Cited by 187

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantum extremal islands made easy. Part II. Black holes on the brane

Chen, Hong Zhe, Myers, Robert C., Neuenfeld, Dominik, Reyes, Ignacio A., Sandor, Joshua·2020·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

We discuss holographic models of extremal and non-extremal black holes in contact with a bath in d dimensions, based on a brane world model introduced in [1]. The main benefit of our setup is that it allows for a high degree of analytic control as compared to previous work in higher dimensions. We show that the appearance of quantum extremal islands in those models is a consequence of the well-understood phase transition of RT surfaces, and does not make any direct reference to ensemble averaging. For non-extremal black holes the appearance of quantum extremal islands has the right behaviour to avoid the information paradox in any dimension. We further show that for these models the calculation of the full Page curve is possible in any dimension. The calculation reduces to numerically solving two ODEs. In the case of extremal black holes in higher dimensions, we find no quantum extremal islands for a wide range of parameters. In two dimensions, our results agree with [2] at leading order; however a finite UV cutoff introduced by the brane results in subleading corrections. For example, these corrections result in the quantum extremal surfaces moving further outward from the horizon, and shifting the Page transition to a slightly earlier time.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep12(2020)025

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • By applying doubly-holographic reasoning to higher-dimensional topological black holes, black strings, and de Sitter space, the prescription (7.6) yields unitary Page curves, except in cases where the horizon is extremal with a vanishing temperature.

    “By applying this doubly-holographic reasoning to higher-dimensional topological black holes [65], black strings [264,265], and de Sitter space [83,266], the prescription (7.6) yields unitary Page curves, except in cases where the horizon is extremal with a vanishing temperature.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [65]

  • In the context of topological black holes on the brane, the bulk is d+1-dimensional AdS-Rindler, for which the Rindler horizon induces a Rindler horizon on the brane.

    “Alternatively, one can study topological black holes on the brane, e.g.,[53,65].In this context, the bulk is d + 1-dimensional AdS-Rindler, for which the Rindler horizon induces a Rindler horizon on the brane.”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [65]

  • Holographic braneworlds confirm unitary Page curves arise in higher-dimensional gravity.

    “Originally achieved for models of two-dimensional dilaton gravity, 59 holographic braneworlds confirm unitary Page curves arise in higher-dimensional gravity [65,260].”

    From Three-Dimensional Quantum Black Holes: A Primer (2024) · cites this paper as [65]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 118

  1. H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor, Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane, JHEP 10 (2020) 166 [arXiv:2006.04851] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  2. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena, Islands outside the horizon, arXiv:1910.11077 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  3. J. Polchinski, The Black Hole Information Problem, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: New Frontiers in Fields and Strings, pp. 353–397, 2017, DOI [arXiv:1609.04036] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  4. D. Harlow, Jerusalem Lectures on Black Holes and Quantum Information, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 (2016) 015002 [arXiv:1409.1231] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. S.D. Mathur, The Information paradox: A Pedagogical introduction, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009) 224001 [arXiv:0909.1038] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  6. J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and the second law, Nuovo Cim. Lett. 4 (1972) 737. · DOI · Paper page
  7. J.D. Bekenstein, Black holes and entropy, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2333 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  8. S.W. Hawking, Black Holes and Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 13 (1976) 191 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  9. A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole, JHEP 12 (2019) 063 [arXiv:1905.08762] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  10. S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, Holographic Entanglement Entropy, vol. 931. Springer, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0 [arXiv:1609.01287] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  12. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  13. N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime, JHEP 01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  14. J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk and D. Wakeham, BCFT entanglement entropy at large central charge and the black hole interior, arXiv:2004.13088 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  15. Y. Chen, Pulling Out the Island with Modular Flow, JHEP 03 (2020) 033 [arXiv:1912.02210] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. T. Anegawa and N. Iizuka, Notes on islands in asymptotically flat 2d dilaton black holes, JHEP 07 (2020) 036 [arXiv:2004.01601] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar, O. Parrikar, G. Sárosi and T. Ugajin, Geometric secret sharing in a model of Hawking radiation, arXiv:2003.05448 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  18. T. Hartman, E. Shaghoulian and A. Strominger, Islands in Asymptotically Flat 2D Gravity, JHEP 07 (2020) 022 [arXiv:2004.13857] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. T.J. Hollowood and S.P. Kumar, Islands and Page Curves for Evaporating Black Holes in JT Gravity, JHEP 08 (2020) 094 [arXiv:2004.14944] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  20. M. Alishahiha, A. Faraji Astaneh and A. Naseh, Island in the Presence of Higher Derivative Terms, arXiv:2005.08715 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  21. A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J.E. Santos, Entanglement islands in higher dimensions, SciPost Phys. 9 (2020) 001 [arXiv:1911.09666] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and Y. Matsuo, Islands in Schwarzschild black holes, JHEP 06 (2020) 085 [arXiv:2004.05863] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  23. H. Geng and A. Karch, Massive islands, JHEP 09 (2020) 121 [arXiv:2006.02438] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. D. Bak, C. Kim, S.-H. Yi and J. Yoon, Unitarity of Entanglement and Islands in Two-Sided Janus Black Holes, arXiv:2006.11717 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  25. T. Li, J. Chu and Y. Zhou, Reflected Entropy for an Evaporating Black Hole, JHEP 11 (2020) 155 [arXiv:2006.10846] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. V. Chandrasekaran, M. Miyaji and P. Rath, Including contributions from entanglement islands to the reflected entropy, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 086009 [arXiv:2006.10754] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. T.J. Hollowood, S. Prem Kumar and A. Legramandi, Hawking Radiation Correlations of Evaporating Black Holes in JT Gravity, J. Phys. A 53 (2020) 475401 [arXiv:2007.04877] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  28. R. Bousso and M. Tomašević, Unitarity From a Smooth Horizon?, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 106019 [arXiv:1911.06305] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  29. C. Akers, N. Engelhardt and D. Harlow, Simple holographic models of black hole evaporation, JHEP 08 (2020) 032 [arXiv:1910.00972] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. Y. Chen, X.-L. Qi and P. Zhang, Replica wormhole and information retrieval in the SYK model coupled to Majorana chains, JHEP 06 (2020) 121 [arXiv:2003.13147] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. I. Kim, E. Tang and J. Preskill, The ghost in the radiation: Robust encodings of the black hole interior, JHEP 06 (2020) 031 [arXiv:2003.05451] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  32. H. Verlinde, ER = EPR revisited: On the Entropy of an Einstein-Rosen Bridge, arXiv:2003.13117 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  33. H. Liu and S. Vardhan, A dynamical mechanism for the Page curve from quantum chaos, arXiv:2002.05734 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  34. R. Bousso and E. Wildenhain, Gravity/ensemble duality, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 066005 [arXiv:2006.16289] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  35. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar and T. Ugajin, Entanglement between two disjoint universes, arXiv:2008.05274 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  36. D. Stanford, More quantum noise from wormholes, arXiv:2008.08570 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  37. S. Cooper, M. Rozali, B. Swingle, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell and D. Wakeham, Black Hole Microstate Cosmology, JHEP 07 (2019) 065 [arXiv:1810.10601] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  38. T. Hartman, Y. Jiang and E. Shaghoulian, Islands in cosmology, JHEP 11 (2020) 111 [arXiv:2008.01022] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  39. S.B. Giddings and G.J. Turiaci, Wormhole calculus, replicas, and entropies, JHEP 09 (2020) 194 [arXiv:2004.02900] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  40. Y. Chen, V. Gorbenko and J. Maldacena, Bra-ket wormholes in gravitationally prepared states, arXiv:2007.16091 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  41. M. Van Raamsdonk, Comments on wormholes, ensembles, and cosmology, arXiv:2008.02259 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  42. W. Sybesma, Pure de Sitter space and the island moving back in time, arXiv:2008.07994 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  43. V. Balasubramanian, A. Kar and T. Ugajin, Islands in de Sitter space, arXiv:2008.05275 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  44. T. Takayanagi, Holographic Dual of BCFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 101602 [arXiv:1105.5165] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni, Aspects of AdS/BCFT, JHEP 11 (2011) 043 [arXiv:1108.5152] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  46. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370 [hep-ph/9905221] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  47. L. Randall and R. Sundrum, An Alternative to compactification, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4690 [hep-th/9906064] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  48. A. Karch and L. Randall, Locally localized gravity, JHEP 05 (2001) 008 [hep-th/0011156] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  49. G.R. Dvali, G. Gabadadze and M. Porrati, 4 − D gravity on a brane in 5 − D Minkowski space, Phys. Lett. B 485 (2000) 208 [hep-th/0005016] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  50. E. D’Hoker, J. Estes and M. Gutperle, Exact half-BPS Type IIB interface solutions. II. Flux solutions and multi-Janus, JHEP 06 (2007) 022 [arXiv:0705.0024] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  51. M. Chiodaroli, M. Gutperle and D. Krym, Half-BPS Solutions locally asymptotic to AdS3 × S3 and interface conformal field theories, JHEP 02 (2010) 066 [arXiv:0910.0466] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. M. Chiodaroli, E. D’Hoker, Y. Guo and M. Gutperle, Exact half-BPS string-junction solutions in six-dimensional supergravity, JHEP 12 (2011) 086 [arXiv:1107.1722] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. R.M. Wald, Black hole entropy is the Noether charge, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 3427 [gr-qc/9307038] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  54. V. Iyer and R.M. Wald, Some properties of Noether charge and a proposal for dynamical black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 846 [gr-qc/9403028] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  55. T. Jacobson, G. Kang and R.C. Myers, On black hole entropy, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6587 [gr-qc/9312023] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  56. X. Dong, Holographic Entanglement Entropy for General Higher Derivative Gravity, JHEP 01 (2014) 044 [arXiv:1310.5713] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  57. M. Headrick, Entanglement Renyi entropies in holographic theories, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 126010 [arXiv:1006.0047] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  58. T. Faulkner, The Entanglement Renyi Entropies of Disjoint Intervals in AdS/CFT, arXiv:1303.7221 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  59. T. Hartman, Entanglement Entropy at Large Central Charge, arXiv:1303.6955 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  60. M. Porrati, Mass and gauge invariance 4. Holography for the Karch-Randall model, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 044015 [hep-th/0109017] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  61. A. Karch, E. Katz and L. Randall, Absence of a VVDZ discontinuity in AdS(AdS), JHEP 12 (2001) 016 [hep-th/0106261] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  62. M. Porrati, Higgs phenomenon for 4 − D gravity in anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 04 (2002) 058 [hep-th/0112166] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  63. O. Aharony, O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman and A. Karch, Defect conformal field theory and locally localized gravity, JHEP 07 (2003) 030 [hep-th/0303249] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  64. A. Miemiec, A Power law for the lowest eigenvalue in localized massive gravity, Fortsch. Phys. 49 (2001) 747 [hep-th/0011160] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  65. M.D. Schwartz, The Emergence of localized gravity, Phys. Lett. B 502 (2001) 223 [hep-th/0011177] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  66. G.W. Gibbons and S.W. Hawking, Action Integrals and Partition Functions in Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2752 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  67. W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Nuovo Cim. B 44 (1966) 1. · DOI · Paper page
  68. A. Buchel, J. Escobedo, R.C. Myers, M.F. Paulos, A. Sinha and M. Smolkin, Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions, JHEP 03 (2010) 111 [arXiv:0911.4257] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  69. S.S. Gubser, AdS/CFT and gravity, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 084017 [hep-th/9912001] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  70. R.B. Mann, Pair production of topological anti-de Sitter black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) L109 [gr-qc/9607071] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  71. D. Birmingham, Topological black holes in Anti-de Sitter space, Class. Quant. Grav. 16 (1999) 1197 [hep-th/9808032] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  72. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  73. R.C. Myers, Stress tensors and Casimir energies in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 046002 [hep-th/9903203] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  74. S. Chapman, H. Marrochio and R.C. Myers, Complexity of Formation in Holography, JHEP 01 (2017) 062 [arXiv:1610.08063] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  75. H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036 [arXiv:1102.0440] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  76. T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time Evolution of Entanglement Entropy from Black Hole Interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  77. S. Deser and O. Levin, Accelerated detectors and temperature in (anti)-de Sitter spaces, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) L163 [gr-qc/9706018] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  78. T. Jacobson, Comment on ‘Accelerated detectors and temperature in anti-de Sitter spaces’, Class. Quant. Grav. 15 (1998) 251 [gr-qc/9709048] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  79. M. Parikh and P. Samantray, Rindler-AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2018) 129 [arXiv:1211.7370] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  80. P. Krtous and A. Zelnikov, Minimal surfaces and entanglement entropy in anti-de Sitter space, JHEP 10 (2014) 077 [arXiv:1406.7659] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  81. S.D. Mathur, What is the dual of two entangled CFTs?, arXiv:1402.6378 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  82. M. Mezei and D. Stanford, On entanglement spreading in chaotic systems, JHEP 05 (2017) 065 [arXiv:1608.05101] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  83. H. Liu and S.J. Suh, Entanglement Tsunami: Universal Scaling in Holographic Thermalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 011601 [arXiv:1305.7244] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  84. H. Liu and S.J. Suh, Entanglement growth during thermalization in holographic systems, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 066012 [arXiv:1311.1200] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  85. D.A. Roberts, D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Localized shocks, JHEP 03 (2015) 051 [arXiv:1409.8180] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  86. E. Perlmutter, Bounding the Space of Holographic CFTs with Chaos, JHEP 10 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1602.08272] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  87. Y. Ahn, V. Jahnke, H.-S. Jeong and K.-Y. Kim, Scrambling in Hyperbolic Black Holes: shock waves and pole-skipping, JHEP 10 (2019) 257 [arXiv:1907.08030] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  88. T. Hartman and N. Afkhami-Jeddi, Speed Limits for Entanglement, arXiv:1512.02695 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  89. S.N. Solodukhin, Entanglement entropy, conformal invariance and extrinsic geometry, Phys. Lett. B 665 (2008) 305 [arXiv:0802.3117] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  90. K. Skenderis and S.N. Solodukhin, Quantum effective action from the AdS /CFT correspondence, Phys. Lett. B 472 (2000) 316 [hep-th/9910023] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  91. R. Jackiw, Lower Dimensional Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 252 (1985) 343 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  92. C. Teitelboim, Gravitation and Hamiltonian Structure in Two Space-Time Dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 41 [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  93. H.Z. Chen, Z. Fisher, J. Hernandez, R.C. Myers and S.-M. Ruan, Information Flow in Black Hole Evaporation, JHEP 03 (2020) 152 [arXiv:1911.03402] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  94. J. Maldacena, D. Stanford and Z. Yang, Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two dimensional Nearly Anti-de-Sitter space, PTEP 2016 (2016) 12C104 [arXiv:1606.01857] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  95. P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  96. M. Headrick, General properties of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 03 (2014) 085 [arXiv:1312.6717] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  97. J. Maldacena and D. Stanford, Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 106002 [arXiv:1604.07818] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  98. S. Sachdev, Holographic metals and the fractionalized Fermi liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 151602 [arXiv:1006.3794] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  99. P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford, JT gravity as a matrix integral, arXiv:1903.11115 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  100. A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP 08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  101. X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani, Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP 11 (2016) 028 [arXiv:1607.07506] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  102. J.S. Cotler, G. Gur-Ari, M. Hanada, J. Polchinski, P. Saad, S.H. Shenker et al., Black Holes and Random Matrices, JHEP 05 (2017) 118 [Erratum ibid. 09 (2018) 002] [arXiv:1611.04650] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  103. P. Saad, Late Time Correlation Functions, Baby Universes, and ETH in JT Gravity, arXiv:1910.10311 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  104. J.M. Maldacena and L. Maoz, Wormholes in AdS, JHEP 02 (2004) 053 [hep-th/0401024] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  105. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [arXiv:1506.02669] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  106. T. Shimaji, T. Takayanagi and Z. Wei, Holographic Quantum Circuits from Splitting/Joining Local Quenches, JHEP 03 (2019) 165 [arXiv:1812.01176] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  107. B. Czech, J.L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 155009 [arXiv:1204.1330] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  108. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  109. T. Faulkner and A. Lewkowycz, Bulk locality from modular flow, JHEP 07 (2017) 151 [arXiv:1704.05464] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  110. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An Apologia for Firewalls, JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [arXiv:1304.6483] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  111. B. Swingle, Entanglement Renormalization and Holography, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065007 [arXiv:0905.1317] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  112. F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [arXiv:1503.06237] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  113. P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang, Holographic duality from random tensor networks, JHEP 11 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1601.01694] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  114. B. Czech, P.H. Nguyen and S. Swaminathan, A defect in holographic interpretations of tensor networks, JHEP 03 (2017) 090 [arXiv:1612.05698] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  115. X. Dong, X.-L. Qi, Z. Shangnan and Z. Yang, Effective entropy of quantum fields coupled with gravity, JHEP 10 (2020) 052 [arXiv:2007.02987] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  116. D. Stanford and L. Susskind, Complexity and Shock Wave Geometries, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 126007 [arXiv:1406.2678] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  117. A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Holographic Complexity Equals Bulk Action?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 191301 [arXiv:1509.07876] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  118. A.R. Brown, D.A. Roberts, L. Susskind, B. Swingle and Y. Zhao, Complexity, action, and black holes, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 086006 [arXiv:1512.04993] [INSPIRE]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, H. Z., Myers, R. C., Neuenfeld, D., Reyes, I. A., & Sandor, J.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2020-12
Volume
2020
Issue
12
ISSN
1029-8479
Cited by
187
References
26
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review