Cited by 941Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyCustomer churn and segmentationService and Product Innovation

Reflections on gaining competitive advantage through customer value

Parasuraman, A.·1997·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02894351

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parasuraman, A.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Parasuraman, A.
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
1997-03
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
154-161
ISSN
  • 0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7824
OpenAlex
W2088998721
Cited by
941
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 60 · 2012: 57
FWCI
14.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
customer value, competitive advantage, customer value measurement, competitive strategy, marketing strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review