The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a study by Hembrooke and Gay (2003), laptop use during lecture resulted in significantly lower recall and recognition test scores.”
From Efficient, helpful, or distracting? A literature review of media multitasking in relation to academic performance (2018) · cites this paper as Hembrooke and Gay (2003)
Citations
Cites
James, W. (1891) · Personality Culture Society · doi:10.1037/11059-000 · Cited by 25,876
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Lane, S. D. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315506173-8 · Cited by 4,707
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540
The principles of psychology, Vol I.
James, W. (1890) · doi:10.1037/10538-000 · Cited by 4,514
Broadbent, D. E. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10037-000 · Cited by 4,337
The limited capacity model of mediated message processing
Lang, A. (2000) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x · Cited by 2,153
(1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,687
Melton, A. W. (1964) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-12392-6 · Cited by 985
Mandler, G. (1967) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60516-2 · Cited by 912
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital natives: Where is the evidence?
Helsper, E. J., & Eynon, R. (2010) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920902989227 · Cited by 1,262
The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking
Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797614524581 · Cited by 1,051
Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers
Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003 · Cited by 707
Examining the impact of off-task multi-tasking with technology on real-time classroom learning
Wood, E., Zivcakova, L., Gentile, P., Archer, K., De Pasquale, D., & Nosko, A. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.029 · Cited by 565
The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning
Thompson, P. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.022 · Cited by 557
Metadata
- Authors
- Hembrooke, H., & Gay, G.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hembrooke, Helene
- ORCID
- Gay, Geri
- Venue
- Journal of Computing in Higher Education
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-64
- ISSN
- 1042-1726 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2156724938
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 74 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 34
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Computing in Higher Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Keywords
- multitasking, social computing, cognitive load, student learning, communication courses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
