Cited by 707Personal Information Management and User BehaviorVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovations in Educational Methods

Laptop multitasking hinders classroom learning for both users and nearby peers

Open access
Sana, Faria, Weston, Tina, Cepeda, Nicholas J.·2013·Computers & Education

Abstract

Laptops are commonplace in university classrooms. In light of cognitive psychology theory on costs associated with multitasking, we examined the effects of in-class laptop use on student learning in a simulated classroom. We found that participants who multitasked on a laptop during a lecture scored lower on a test compared to those who did not multitask, and participants who were in direct view of a multitasking peer scored lower on a test compared to those who were not. The results demonstrate that multitasking on a laptop poses a significant distraction to both users and fellow students and can be detrimental to comprehension of lecture content.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.003

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kahneman, D., & Treisman, A. (1984). Changing views of attention and automaticity. In R. Parasuraman, D. R. Davies, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Variants of attention (pp. 29-61). New York: Academic Press.
  2. McCreary, J. R. (2009). The laptop-free zone. Valparaiso University Law Review, 43, 1-87, Retrieved from. http://ssrn.com/abstract¼1280929.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sana, F., Weston, T., & Cepeda, N. J.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Cepeda, Nicholas J.
Venue
Computers & Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
62
Pages
24-31
ISSN
0360-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123222302
Cited by
707
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 8
FWCI
63.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Computers & Education (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
York University Faculty of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Educational Methods
Keywords
student learning, lecture comprehension, distraction, university classrooms, simulated classroom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review