CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Weak cosmic censorship and the rotating quantum BTZ black hole

Frassino, Antonia M., Rocha, Jorge V., Sanna, Andrea P.·2024·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep07(2024)226
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A bstract: Tests of the weak cosmic censorship conjecture examine the possibility of the breakdown of predictivity of the gravitational theory considered, by checking if curvature singularities typically present in black hole spacetimes are concealed within an event horizon at all times. A possible method to perform such tests was proposed by Wald and consists in trying to overspin an extremal rotating black hole by throwing at it a test particle with large angular momentum. In this paper, we analyze the effects of dropping a test particle into an extremal quantum rotating BTZ black hole, whose three-dimensional metric captures the exact backreaction from strongly coupled quantum conformal fields. Our analysis reveals that, despite the inclusion of quantum effects, and akin to the classical scenario, these attempts to destroy the black hole are doomed to be unsuccessful. Particles carrying the maximum angular momentum and still falling into an extremal quantum BTZ black hole can, at most, leave it extremal. Nevertheless, we found numerical evidence that large backreaction of the quantum fields tends to disfavor violations of cosmic censorship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep07(2024)226

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 79

  1. R. Penrose, Gravitational collapse: the role of general relativity, Riv. Nuovo Cim. 1 (1969) 252 [INSPIRE].
  2. R. Penrose, Naked singularities, Annals N. Y. Acad. Sci. 224 (1973) 125 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. A.M. Frassino, R.A. Hennigar, J.F. Pedraza and A. Svesko, Quantum inequalities for quantum black holes, arXiv:2406.17860 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  4. S.W. Hawking, Gravitational radiation from colliding black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26 (1971) 1344 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  5. R.M. Wald, Gravitational collapse and cosmic censorship, gr-qc/9710068 [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0934-7_5] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  6. T. Harada, H. Iguchi and K.-I. Nakao, Physical processes in naked singularity formation, Prog. Theor. Phys. 107 (2002) 449 [gr-qc/0204008] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  7. P.S. Joshi and D. Malafarina, Recent developments in gravitational collapse and spacetime singularities, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 20 (2011) 2641 [arXiv:1201.3660] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  8. R. Emparan, Predictivity lost, predictivity regained: a Miltonian cosmic censorship conjecture, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 29 (2020) 2043021 [arXiv:2005.07389] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  9. R. Emparan, A.M. Frassino and B. Way, Quantum BTZ black hole, JHEP 11 (2020) 137 [arXiv:2007.15999] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. R. Wald, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole, Annals Phys. 82 (1974) 548 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. E.T. Newman et al., Metric of a Rotating, Charged Mass, J. Math. Phys. 6 (1965) 918 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  12. P.O. Mazur, Proof of uniqueness of the Kerr-Newman black hole solution, J. Phys. A 15 (1982) 3173 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. M. Bouhmadi-López, V. Cardoso, A. Nerozzi and J.V. Rocha, Black holes die hard: can one spin-up a black hole past extremality?, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 084051 [arXiv:1003.4295] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  14. J.V. Rocha and V. Cardoso, Gravitational perturbation of the BTZ black hole induced by test particles and weak cosmic censorship in AdS spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 104037 [arXiv:1102.4352] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  15. J.V. Rocha and R. Santarelli, Flowing along the edge: spinning up black holes in AdS spacetimes with test particles, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 064065 [arXiv:1402.4840] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. K.S. Revelar and I. Vega, Overcharging higher-dimensional black holes with point particles, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 064010 [arXiv:1706.07190] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. Y. Zhang and S. Gao, Testing cosmic censorship conjecture near extremal black holes with cosmological constants, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 23 (2014) 1450044 [arXiv:1309.2027] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. J. Jiang and M. Zhang, Overcharging an accelerating Reissner-Nordström-anti-de Sitter black hole with test field and particle, Phys. Lett. B 849 (2024) 138433 [arXiv:2312.16417] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. V.E. Hubeny, Overcharging a black hole and cosmic censorship, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 064013 [gr-qc/9808043] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. F. de Felice and Y.-Q. Yu, Turning a black hole into a naked singularity, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) 1235 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. T. Jacobson and T.P. Sotiriou, Over-spinning a black hole with a test body, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 141101 [Erratum ibid. 103 (2009) 209903] [arXiv:0907.4146] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. A. Saa and R. Santarelli, Destroying a near-extremal Kerr-Newman black hole, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 027501 [arXiv:1105.3950] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. S. Gao and Y. Zhang, Destroying extremal Kerr-Newman black holes with test particles, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 044028 [arXiv:1211.2631] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. K. Düztaş, Overspinning BTZ black holes with test particles and fields, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 124031 [arXiv:1701.07241] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. G.E.A. Matsas and A.R.R. da Silva, Overspinning a nearly extreme charged black hole via a quantum tunneling process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 181301 [arXiv:0706.3198] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. M. Richartz and A. Saa, Challenging the weak cosmic censorship conjecture with charged quantum particles, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 104021 [arXiv:1109.3364] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. S. Hod, Cosmic censorship, area theorem, and selfenergy of particles, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 024016 [gr-qc/0205005] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. S. Hod, Weak Cosmic Censorship: as Strong as Ever, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 121101 [arXiv:0805.3873] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. E. Barausse, V. Cardoso and G. Khanna, Test bodies and naked singularities: is the self-force the cosmic censor?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 261102 [arXiv:1008.5159] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. E. Barausse, V. Cardoso and G. Khanna, Testing the Cosmic Censorship Conjecture with point particles: the effect of radiation reaction and the self-force, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 104006 [arXiv:1106.1692] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. S. Isoyama, N. Sago and T. Tanaka, Cosmic censorship in overcharging a Reissner-Nordström black hole via charged particle absorption, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 124024 [arXiv:1108.6207] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. P. Zimmerman, I. Vega, E. Poisson and R. Haas, Self-force as a cosmic censor, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 041501 [arXiv:1211.3889] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. M. Colleoni and L. Barack, Overspinning a Kerr black hole: the effect of self-force, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 104024 [arXiv:1501.07330] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. M. Colleoni, L. Barack, A.G. Shah and M. van de Meent, Self-force as a cosmic censor in the Kerr overspinning problem, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 084044 [arXiv:1508.04031] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. J. Sorce and R.M. Wald, Gedanken experiments to destroy a black hole. II. Kerr-Newman black holes cannot be overcharged or overspun, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 104014 [arXiv:1707.05862] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  36. K. Düztaş and İ. Semiz, Cosmic Censorship, Black Holes and Integer-spin Test Fields, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064043 [arXiv:1307.1481] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  37. B. Gwak, Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Kerr-(Anti-)de Sitter Black Hole with Scalar Field, JHEP 09 (2018) 081 [arXiv:1807.10630] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  38. D. Chen, Weak cosmic censorship conjecture in BTZ black holes with scalar fields, Chin. Phys. C 44 (2020) 015101 [arXiv:1812.03459] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  39. K. Düztaş, Kerr-Newman black holes can be generically overspun, Eur. Phys. J. C 79 (2019) 316 [arXiv:1904.05185] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  40. J. Natário, L. Queimada and R. Vicente, Test fields cannot destroy extremal black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 175002 [arXiv:1601.06809] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. J. Natário and R. Vicente, Test fields cannot destroy extremal de Sitter black holes, Gen. Rel. Grav. 52 (2020) 5 [arXiv:1908.09854] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. J. Gonçalves and J. Natário, Proof of the weak cosmic censorship conjecture for several extremal black holes, Gen. Rel. Grav. 52 (2020) 94 [arXiv:2004.02902] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  43. R.B. Mann, J.J. Oh and M.-I. Park, The Role of Angular Momentum and Cosmic Censorship in the (2+1)-Dimensional Rotating Shell Collapse, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 064005 [arXiv:0812.2297] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  44. T. Delsate, J.V. Rocha and R. Santarelli, Collapsing thin shells with rotation, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 121501 [arXiv:1405.1433] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  45. J.V. Rocha and R. Santarelli, Scanning the parameter space of collapsing rotating thin shells, Class. Quant. Grav. 35 (2018) 125009 [arXiv:1711.07572] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  46. D.M. Eardley and L. Smarr, Time function in numerical relativity. Marginally bound dust collapse, Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 2239 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. D. Christodoulou, Violation of cosmic censorship in the gravitational collapse of a dust cloud, Commun. Math. Phys. 93 (1984) 171 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  48. A. Ori and T. Piran, Naked Singularities in Selfsimilar Spherical Gravitational Collapse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987) 2137 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  49. S.L. Shapiro and S.A. Teukolsky, Formation of naked singularities: the violation of cosmic censorship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66 (1991) 994 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  50. J.P.S. Lemos, Naked singularities: gravitationally collapsing configurations of dust or radiation in spherical symmetry. A Unified treatment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 1447 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  51. P.S. Joshi and I.H. Dwivedi, Naked singularities in spherically symmetric inhomogeneous Tolman-Bondi dust cloud collapse, Phys. Rev. D 47 (1993) 5357 [gr-qc/9303037] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. T. Harada, Final fate of the spherically symmetric collapse of a perfect fluid, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 104015 [gr-qc/9807038] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. M.W. Choptuik, Universality and scaling in gravitational collapse of a massless scalar field, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 9 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  54. L. Lehner and F. Pretorius, Black Strings, Low Viscosity Fluids, and Violation of Cosmic Censorship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 101102 [arXiv:1006.5960] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  55. P. Figueras, M. Kunesch and S. Tunyasuvunakool, End Point of Black Ring Instabilities and the Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 071102 [arXiv:1512.04532] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  56. P. Figueras, M. Kunesch, L. Lehner and S. Tunyasuvunakool, End Point of the Ultraspinning Instability and Violation of Cosmic Censorship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 151103 [arXiv:1702.01755] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. T. Andrade, R. Emparan, D. Licht and R. Luna, Cosmic censorship violation in black hole collisions in higher dimensions, JHEP 04 (2019) 121 [arXiv:1812.05017] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. T. Andrade, R. Emparan, D. Licht and R. Luna, Black hole collisions, instabilities, and cosmic censorship violation at large D, JHEP 09 (2019) 099 [arXiv:1908.03424] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  59. T. Andrade, P. Figueras and U. Sperhake, Evidence for violations of Weak Cosmic Censorship in black hole collisions in higher dimensions, JHEP 03 (2022) 111 [arXiv:2011.03049] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  60. R. Gregory and R. Laflamme, Black strings and p-branes are unstable, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2837 [hep-th/9301052] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  61. F.C. Eperon, B. Ganchev and J.E. Santos, Plausible scenario for a generic violation of the weak cosmic censorship conjecture in asymptotically flat four dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 041502 [arXiv:1906.11257] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  62. F. Corelli, M. De Amicis, T. Ikeda and P. Pani, Nonperturbative gedanken experiments in Einstein-dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet gravity: nonlinear transitions and tests of the cosmic censorship beyond general relativity, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 044061 [arXiv:2205.13007] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  63. W.E. East and N. Siemonsen, Instability and backreaction of massive spin-2 fields around black holes, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) 124048 [arXiv:2309.05096] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  64. G.T. Horowitz, J.E. Santos and B. Way, Evidence for an Electrifying Violation of Cosmic Censorship, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 195007 [arXiv:1604.06465] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  65. T. Crisford and J.E. Santos, Violating the Weak Cosmic Censorship Conjecture in Four-Dimensional Anti-de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 181101 [arXiv:1702.05490] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  66. N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06 (2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  67. S.-J. Yang, Y.-P. Zhang, S.-W. Wei and Y.-X. Liu, Destroying the event horizon of a nonsingular rotating quantum-corrected black hole, JHEP 04 (2022) 066 [arXiv:2201.03381] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  68. M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, The black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  69. M. Bañados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Geometry of the (2+1) black hole, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 1506 [Erratum ibid. 88 (2013) 069902] [gr-qc/9302012] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  70. R. Emparan, G.T. Horowitz and R.C. Myers, Exact description of black holes on branes. 2. Comparison with BTZ black holes and black strings, JHEP 01 (2000) 021 [hep-th/9912135] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  71. R. Emparan, A. Fabbri and N. Kaloper, Quantum black holes as holograms in AdS brane worlds, JHEP 08 (2002) 043 [hep-th/0206155] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  72. R. Emparan et al., Black holes in dS3, JHEP 11 (2022) 073 [arXiv:2207.03302] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  73. E. Panella and A. Svesko, Quantum Kerr-de Sitter black holes in three dimensions, JHEP 06 (2023) 127 [arXiv:2303.08845] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  74. A.M. Frassino, J.F. Pedraza, A. Svesko and M.R. Visser, Higher-Dimensional Origin of Extended Black Hole Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023) 161501 [arXiv:2212.14055] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  75. P. Bueno, R. Emparan and Q. Llorens, Higher-curvature gravities from braneworlds and the holographic c-theorem, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 044012 [arXiv:2204.13421] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  76. J.F. Plebański and M. Demiański, Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity, Annals Phys. 98 (1976) 98 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  77. J. Podolský, Accelerating black holes in anti-de Sitter universe, Czech. J. Phys. 52 (2002) 1 [gr-qc/0202033] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  78. Y. Feng et al., Quantum Charged Black Holes, arXiv:2404.07192 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  79. A. Climent, R. Emparan and R.A. Hennigar, Chemical Potential and Charge in Quantum Black Holes, arXiv:2404.15148 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Frassino, A. M., Rocha, J. V., & Sanna, A. P.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Alcalá
  • Departamento de Matemática, ISCTE–Instituto Universitário de Lisboa
  • Universitat de Barcelona
ORCID
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-07-24
Volume
2024
Issue
7
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep07(2024)226
Cited by
12
References
1
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review