CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bounds on gravitational brane couplings and tomography in AdS3 black hole microstates

Lee, Ji Hoon, Neuenfeld, Dominik, Shukla, Ashish·2022·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep10(2022)139
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We study information theoretic properties of planar black hole microstates in 2 + 1 dimensional asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetime, modeled by black holes with an end-of-the-world brane behind the horizon. The von Neumann entropy of sufficiently large subregions in the dual CFT exhibits a time-dependent phase, which from a doubly-holographic perspective corresponds to the appearance of quantum extremal islands in the brane description. Considering the case where dilaton gravity is added to the brane, we show that tuning the associated couplings affects the propagation of information in the dual CFT state. By requiring that information theoretic bounds on the growth of entanglement entropy are satisfied in the dual CFT, we can place bounds on the allowed values of the couplings on the brane. Furthermore, we initiate the study of brane tomography, by showing how subleading corrections to the entanglement velocity can be used to learn about the properties of the brane as well as any gravitational dynamics localized on it.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep10(2022)139

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 86

  1. G. ‘t Hooft, Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity, Conf. Proc. C 930308 (1993) 284 [gr-qc/9310026] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  2. L. Susskind, The World as a hologram, J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995) 6377 [hep-th/9409089] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  4. S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. T. Takayanagi, Holographic Dual of BCFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 101602 [arXiv:1105.5165] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni, Aspects of AdS/BCFT, JHEP 11 (2011) 043 [arXiv:1108.5152] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. I. Kourkoulou and J. Maldacena, Pure states in the SYK model and nearly-AdS2 gravity, arXiv:1707.02325 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  10. A. Almheiri, A. Mousatov and M. Shyani, Escaping the Interiors of Pure Boundary-State Black Holes, arXiv:1803.04434 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  11. S. Cooper, M. Rozali, B. Swingle, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell and D. Wakeham, Black hole microstate cosmology, JHEP 07 (2019) 065 [arXiv:1810.10601] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  12. M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, Spectrum of End of the World Branes in Holographic BCFTs, JHEP 06 (2021) 023 [arXiv:2103.06893] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. J. Chandra and T. Hartman, Coarse graining pure states in AdS/CFT, arXiv:2206.03414 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  14. S. Antonini and B. Swingle, Cosmology at the end of the world, Nature Phys. 16 (2020) 881 [arXiv:1907.06667] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  15. Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko and J. Maldacena, Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states, JHEP 02 (2021) 009 [arXiv:2007.16091] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. M. Van Raamsdonk, Comments on wormholes, ensembles, and cosmology, JHEP 12 (2021) 156 [arXiv:2008.02259] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. Z. Wang, Z. Xu, S. Zhou and Y. Zhou, Partial reduction and cosmology at defect brane, JHEP 05 (2022) 049 [arXiv:2112.13782] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. S. Fallows and S.F. Ross, Constraints on cosmologies inside black holes, JHEP 05 (2022) 094 [arXiv:2203.02523] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. C. Waddell, Bottom-up holographic models for cosmology, JHEP 09 (2022) 176 [arXiv:2203.03096] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. S. Antonini, P. Simidzija, B. Swingle and M. Van Raamsdonk, Cosmology from the vacuum, arXiv:2203.11220 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  21. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05 (2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  23. T. Azeyanagi, A. Karch, T. Takayanagi and E.G. Thompson, Holographic calculation of boundary entropy, JHEP 03 (2008) 054 [arXiv:0712.1850] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  24. S. Cooper, D. Neuenfeld, M. Rozali and D. Wakeham, Brane dynamics from the first law of entanglement, JHEP 03 (2020) 023 [arXiv:1912.05746] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. W. Reeves, M. Rozali, P. Simidzija, J. Sully, C. Waddell and D. Wakeham, Looking for (and not finding) a bulk brane, JHEP 12 (2021) 002 [arXiv:2108.10345] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. A. Belin, S. Biswas and J. Sully, The spectrum of boundary states in symmetric orbifolds, JHEP 01 (2022) 123 [arXiv:2110.05491] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. Y. Kusuki, Analytic bootstrap in 2D boundary conformal field theory: towards braneworld holography, JHEP 03 (2022) 161 [arXiv:2112.10984] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. T. Kawamoto, T. Mori, Y.-k. Suzuki, T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, Holographic local operator quenches in BCFTs, JHEP 05 (2022) 060 [arXiv:2203.03851] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. K. Izumi, T. Shiromizu, K. Suzuki, T. Takayanagi and N. Tanahashi, Brane dynamics of holographic BCFTs, JHEP 10 (2022) 050 [arXiv:2205.15500] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. T. Anous, M. Meineri, P. Pelliconi and J. Sonner, Sailing past the End of the World and discovering the Island, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022) 075 [arXiv:2202.11718] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J.E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 001 [arXiv:1911.09666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, O. Parrikar, G. Sárosi and T. Ugajin, Geometric secret sharing in a model of Hawking radiation, JHEP 01 (2021) 177 [arXiv:2003.05448] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. J. Sully, M.V. Raamsdonk and D. Wakeham, BCFT entanglement entropy at large central charge and the black hole interior, JHEP 03 (2021) 167 [arXiv:2004.13088] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. H. Geng and A. Karch, Massive islands, JHEP 09 (2020) 121 [arXiv:2006.02438] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  35. H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor, Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane, JHEP 10 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2006.04851] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  36. H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor, Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane, JHEP 12 (2020) 025 [arXiv:2010.00018] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  37. G. Grimaldi, J. Hernandez and R.C. Myers, Quantum extremal islands made easy. Part IV. Massive black holes on the brane, JHEP 03 (2022) 136 [arXiv:2202.00679] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  38. C. Krishnan, Critical Islands, JHEP 01 (2021) 179 [arXiv:2007.06551] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  39. F. Deng, J. Chu and Y. Zhou, Defect extremal surface as the holographic counterpart of Island formula, JHEP 03 (2021) 008 [arXiv:2012.07612] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  40. A. May and D. Wakeham, Quantum tasks require islands on the brane, Class. Quant. Grav. 38 (2021) 144001 [arXiv:2102.01810] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. S. Fallows and S.F. Ross, Islands and mixed states in closed universes, JHEP 07 (2021) 022 [arXiv:2103.14364] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. D. Neuenfeld, The Dictionary for Double Holography and Graviton Masses in d Dimensions, arXiv:2104.02801 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  43. H. Geng, S. Lüst, R.K. Mishra and D. Wakeham, Holographic BCFTs and Communicating Black Holes, jhep 08 (2021) 003 [arXiv:2104.07039] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  44. J. Chu, F. Deng and Y. Zhou, Page curve from defect extremal surface and island in higher dimensions, JHEP 10 (2021) 149 [arXiv:2105.09106] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  45. M. Miyaji, Island for gravitationally prepared state and pseudo entanglement wedge, JHEP 12 (2021) 013 [arXiv:2109.03830] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  46. E. Verheijden and E. Verlinde, From the BTZ black hole to JT gravity: geometrizing the island, JHEP 11 (2021) 092 [arXiv:2102.00922] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al., Entanglement phase structure of a holographic BCFT in a black hole background, JHEP 05 (2022) 153 [arXiv:2112.09132] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. K. Suzuki and T. Takayanagi, BCFT and Islands in two dimensions, JHEP 06 (2022) 095 [arXiv:2202.08462] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  49. L. Bianchi, S. De Angelis and M. Meineri, Radiation, entanglement and islands from a boundary local quench, arXiv:2203.10103 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  50. H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al., Jackiw-Teitelboim Gravity from the Karch-Randall Braneworld, arXiv:2206.04695 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  51. S. Chapman, D. Ge and G. Policastro, Holographic Complexity for Defects Distinguishes Action from Volume, JHEP 05 (2019) 049 [arXiv:1811.12549] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. S.F. Ross, Complexity and typical microstates, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 066014 [arXiv:1905.06211] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. Y. Sato and K. Watanabe, Does Boundary Distinguish Complexities?, JHEP 11 (2019) 132 [arXiv:1908.11094] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  54. P. Braccia, A.L. Cotrone and E. Tonni, Complexity in the presence of a boundary, JHEP 02 (2020) 051 [arXiv:1910.03489] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  55. J. Hernandez, R.C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan, Quantum extremal islands made easy. Part III. Complexity on the brane, JHEP 02 (2021) 173 [arXiv:2010.16398] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  56. F. Omidi, Regularizations of Action-Complexity for a Pure BTZ Black Hole Microstate, JHEP 07 (2020) 020 [arXiv:2004.11628] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  57. A. Bhattacharya, A. Bhattacharyya, P. Nandy and A.K. Patra, Islands and complexity of eternal black hole and radiation subsystems for a doubly holographic model, JHEP 05 (2021) 135 [arXiv:2103.15852] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. R. Auzzi, S. Baiguera, S. Bonansea and G. Nardelli, Action complexity in the presence of defects and boundaries, JHEP 02 (2022) 118 [arXiv:2112.03290] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  59. E. D’Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle, Exact half-BPS Type IIB interface solutions. I. Local solution and supersymmetric Janus, JHEP 06 (2007) 021 [arXiv:0705.0022] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  60. E. D’Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle, Exact half-BPS Type IIB interface solutions. II. Flux solutions and multi-Janus, JHEP 06 (2007) 022 [arXiv:0705.0024] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  61. M. Chiodaroli, E. D’Hoker and M. Gutperle, Holographic duals of Boundary CFTs, JHEP 07 (2012) 177 [arXiv:1205.5303] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  62. D. Bak, C. Kim, S.-H. Yi and J. Yoon, Unitarity of entanglement and islands in two-sided Janus black holes, JHEP 01 (2021) 155 [arXiv:2006.11717] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  63. C.F. Uhlemann, Islands and Page curves in 4d from Type IIB, JHEP 08 (2021) 104 [arXiv:2105.00008] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  64. M. Van Raamsdonk and C. Waddell, Finding AdS5 × S5 in 2 + 1 dimensional SCFT physics, JHEP 11 (2021) 145 [arXiv:2109.04479] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  65. G.R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati, 4-D gravity on a brane in 5-D Minkowski space, Phys. Lett. B 485 (2000) 208 [hep-th/0005016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  66. R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 343 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  67. C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 41 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  68. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  69. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  70. M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Lecture Notes in Physics 931, Springer (2017) [DOI] [arXiv:1609.01287] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  71. M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992) 1849 [hep-th/9204099] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  72. H. Liu and S.J. Suh, Entanglement Tsunami: Universal Scaling in Holographic Thermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 011601 [arXiv:1305.7244] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  73. H. Liu and S.J. Suh, Entanglement growth during thermalization in holographic systems, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 066012 [arXiv:1311.1200] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  74. T. Hartman and N. Afkhami-Jeddi, Speed Limits for Entanglement, arXiv:1512.02695 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  75. S. de Haro, S.N. Solodukhin and K. Skenderis, Holographic reconstruction of space-time and renormalization in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Commun. Math. Phys. 217 (2001) 595 [hep-th/0002230] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  76. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  77. S.S. Gubser, AdS/CFT and gravity, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 084017 [hep-th/9912001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  78. T. Nishioka, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Entanglement Entropy: An Overview, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 504008 [arXiv:0905.0932] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  79. J. Cardy and E. Tonni, Entanglement hamiltonians in two-dimensional conformal field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 1612 (2016) 123103 [arXiv:1608.01283] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  80. T. Grover, Certain general constraints on the many-body localization transition, arXiv:1405.1471. · arXiv
  81. V. Balasubramanian and P. Kraus, A Stress tensor for Anti-de Sitter gravity, Commun. Math. Phys. 208 (1999) 413 [hep-th/9902121] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  82. D. Grumiller, R. Ruzziconi and C. Zwikel, Generalized dilaton gravity in 2d, SciPost Phys. 12 (2022) 032 [arXiv:2109.03266] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  83. M. Mezei and J. Virrueta, The Quantum Null Energy Condition and Entanglement Entropy in Quenches, arXiv:1909.00919 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  84. T. Banks, P. Draper and B. Zhang, JT Gravity Coupled to Fermions, arXiv:2205.07382 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  85. T. Hartman, Y. Jiang and E. Shaghoulian, Islands in cosmology, JHEP 11 (2020) 111 [arXiv:2008.01022] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  86. R. Bousso and E. Wildenhain, Islands in closed and open universes, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 086012 [arXiv:2202.05278] [INSPIRE]. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
Lee, J. H., Neuenfeld, D., & Shukla, A.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2022-10-20
Volume
2022
Issue
10
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep10(2022)139
Cited by
15
References
6
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review