Cited by 18Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringPain Management and TreatmentTactile and Sensory Interactions

Comparison of rectangular and exponential current pulses for evoking sensation

Wessale, Jerry L., Geddes, Leslie A., Ayers, Gregory M., Foster, Kirk S.·1992·Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

There exists a paucity of quantitative information comparing the stimulating currents for different waveforms. Thus, the objectives of this study was to compare the threshold peak current (I) for sensation using rectangular and exponential; that is, capacitor-discharge, cathodal pulses of equivalent pulse duration (d). In 10 human subjects, stimuli were applied to the skin of the forearm, and I was determined alternately for each current waveform at each of several pulse durations (d). Strength-duration curves for sensation were obtained using d of 0.01-50 ms. The threshold peak current (Ir) for a rectangular pulse of duration d was compared to the threshold peak current (Icd) for a capacitor-discharge pulse of duration d, where d was the time constant; that is, the time required for the current to decrease to 1/e, or 37% of its peak value. Chronaxie, the pulse duration at which I is twice the infinite-duration current asymptote (i.e., the rheobase), was calculated for each waveform and subject using the Weiss-Lapicque expression for excitability. Icd was found to be always higher than Ir of equivalent duration. Chronaxie for the capacitor-discharge pulse was, on the average, twice that for the rectangular pulse (p less than 0.01). Moreover, the ratio Icd/Ir increased with decreasing d. These results indicate that these two waveforms are not equivalent on the basis of an equal-charge requirement for excitation, particularly at the short pulse durations. Furthermore, they suggest the need of a better expression to describe the excitability characteristics of tissues.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02368523

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wessale, J. L., Geddes, L. A., Ayers, G. M., & Foster, K. S.
Affiliations
  • Abbott (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
Venue
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Published
1992-03
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
237-244
ISSN
  • 0090-6964 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-9686
OpenAlex
W2029556013
Cited by
18
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
sensory threshold, rectangular pulses, chronaxie, rheobase, strength-duration curve, pulse duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Electric Conductivity, Electric Stimulation, Forearm, Humans, Reference Values, Sensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review