CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 60

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recent Directions and Developments in Geographical Information Systems

Kvamme, Kenneth L.·1999·Journal of Archaeological Research
DOI 10.1007/s10814-005-0002-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Verifying this paper

8 of 9 steps done · this page updates itself — you can leave and come back

  1. Registry recordVerified
  2. Full textFetching the open-access text — a few minutes for a paper we haven’t read before
  3. Reference listNot fetched yet
  4. Reference checkNot run yet for this paper
  5. StatisticsNeeds the full text
  6. ClaimsNeeds the full text
  7. Cited sourcesNeeds claims to check
  8. Self-checkNeeds the full text
  9. VerificationFindings verified

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10814-005-0002-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Over the past two decades GIS has proven valuable in a number of archaeological applications.

    “Over the past two decades GIS has proven valuable in a number of archaeological applications (Aldenderfer and Maschner 1996;Allen et al. 1990;Kvamme 1999;Maschner 1996;Wheatley and Gillings 2002).”

    From Flexibility by design: how mobile GIS meets the needs of archaeological survey (2004) · cites this paper as Kvamme 1999

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 199

  1. Aberg, F. A., and Leech, R. H. (1992). The national archaeological record for England: Past, present and future. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 157–170.
  2. Aldenderfer, M. (1992). The state of GIS and anthropological research. Anthropological Newsletter 3: 14.
  3. Aldenderfer, M. (1996). Introduction. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–18. · DOI
  4. Allen, K. M. S. (1996). Iroquoian landscapes: People, environments, and the GIS context. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 198–222.
  5. Altschul, J. H. (1990). Red flag models: The use of modelling in management contexts. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor, and Francis, London, pp. 236–238.
  6. Andresen, J., and Madsen, T. (1992). Data structures for excavation recording. A case of complex information management. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 23–42.
  7. Arnold, J. B., III (1979), Archaeological applications of computer drawn contour and three dimensional perspective plots. In Upham, S. (ed.), Computer Graphics in Archaeology, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 15, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 1–15.
  8. Arroyo-Bishop, D. (1991). The ArchaeoDATA system: Towards a European archaeological document. In Lockyear, K., and Rahtz, S. P. Q. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1990, BAR International Series, No. 565, Oxford, pp. 61–70.
  9. Arroyo-Bishop, D. (1992). Further structuring of the ArcheoDATA system. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 89–94.
  10. Arroyo-Bishop, D., and Zarzosa, L. (1992). The ArchaeoDATA system: A method for structuring a European archaeological information system (AIS). In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 133–156.
  11. Arroyo-Bishop, D., and Zarzosa, L. (1995). To be or not to be: Will an object-space-time GIS/AIS become a reality or end up an archaeological entity? In Lock, G. R., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 43–54.
  12. Baena, J., Blasco, C., and Recuero, V. (1995). The spatial analysis of Bell Beaker sites in the Madrid region. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 101–116.
  13. Bamforth, D. B. (1994). Discussant remarks in the symposium “Albert Spaulding and the continuation of archaeological science,” presented at the annual meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Anaheim, CA.
  14. Bampton, M., and Hamilton, N. (1996). GIS, education and stewardship in Casco Bay Estuary, Maine. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 1–58.
  15. Beex, W. (1995). From excavation drawing to archaeological playground: CAD applications for excavations. In Wilcock, J., and Lockyear, K. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1993, BAR International Series, No. 598, Oxford, pp. 101–108.
  16. Berry, J. K. (1995). Spatial Reasoning for Effective GIS, GIS World, Inc., Fort Collins, Co.
  17. Bfro, K. T., and Fejes, I. Sz. (1995). GIS applications at the Hungarian National Museum, Department of Information. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.). Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 261–268.
  18. Biskowski, M. (1994). GIS and the study of grinding tools in the Teotihuacan Valley, Mexico. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No, 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 115–134.
  19. Biswell, S., Cropper, L., Evans, J., Gaffney, V., and Leach, P. (1995). GIS and excavation: A cautionary tale from Shepton Mallet, Somerset, England. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 269–286.
  20. Boaz, J. S., and Uleberg, E. (1993). Gardermoen Project: Use of a GIS system in antiquities registration and research. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 177–182.
  21. Bosqued, C. B., Preysler, J. B., and Expiago, J. (1996). The role of GIS in the management of archaeological data: An example of application for the Spanish administration. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 190–201.
  22. Brandt, R., Groenewoudt, B. J., and Kvamme, K. L. (1992) An experiment in archaeological site location: Modeling in the Netherlands using GIS techniques. World Archaeology 24: 268–282. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Canouts, V. (1992). Computerized information exchange on the local and natural levels in USA. In Larsen, C. (ed.). Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 231–248.
  24. Carmichael, D. L. (1990). GIS predictive modelling of prehistoric site distributions in central Montana. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 216–225.
  25. Carr, C. (1985). Introductory remarks on regional analysis. In Carr, C. (ed.), For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory, Westport Publishers, Kansas City, MO, pp. 114–127.
  26. Carr, T. L., and Turner, M. D. (1996). Investigating regional lithic procurement using multispectral imagery and geophysical exploration. Archaeological Prospection 3: 109–128. · DOI
  27. Chadwick, A. J. (1978). A computer simulation of Mycenean settlement. In Hodder, I. (ed.). Simulation Studies in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 47–57.
  28. Chadwick, A. J. (1979). Settlement simulation. In Renfrew, C., and Cooke, D. (eds.), Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change, Academic Press, New York, pp. 237–255. · DOI
  29. Chartrand, J. A. (1996). Archaeological resource visibility and GIS: A case study in Yorkshire. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA9S, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 387–398.
  30. Chartrand, J., Richards, J., and Vyner, B. (1993). Bridging the urban-rural gap: GIS and the York Environs Project. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 159–166.
  31. Clark, G. A. (1979). Spatial association at Liencres, an early Holocene open site on the Santander coast, north-central Spain. In Upham, S. (ed.), Computer Graphics in Archaeology, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 15, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 121–43.
  32. Copp, S. A. (1977). A quick plotting program for archaeological data. Newsletter of Computer Archaeology 13: 17–25.
  33. Cowen, D. J. (1988). GIS versus CAD versus DBMS: What are the differences? Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 54: 1551–1555.
  34. Csaki, G., Jerem, E., and Redo, F. (1995). Data recording and GIS applications in landscape and intrasite analysis: Case studies in progress at the Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 85–100.
  35. Dalla Bona, L. (1993). A preliminary predictive model of prehistoric activity location for the western Lake Nipigon watershed. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 37: 11–19.
  36. Dalla Bona, L., and Larcombe, L. (1996). Modeling prehistoric land use in northern Ontario. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 252–274.
  37. David, A. (1995). Geophysical Survey in Archaeological Field Evaluation, Research and Professional Services Guideline, No. 1, English Heritage Society, London.
  38. de Lapparent, V., Geller, M. J., and Huchra, J. P. (1986). A slice of the universe. Astrophysical Journal (Letters) 302: L1–L5. · DOI
  39. Doody, M., Synnott, P., Tobin, R., and Masterson, B. (1995). A topographic survey of the inland promontory fort at Castle Gale, Carrig Henry, County Limerick. In Discovery Programme Reports 2: Project Results 1993, Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, pp. 39–44.
  40. Dunnell, R. C., and Dancey, W. S. (1983). The siteless survey: A regional scale data collection strategy. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 6, Academic Press, New York, pp. 267–287. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Ebert, J. I. (1978). Remote sensing and large-scale cultural resources management. In Lyons, T. R., and Ebert, J. I. (eds.), Remote Sensing and Nondestructive Archaeology, National Park Service, Washington, DC, pp. 21–34.
  42. Ebert, J. I. (1988). Remote sensing in archaeological prospection and prediction. In Judge, W. J., and Sebastian, L. (eds.), Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, pp. 429–492.
  43. Ebert, J. I., Camilli, E. L., and Berman, M. J. (1996). GIS in the analysis of distributional archaeological data. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 25–37.
  44. Effland, R. W. (1979). Statistical distribution cartography and computer graphics. In Upham, S. (ed.) Computer Graphics in Archaeology, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 15, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 17–29.
  45. Estrada Belli, F. (1997). GPS and GIS as aids for mapping archaeological sites. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 47: 5–10.
  46. Farley, J. A., Limp, W. F., and Lockhart, J. (1990). The archaeologist’s workbench: Integrating GIS, remote sensing, EDA and database management. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 141–164.
  47. Farley, J. A., and Gisiger, A. (1996). Managing the infrastructure: The use of a corporate metadata for archaeology. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 275–300.
  48. Feder, K. L. (1979). Geographic patterning of tool types as elicited by trend surface analysis. In Upham, S. (ed.), Computer Graphics in Archaeology, Anthropological Research Papers, No. 15, Arizona State University, Tempe, pp. 95–102.
  49. Fisher, P. (1992). First experiments in viewshed uncertainty: Simulating fuzzy viewsheds. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 58: 345–352.
  50. Fisher, P. F., and Lindenberg, R. E. (1989). On distinctions among cartography, remote sensing, and geographic information systems. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 55: 1431–1434.
  51. Flude, K., George, S., and Roskams, S. (1982). Uses of an archaeological database with particular reference to computer graphics and the writing-up process. In Computer Applications in Archaeology 1981, Institute of Archaeology, University of London, London, pp. 64–75.
  52. Forte, M. (1995). Scientific visualization and archaeological landscape: The case study of a Terramarra, Italy. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 231–238.
  53. Forte, M., and Guidazzoli, A. (1996). Archaeology, GIS and desktop virtual reality: The ARCTOS Project. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 443–456.
  54. Gaffney, V., and Stancic, Z. (1991). GIS Approaches to Regional Analysis: A Case Study of the Island of Hvar, Znanstveni Institut Filozofske Fakultete, Ljubljana.
  55. Gaffney, V., and van Leusen, P. M. (1995). Postscript: GIS, environmental determinism and archaeology. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 367–382.
  56. Gaffney, V., and van Leusen, M. (1996). Extending GIS methods for regional archaeology: The Wroxeter Hinterland Project. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 297–305.
  57. Gaffney, V., Ostir, K., Podobnikar, T., and Stancic, Z. (1996). Satellite imagery and GIS applications in Mediterranean landscapes. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 337–342.
  58. Gaffney, V., Stancic, Z., and Watson, H. (1995). The impact of GIS on archaeology: A personal perspective. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 211–230.
  59. Gaffney, V., Stancic, Z., and Watson, H. (1996). Moving from catchments to cognition: Tentative steps toward a larger archaeological context for GIS. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 132–154.
  60. Geller, M. J. (1988). Mapping the universe: Slices and bubbles. In Cornell, J. (ed.), Bubbles, Voids, and Bumps in Time: The New Cosmology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 50–72.
  61. Gillings, M. (1995). Flood dynamics and settlement in the Tisza Valley of north-east Hungary: GIS and the upper Tisza Project. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 67–84.
  62. Gould, P., and White, R. (1974). Mental Maps, Penguin Books, New York. · DOI
  63. Green, D. F., and Stewart, J. B. (1983), Computer generated research aids using the forest service DTIS II system. Advances in Computer Archaeology 1: 4–25.
  64. Groenewoudt, B. J., and Wiemer, R. (1993). Valkenburg-Marktveld: Analyzing the predictive potential of Roman surface scatters using GIS. In Van Dierendonck, R. M., Hallewas, D. P., and Waugh, K. E. (eds.). The Valkenburg Excavations 1985–1988: Introduction and Detail Studies, Rijksdienst voor bet Oudheidkundig Bodemonderzoek, Amersfoort, Netherlands, pp. 47–81.
  65. Guillot, D. (1992). The national archaeological record of France: Advances in computerization. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 125–132.
  66. Guillot, D., and Leroy, G. (1995). The use of GIS for archaeological resource management in France: The SCALA Project, with a case study in Picardie. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 15–26.
  67. Hall, S. S. (1992). Mapping the Next Millenium: How Computer-Driven Cartography Is Revolutionizing the Face of Science, Random House, New York.
  68. Hansen, H. J. (1993). European archaeological databases: Problems and prospects. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 229–238.
  69. Harris, T. M., and Lock, G. R. (1990). The diffusion of a new technology: A perspective on the adoption of a geographic information system within UK archaeology. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 33–53.
  70. Harris, T. M., and Lock, G. R. (1992). Toward a regional GIS site information retrieval system: The Oxfordshire sites and monuments record (SMR) prototype. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 185–199.
  71. Harris, T., and Lock, G. (1995). Toward an evaluation of GIS in European archaeology: The past, present and future of theory and applications. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 349–366.
  72. Harris, T. M., and Lock, G. R. (1996). Multi-dimensional GIS: Exploratory approaches to spatial and temporal relationships within archaeological stratigraphy. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 307–316.
  73. Hasenstab, R. J. (1996). Settlement as adaptation: Variability in Iroquois village site selection as inferred through GIS. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 223–241.
  74. Hasenstab, R. J., and Resnick, B. (1990). GIS in historical predictive modelling: The Fort Drum project. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 284–306.
  75. Hinshelwood, A., and Dalla Bona, L. (1994). GIS and intrasite analysis: An example from northwestern Ontario. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 40: 12–20.
  76. Hobbs, E. (1996). Preliminary results from Mn/Model. Mn/Model Newsletter 2: 1–3.
  77. Hodder, I., and Orton, C. (1976). Spatial Analysis in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  78. Holdaway, S. (1996). GIS and open site archeology in western New South Wales, Australia. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. I: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, p. 218.
  79. Hunt, E. D. (1992). Upgrading site-catchment analyses with the use of GIS: Investigating the settlement patterns of horticulturists. World Archaeology 24: 283–309. · DOI
  80. Johnson, J. K. (1996). Delta digitizing: GIS and remote sensing in northwest Mississippi. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.). New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modem Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 242–251.
  81. Johnson, J. K., Madry, S. L. H., and Sever, T. (1988). Remote sensing and GIS analysis in large scale survey design in north Mississippi. Southeastern Archaeology 7: 124–131.
  82. Jones, J. (1996). TMAPPER! High quality map production with IDRISI vector data. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 45: 5–11.
  83. Judge, W. J., and Sebastian, L. (eds.) (1988). Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, U. S. Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, Denver.
  84. Kirkinen, T. (1996). Center in the wilderness area using a geographical information system (GIS) in modelling the Late Iron Age settlement in eastern Finland. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 93–100.
  85. Kohler, T. A., and Gumerman, G. J. (1996). Beyond GIS: Populating worlds with agents. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 101–106.
  86. Kohler, T. A., and Parker, S. C. (1986). Predictive models for archaeological resource location. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 9, Academic Press, New York, pp. 397–452. · DOI
  87. Kotsakis, K., Andreau, S., Vargas, A., and Papoudas, D. (1995). Reconstructing a Bronze Age site with CAD. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 181–188.
  88. Kuna, M., and Adelsbergerova, D. (1995). Prehistoric location preferences: An application of GIS to the Vinorsky Potok project, Bohemia, the Czech Republic. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 117–132.
  89. Kvamme, K. L. (1984). Models of prehistoric site location near Pinon Canyon, Colorado. In Condie, C. J. (ed.), The Archaeology of Northeastern New Mexico, New Mexico Archaeological Council, Albuquerque, pp. 347–370.
  90. Kvamme, K. L. (1989). Geographic information systems in regional archaeological research and data management. In Schiffer, M. B. (ed.), Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 1, University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp. 139–202.
  91. Kvamme, K. L. (1990a). One-sample tests in regional archaeological analysis: New possibilities through computer technology. American Antiquity 55: 367–381. · DOI
  92. Kvamme, K. L. (1990b). The fundamental principles and practice of predictive archaeological modeling. In Voorrips, A. (ed.), Mathematics and Information Science in Archaeology: A Flexible Framework, Studies in Modern Archaeology, Vol. 3, Holes-Verlag, Bonn, Germany, pp. 257–295.
  93. Kvamme, K. L. (1992a). Geographic information systems and archaeology. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 77–84.
  94. Kvamme, K. L. (1992b). Terrain form analysis of archaeological location through geographic information systems. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 127–136.
  95. Kvamme, K. L. (1992c). A predictive site location model on the High Plains: An example with an independent test. Plains Anthropologist 37: 19–40. · DOI · Paper page
  96. Kvamme, K. L. (1992). Spatial statistics and GIS: An integrated approach. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 91–103.
  97. Kvamme, K. L. (1994). Ranter’s corner —GIS graphics vs. spatial statistics: How do they fit together? Archaeological Computing Newsletter 38: 1–2.
  98. Kvamme, K. L. (1995). A view from across the water: The North American experience in archaeological GIS. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 1–14.
  99. Kvamme, K. L. (1996a). Investigating chipping debris scatters: GIS as an analytical engine. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modem Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 38–71.
  100. Kvamme, K. L. (1996b). A proton magnetometry survey at Navan Fort. Emania 14: 83–88.
  101. Kvamme, K. L. (1996c). Randomization methods for statistical inference in raster GIS contexts. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Prolohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 107–114.
  102. Kvamme, K. L. (1997). Ranter’s comer—Bringing the camps together: GIS and ED. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 47: 1–5.
  103. Kvamme, K. L, and Jochim, M. A. (1989). The environmental basis of Mesolithic settlement. In Bonsail, C. (ed.), The Mesolithic in Europe: Papers Presented at the Third International Symposium, John Donald Publishers, Edinburgh, pp. 1–12.
  104. Ladefoged, T. N., McLachlan, S. M., Ross, S. C. L., Sheppard, P. J., and Sutton, D. G. (1995). GIS-based image enhancement of conductivity and magnetic susceptibility data from Ureturituri Pa and Fort Resolution, New Zealand. American Antiquity 60: 471–481. · DOI
  105. Lang, L. (1994). GPS on the right trail. Government Technology 7: 28–31.
  106. Lang, N. A. R. (1993). From model to machine procurement and implementation of geographical information systems for county sites and monuments records. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 167–175.
  107. Larsen, C. (ed.) (1992). Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 185–199.
  108. Larson, P. (1975). Trend analysis in archaeology: A preliminary study of intrasite patterning, Norwegian Archaeological Review 8: 75–80. · DOI
  109. Lave, C. A., and March, J. G. (1975). An Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences, Harper and Row, New York.
  110. Limp, W. F. (1989). The Use of Multispectral Digital Imagery in Archeological Investigations, Research Series No. 24, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.
  111. Limp, W. F. (1991). Continuous cost movement models. In Behrens, C. A., and Sever, T. L. (eds.), Applications of Space Age Technology in Anthropology, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Science and Technology Laboratory, John C. Stennis Space Center, MS, pp. 237–250.
  112. Limp, W. F. (1992). The challenge of automated systems in archaeology. Federal Archeology Report 5: 1–2.
  113. Limp, W. F. (1996). Developing methodologies in the analysis of spatially referenced data and their impacts on archaeological method and theory. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.). The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 115–126.
  114. Limp, W. F., and Gisiger, A. (1992). Continental scale archaeology studies using GIS. Federal Archeology Report 5: 3–6.
  115. Lock, G. R. (1993). GIS or CAD: What’s in a name? Archaeological Computing Newsletter 37: 1–2.
  116. Lock, G. (1995). Archaeological computing, archaeological theory and moves toward contextualism. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 13–18.
  117. Lock, G., and Harris, T. (1992). Visualizing spatial data: The importance of geographic information systems. In Reilly, P., and Rahtz, S. (eds.), Archaeology and the Information Age: A Global Perspective, Routledge, London, pp. 81–96.
  118. Lock, G. R., and Harris, T. M. (1996). Danebury revisited: An English Iron Age hillfort in a digital landscape. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 214–240.
  119. Madry, S. L. H. (1990). The realities of hardware. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 173–183.
  120. Madry, S. L. H., and Crumley, C. L. (1990). An application of remote sensing and GIS in a regional archaeological settlement pattern analysis: The Arroux River Valley, Burgundy, France. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.). Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 364–380.
  121. Madry, S. L. H., and Rakos, L. (1996). Line-of-sight and cost-surface techniques for regional research in the Arroux River Valley. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 104–126.
  122. Madsen, T. (1996). GIS and Scandinavian archaeology: A tale from the real world. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 127–136.
  123. Marble, D. F. (1984). Geographic information systems: An overview. In Spatial Information Technologies for Remote Sensing Today and Tomorrow, Proceedings of Pecora 9, IEEE, Silver Springs, MD, pp. 18–24.
  124. Maschner, H. D. G. (1996a). Geographic information systems in archaeology. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 1–24.
  125. Maschner, H. D. G. (1996b). The politics of settlement choice on the Northwest coast: GIS, cognition, and coastal landscapes. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 175–189.
  126. Maschner, H. D. G. (1996c). Review of Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: European Perspective [Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), 1995, Taylor and Francis, London]. Geoarchaeology 11: 505–507.
  127. Maschner, H. D. G., and Stein, J. (1995). Multivariate approaches to site location on the northwest coast of North America. Antiquity 69: 61–73. · DOI
  128. Massagrande, F. A. (1995). Using GIS with non-systematic survey data: The Mediterranean evidence. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 55–66.
  129. McClung de Tapia, E., and Tapia-Recillas, H. (1996). Statistical analysis using G1S in the study of Prehispanic settlement location in the Teotihuacan region, Mexico. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. I: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 137–148.
  130. Meffert, M. (1995). Spatial relations in Roman Iron Age settlements in the Assendelver polders, the Netherlands. In Lock, G., and Staniif, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 287–300.
  131. Middleton, R., and Winstanley, D. (1993). GIS in a landscape archaeology context. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 151–158.
  132. Mikkelson, D. M., and Larsen, J. H. (1992). Recording archaeological sites in Norway. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 71–80.
  133. Miller, P. (1995). How to look good and influence people: Thoughts on the design and interpretation of an archaeological GIS. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 319–334.
  134. Miller, P. A. (1996). Digging deep: GIS in the city. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 369–376.
  135. Murray, D. M. (1995). The management of archaeological information: A strategy. In Wilcock, J., and Lockyear, K. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1993, BAR International Series, No. 598, Oxford, pp. 83–88.
  136. Music, B. (1995). On-site prospection in Slovenia: The case of Rodik. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 43: 6–15.
  137. Newman, C. (1993). The Tara survey: Interim report. In Discovery Programme Reports 1: Project Results 1992, Royal Irish Academy, Dublin, pp. 70–93.
  138. Nunez, M., Vikkula, A., and Kirkinen, T. (1995). Perceiving time and space in an isostatically rising region. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 141–152.
  139. Oppenshaw, S. (1991). A view on the GIS crisis in geography, or, using GIS to put Humty-Dumpty back together again. Environment and Planning A 23: 621–628. · DOI · Paper page
  140. Oswald, A. (1996). Restoring a thirteenth century castle wall using GIS. ARCNews 18: 26.
  141. Ozawa, K., Kato, T., and Tsude, H. (1995). Detection of beacon networks between ancient hill-forts using a digital terrain model based GIS. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.). Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 157–162.
  142. Palumbo, G. (1993). JADIS (Jordan Antiquities Database and Information System): An example of national archaeological inventory and GIS applications. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 183–188.
  143. Parker, S. (1985). Predictive modeling of site settlement systems using multivariate logistics. In Carr, C. (ed.), For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis: Bridging Data Structure, Quantitative Technique, and Theory, Westport Publishers, Kansas City, MO, pp. 173–207.
  144. Parker, S. (1986). The role of geographic information systems in cultural resource management. In Opitz, B. K. (ed.). Geographic Information Systems in Government, Vol. 1, A. Deepak Publishing, Hampton, VA, pp. 133–140.
  145. Peterman, O. L. (1992). Geographic information systems: Archaeology’s latest tool. Biblical Archaeologist 55: 162–167. · DOI
  146. Petrie, L., Johnson, I., Cullen, B., and Kvamme, K. L. (1995). GIS in Archaeology: An Annotated Bibliography, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 1, Sydney University, Sydney.
  147. Plog, F. T, and Hill, J. N. (1971). Explaining variability in the distribution of sites. In Gumerman, G. J. (ed.), The Distribution of Prehistoric Population Aggregates, Anthropological Reports, No. 1, Prescott College Press, Prescott, AZ, pp. 7–36.
  148. Potts, R., Jorstad, T., and Cole, D. (1996). The role of GIS in the interdisciplinary investigations at Olorgesailie, Kenya, a Pleistocene archaeological locality. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 202–213.
  149. Preysler, J. B., and Blasco, C. (1996). Application of GIS to images and their processing: The Chiribiquete Mountains Project. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 353–358.
  150. Raper, J., (1989). Three Dimensional Applications in Geographic Information Systems, Taylor and Francis, London.
  151. Renfrew, C., and Level, E. V. (1979). Exploring dominance: Predicting polities from centers. In Renfrew, C., and Cooke, K. L. (eds.), Transformations: Mathematical Approaches to Culture Change, Academic Press, New York, pp. 145–167. · DOI · Paper page
  152. Reynoso, C., and Castro, D. (1994). VB-GIS 3D: A GIS specifically designed for archaeology. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 135–142.
  153. Richards, J. D. (1996). Putting the site in its setting: GIS and the search for Anglo-Saxon settlement in Noithumbria. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.), Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 377–386.
  154. Robinson, H. (1993). The archaeological implications of a computerized integrated national heritage information system. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 139–150.
  155. Romano, D. G., and Tolba, O. (1995). Remote sensing, GIS and electronic surveying: Reconstructing the city plan and landscape of Roman Corinth. In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 163–174.
  156. Roorda, I. M., and Wiemer, R., (1992a). Towards a new archaeological information system in the Netherlands. In Lock, G., and Moffett, J. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1991, BAR International Series, No. S577, Oxford, pp. 85–88.
  157. Roorda, I., and Wiemer, R. (1992b). The ARCHIS Project: Towards a new national archaeological record in the Netherlands. In Larsen, C. (ed.), Sites and Monuments: National Archaeological Records, The National Museum of Denmark, Copenhagen, pp. 117–124.
  158. Ruggles, A. J., and Church, R. L. (1996). Spatial allocation in archaeology: An opportunity for reevaluation. In Maschner H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 147–176.
  159. Ruggles, C. L. N., Medyckyj-Scott, D. J., and Gruffydd, A. (1993). Multiple viewshed analysis using GIS and its archaeological application: A case study in northern Mull. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 125–131.
  160. Ruggles, C. L. N., and Medyckyj-Scott, D. J. (1996). Site location, landscape visibility, and symbolic astronomy: A Scottish case study. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 127–146.
  161. Sanz, F. Q., Preysler, J. B., and Bosqued, C. B. (1995). An application of GIS to intra-site spatial analysis: The Iberian Iron Age cemetery of El Cigarralejo (Murcia, Spain). In Huggett, J., and Ryan, N. (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1994, BAR International Series, No. 600, Oxford, pp. 137–146.
  162. Savage, S. H. (1990a). GIS in archaeological research. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 22–32.
  163. Savage, S. H. (1990b). Modelling the Late Archaic social landscape. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 330–355.
  164. Scollar, I. (1966). Computer treatment of magnetic measurements from archaeological sites. Archaeometry 9: 61–11. · DOI
  165. Scollar, I., Tabbagh, A., Hesse, A., and Herzog, I. (1990). Archaeological Prospecting and Remote Sensing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  166. Sebastian, L., and Judge, J. W. (1988). Predicting the past: Correlation, explanation, and the use of archaeological models. In Judge, W. J., and Sebastian, L. (eds.), Quantifying the Present and Predicting the Past: Theory, Method, and Application of Archaeological Predictive Modeling, U. S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Denver, pp. 1–18.
  167. Shennan, S. (1988). Quantifying Archaeology, Academic Press, San Diego.
  168. Shermer, S. J., and Tiffany, J. A. (1985). Environmental variables as factors in site location: An example from the upper Midwest. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 10: 215–240.
  169. Snow, D. R. (1994). Using MapInfo to map archaeological data. In Johnson, I. (ed.). Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 143–148.
  170. Snow, D. R. (1996). GIS applications in North America. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 159–168.
  171. Stancic, Z. (1994). Locational analysis and settlement studies with GIS. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 73–80.
  172. Stancic, Z., and Gaffney, V. (1996). GIS based analysis of the population trends on the island of Brac in Central Dalmatia. In Bietti, A., Cazzella, A., Johnson, I., and Voorrips, A. (eds.), The Colloquia of the XIII International Congress of Prehistoric and Protohistoric Sciences, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Problems, ABACO, Forli, Italy, pp. 169–184.
  173. Stancic, Z., Dular, J., Gaffney, V., and Tecco-Hvala, S. (1995). A GIS-based analysis of later prehistoric settlement patterns in Dolenjska, Slovenia. In Wilcock, J., and Lockyear, K. (ed.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1993, BAR International Series, No. 598, Oxford, pp. 161–164.
  174. Star, J., and Estes, J. E. (1990). Geographic Information Systems: An Introduction, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  175. Stead, S. (1995). Humans and PETS in space. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 313–318.
  176. Steele, J., Sluckin, T. J., Denholm, D. R., and Gamble, C. S. (1996). Simulating hunter-gatherer colonization of the Americas. In Kamermans, H., and Fennema, K. (eds.). Interfacing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA95, Vol. 2, Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia, No. 28, University of Leiden, Leiden, pp. 223–227.
  177. Thomas, D. H., and Bellinger, R. L. (1976). Prehistoric Pinon Ecotone Settlements of the Upper Reese River Valley, Central Nevada, Anthropological Papers, Vol. 53, No.3, American Museum of Natural History, New York.
  178. Unwin, D. (1981) Introductory Spatial Analysis, Methuen, London.
  179. van Leusen, P. M. (1993). Cartographic modelling in a cell-based GIS. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 105–122.
  180. van Leusen, P. M. (1996). GIS and location modeling in Dutch archaeology: A review of current approaches. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.). New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 177–197.
  181. Van West, C. (1994). Modeling Prehistoric Agricultural Productivity in Southwestern Colorado: A GIS Approach, Department of Anthropology Reports of Investigations, No. 67, Washington State University, Pullman.
  182. Van West, C., and Kohler, T. A. (1996). A time to rend, a time to sew: New perspectives on Northern Anasazi sociopolitical development in late prehistory. In Aldenderfer, M., and Maschner, H. D. G. (eds.), Anthropology, Space and Geographic Information Systems, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 107–131.
  183. Vikkula, A. (1994). Stone Age environment and landscape changes on the eastern Finnish Lake District. In Johnson, I. (ed.), Methods in the Mountains: Proceedings of UISPP Commission IV Meeting, Mount Victoria, Australia, Archaeological Methods Series, No. 2, Sydney University, Sydney, pp. 91–98.
  184. Vita-Finzi, C., and Higgs, E. S. (1970). Prehistoric economy in the Mount Carmel area of Palestine: Site catchment analysis. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 36: 1–37. · DOI · Paper page
  185. Wansleeben, M. (1988). Applications of geographical information systems in archaeological research. In Rahtz, S. P. Q. (ed.), Computer and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 1988, Vol. 2, BAR International Series, No. 446 (ii), Oxford, pp. 435–451.
  186. Wansleeben, M., and Verhart, L. B. M. (1995). GIS on different spatial levels and the Neolithization process in the south-eastern Netherlands. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 153–170.
  187. Warren, R. E. (1990a). Predictive modelling in archaeology: A primer. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 90–111.
  188. Warren, R. E. (1990b). Predictive modeling of archaeological site location: A case study in the Midwest. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 201–215.
  189. Wheatley, D. (1993). Going over old ground: GIS, archaeological theory and the act of perception. In Andresen, J., Madsen, T., and Scollar, I. (eds.), Computing the Past: Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, CAA92, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, pp. 133–137.
  190. Wheatley, D. (1995a). The impact of information technology on the practice of archaeological management. In Cooper, M. A., Firth, A., Carman, J., and Wheatley, D. (eds.), Managing Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 163–174.
  191. Wheatley, D. (1995b). Cumulative viewshed analysis: A GIS-based method for investigating intervisibility, and its archaeological application. In Lock, G., and Stands, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 171–186.
  192. Wheatley, D. (1996). The use of GIS to understand regional variation in Earlier Neolithic Wessex. In Maschner, H. D. G. (ed.), New Methods, Old Problems: Geographic Information Systems in Modern Archaeological Research, Occasional Paper, No. 23, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, pp. 75–103.
  193. Wiemer, R. (1995). Another way to deal with maps in archaeological GIS. In Lock, G., and Stancic, Z. (eds.), Archaeology and Geographical Information Systems: A European Perspective, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 301–312.
  194. Williams, I., Limp, W. F., and Briuer, F. L. (1990). Using geographic information systems and exploratory data analysis for archaeological site classification and analysis. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 239–273.
  195. Zubrow, E. B. W. (1990a). The fantasies of GIS software. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 184–194.
  196. Zubrow, E. B. W. (1990b). Modelling and prediction with geographic information systems: A demographic example from prehistoric and historic New York. In Allen, K. M. S., Green, S. W., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), Interpreting Space: GIS and Archaeology, Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 307–318.
  197. Zubrow, E. B. W. (1994). Knowledge representation and archaeology: A cognitive example using GIS. In Renfrew, C., and Zubrow, E. B. W. (eds.), The Ancient Mind: Elements of Cognitive Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 107–118. · DOI
  198. Zubrow, E. (1997). Clusters of death, pockets of survival: Dynamic modelling and GIS. In van der Leeuw, S., and McGlade, J. (eds.), Time, Process and Structured Transformation in Archaeology, Routledge, London, pp. 216–253.
  199. Zubrow, E. B. W., and Harbaugh, J. W. (1978). Archaeological prospecting: Kriging and simulation. In Hodder, I. (ed.), Simulation Studies in Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 109–122.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kvamme, K. L.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Research
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1999-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
153-201
ISSN
  • 1059-0161
  • 1573-7756
DOI
10.1007/s10814-005-0002-9
Cited by
60
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review