Cited by 397Pharmaceutical industry and healthcarePharmaceutical Economics and PolicyPolitical Influence and Corporate Strategies

Source of funding and outcome of clinical trials

Davidson, Richard A.·1986·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Because of recent concerns about conflicts of interest and published research, the author analyzed 107 controlled clinical trials. Studies were classified as favoring either a new therapy or a traditional therapy, and as being supported by a pharmaceutical manufacturer or as being generally supported. Seventy-one per cent of the trials favored new therapies; 43% of these were funded by pharmaceutical firms. Of the 31 trials favoring traditional therapy, only four (13%) were supported by a pharmaceutical firm. There was a statistically significant association between the source of funding and the outcome of the study (p = 0.002). Few trials supported by pharmaceutical manufacturers favored traditional therapy; some reasons for this finding may include selection of drugs likely to be proven efficacious, Type II errors (false-negative studies), and fear of discontinuation of funding should such studies be submitted. Important clinical information may be lost if negative studies are not published.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02602327

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, R. A.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
Davidson, Richard A.
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
1986-05
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
155-158
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W2053664176
Cited by
397
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Keywords
conflicts of interest, pharmaceutical industry funding, publication bias, type II error
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Industry, Research Support as Topic, Editorial Policies, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review