Cited by 157Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

Non-rectangular waveforms for neural stimulation with practical electrodes

Open access
Sahin, Mesut, Tie, Yanmei·2007·Journal of Neural Engineering

Abstract

Historically the rectangular pulse waveform has been the choice for neural stimulation. The strength-duration curve is thus defined for rectangular pulses. Not much attention has been paid to alternative waveforms to determine if the pulse shape has an effect on the strength-duration relation. Similarly the charge injection capacity of neural electrodes has also been measured with rectangular pulses. In this study we questioned if non-rectangular waveforms can generate a stronger stimulation effect, when applied through practical electrodes, by minimizing the neural activation threshold and maximizing the charge injection capacity of the electrode. First, the activation threshold parameters were studied with seven different pulse shapes using computer simulations of a local membrane model. These waveforms were rectangular, linear increase and decrease, exponential increase and decrease, Gaussian, and sinusoidal. The chronaxie time was found to be longer with all the non-rectangular pulses and some provided more energy efficient stimulation than the rectangular waveform. Second, the charge injection capacity of titanium nitride microelectrodes was measured experimentally for the same waveforms. Linearly decreasing ramp provided the best charge injection for all pulse widths tested from 0.02 to 0.5 ms. Finally, the most efficient waveform that maximized the charge injection capacity of the electrode while providing the lowest threshold charge for neural activation was searched. Linear and exponential decrease, and Gaussian waveforms were found to be the most efficient pulse shapes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2560/4/3/008

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Sweeney J D, Mortimer J T and Durand D 1987 Modeling of mammalian myelinated nerve for functional neuromuscular electrostimulation IEEE 9th Ann. Conf. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (Boston, MA) pp 1577-8
  2. Shankar Y R and Sahin M 2005 The effect of stimulus waveform on the strength-duration curve Proc. Annual Meeting of Biomedical Engineering Society (Baltimore, MD)
  3. Horackova M, Nonner W and Stampfli R 1968 Action potentials and voltage clamp currents of single rat Ranvier nodes Proc. Int. Union Physiol. Sci. 7 198

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahin, M., & Tie, Y.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2007-05-02
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
227-233
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2045495785
Cited by
157
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS050757)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
neurostimulation, strength-duration curve, activation threshold, chronaxie, charge injection capacity, pulse shape, exponential pulse, Gaussian pulse, sinusoidal pulses
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Computer Simulation, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Equipment Design, Humans, Membrane Potentials, Models, Neurological, Neurons, Peripheral Nerves, Equipment Failure Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review