Cited by 24Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

Comparison of effectiveness of thyrotropin-suppressive doses of d- and l-thyroxine in treatment of hypercholesterolemia

Bantle, John P., Hunninghake, Donald B., Frantz, Ivan D., Kuba, Kanta, Mariash, Cary N., Oppenheimer, Jack H.·1984·The American Journal of Medicine

Abstract

In an attempt to compare the cholesterol-lowering effects of equivalent doses of D- and L-thyroxine, 10 euthyroid, hypercholesterolemic subjects were treated with graded doses of each medication in a cross-over design using thyrotropin suppression following thyrotropin-releasing hormone administration as the end-point. The mean thyrotropin-suppressive dose of D-thyroxine was 2.4 +/- 0.66 mg per day, which resulted in mean reductions of 10 percent in total plasma cholesterol, 10 percent in plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 11 percent in plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The mean thyrotropin-suppressive dose of L-thyroxine was 135 +/- 46 micrograms per day, which resulted in mean reductions of 7 percent in total plasma cholesterol, 6 percent in plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and 14 percent in plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. The reductions in total, low-density, and high-density cholesterol achieved with D-thyroxine were not significantly different from those achieved with L-thyroxine. Neither medication produced a significant increase in heart rate or ventricular ectopy as determined by Holter monitoring. These data do not support the belief that D-thyroxine has a preferential cholesterol-lowering effect in humans when compared with equivalent doses of L-thyroxine. In addition, both D- and L-thyroxine reduced plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0002-9343(84)90107-4

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At present, LT4 does not have a recognised role in dyslipidaemia management of euthyroid individuals.

    “At present, LT4 does not have a recognised role in dyslipidaemia management of euthyroid individuals, however”

    From Pharmacodynamic and Therapeutic Actions of Levothyroxine (2021) · cites this paper as [46]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bantle, J. P., Hunninghake, D. B., Frantz, I. D., Kuba, K., Mariash, C. N., & Oppenheimer, J. H.
Corresponding author
Bantle, John P.
Venue
The American Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-09
Volume
77
Issue
3
Pages
475-481
ISSN
0002-9343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086411615
Cited by
24
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
D-thyroxine, levothyroxine, hypercholesterolemia, cholesterol-lowering effect, TSH suppression, thyrotropin-releasing hormone stimulation, serum cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, heart rate, ventricular ectopy
MeSH terms
Adult, Cholesterol, Dextrothyroxine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Lipoproteins, HDL, Cholesterol, HDL, Lipoproteins, LDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Thyrotropin, Thyroxine, Triglycerides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review