 1992, Dearborn, MI, pp. 111-115. Society of Automotive Engi- neers, Warrendale Marshall, PA, USA.
  21. Mehdi B, Zan C, Girouard P, Samson R (1999) Soil organic carbon sequestration under two dedicated perennial bioenergy crops. In: Biomass: A Growth Opportu- nity in Green Energy Andvalue-Added Products. Proc. 4th Biomass Conference of the Americas, Vol 1. Oakland, California. 29 August-2 September, 1999, pp. 17-23. Pergamon, Oxford, UK.
  22. Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (2007) Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 852 p.
  23. Monti A, Fazio S, Venturi G (2009) Cradle-to-farm gate life cycle assessment in perennial energy crops. European Journal of Agronomy, 31, 77-84.
  24. Muir JP, Sanderson MA, Ocumpaugh WR, Jones RM, Reed RL (2001) Biomass pro- duction of 'Alamo' switchgrass in response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and row spacing. Agronomy Journal, 93, 896-901.
  25. Reicosky DC (2003) Tillage-induced CO2 emissions and carbon sequestration: effect of secondary tillage and compaction. In: Conservation Agriculture. (eds Garcia-Tor- res L, Benites J, Martinez-Vilela A, Holgado-Cabrera A), pp. 291-300. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.
  26. Sanderson MA (2008) Upland switchgrass yield, nutritive value, and soil carbon changes under grazing and clipping. Agronomy Journal, 100, 510-516.
  27. Sanderson MA, Read JC, Reed RL (1999) Harvest management of switchgrass for biomass feedstock and forage production. Agronomy Journal, 91, 5-10.
  28. Schlesinger WH (1997) Biogeochemistry: An Analysis of Global Change. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  29. Searchinger TD (2010) Biofuels and the need for additional carbon. Environmental Research Letters 5, 024007, doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024007. · DOI
  30. Smith SJ, Wigley TML (2006) Multi-gas forcing stabilization with the miniCAM. Multi-greenhouse gas mitigation and climate policy. Energy Journal, 3, 373-391.
  31. Smith P, Martino D, Cai Z, Gwary D, Janzen HH, Kumar P et al. (2007) Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 363.
  32. Thomason WE, Raun WR, Johnson GV, Taliaferro CM, Freeman KW, Wynn KJ, Mul- len RW (2004) Switchgrass response to harvest frequency and time and rate of applied nitrogen. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 27, 1199-1226.
  33. Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (2000) Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry -IPCC 2010. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 375 p.
  34. Watson RT, Zinyowera MC, Moss RH (1996) Climate change 1995 -impacts adapta- tion and mitigation of climate change: scientific and technical analysis. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 878 p.
  35. Williams MA, Rice CW, Owensby CE (2004) Carbon andnitrogen pools in a tallgrass prairie soil under elevated carbon dioxide. Soil Science Society American Journal, 68, 148-153.
  36. Wilts AR, Reicosky DC, Allmaras RR, Clapp CE (2004) Long-term corn residue effects: harvest alternatives, soil carbon turnover, and root-derived carbon. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 68, 1342-1351.
  37. Zan C, Fyles J, Girouard P, Samson R, Doan M (1997) Carbon storage in switchgrass and short-rotation willow plantations. In: Making a Business from Biomass in Energy, Environment, Chemicals, Fibers, and Materials, Vol 1 (eds Overend RP, Chor- net E), pp. 355-361. Elsevier Science, Oxford, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monti, A., Barbanti, L., Zatta, A., & Zegada‐Lizarazu, W.
Affiliations
University of Bologna (IT)
Corresponding author
Monti, Andrea
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-12-09
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
420-434
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2044144652
Cited by
119
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 4
FWCI
18.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
switchgrass, greenhouse gas emissions, soil carbon sequestration, nitrous oxide emissions, methane emissions, land conversion, life cycle assessment, belowground biomass, root biomass, C4 grasses, energy crops, arable land conversion, permanent grassland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review