Cited by 36

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thin-shell bubbles and information loss problem in anti de Sitter background

Sasaki, Misao, Yeom, Dong-han·2014·Journal of High Energy Physics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep12(2014)155

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The existence condition of the bounce solution in the SAdS case is Δ > 1, consistent with [5,6].

    “The existence condition of the bounce solution in this case is ∆ > 1, which is consistent with the condition given in [5,6].”
  • The bubble nucleation process that describes the complete evaporation of the Schwarzschild AdS black hole has the same probability as the Hawking-Page phase transition from the black hole to thermal radiation.

    “Interestingly, the bubble nucleation process that describes the complete evaporation of the Schwarzschild AdS black hole is found to have the same probability with that of the Hawking-Page phase transition from the black hole to the thermal radiation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. J.M. Maldacena, The large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [ hep-th/9711200 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. T. Banks, L. Susskind and M.E. Peskin, Difficulties for the evolution of pure states into mixed states, Nucl. Phys. B 244 (1984) 125 [ INSPIRE ].
  3. D.-h. Yeom and H. Zoe, Constructing a counterexample to the black hole complementarity, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 104008 [ arXiv:0802.1625 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  4. D.-h. Yeom, Reviews and perspectives on black hole complementarity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1 (2011) 311 [ arXiv:0901.1929 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  5. S.E. Hong, D.-i. Hwang, E.D. Stewart and D.-h. Yeom, The causal structure of dynamical charged black holes, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 045014 [ arXiv:0808.1709 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  6. D.-h. Yeom and H. Zoe, Semi-classical black holes with large-N re-scaling and information loss problem, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 3287 [ arXiv:0907.0677 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  7. D.-i. Hwang, B.-H. Lee and D.-h. Yeom, Is the firewall consistent?: Gedanken experiments on black hole complementarity and firewall proposal, JCAP 01 (2013) 005 [ arXiv:1210.6733 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  8. W. Kim, B.-H. Lee and D.-H. Yeom, Black hole complementarity and firewall in two dimensions, JHEP 05 (2013) 060 [ arXiv:1301.5138 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  9. B.-H. Lee and D.-h. Yeom, Status report: black hole complementarity controversy, Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 246-247 (2014) 178 [ arXiv:1302.6006 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  10. A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, D. Stanford and J. Sully, An apologia for firewalls, JHEP 09 (2013) 018 [ arXiv:1304.6483 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  11. A. Ashtekar and M. Bojowald, Black hole evaporation: A Paradigm, Class. Quant. Grav. 22 (2005) 3349 [ gr-qc/0504029 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  12. L. Modesto, Disappearance of black hole singularity in quantum gravity, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 124009 [ gr-qc/0407097 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  13. S.A. Hayward, Formation and evaporation of regular black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 031103 [ gr-qc/0506126 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  14. S.B. Giddings, Constraints on black hole remnants, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 947 [ hep-th/9304027 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  15. S.B. Giddings, Comments on information loss and remnants, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 4078 [ hep-th/9310101 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  16. S.B. Giddings, Why aren’t black holes infinitely produced?, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 6860 [ hep-th/9412159 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  17. S.B. Giddings, Black holes and massive remnants, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 1347 [ hep-th/9203059 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  18. S.D. Mathur, The fuzzball proposal for black holes: an elementary review, Fortsch. Phys. 53 (2005) 793 [ hep-th/0502050 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  19. W. Fischler, D. Morgan and J. Polchinski, Quantum nucleation of false vacuum bubbles, Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 2638 [ INSPIRE ].
  20. W. Fischler, D. Morgan and J. Polchinski, Quantization of false vacuum bubbles: a hamiltonian treatment of gravitational tunneling, Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 4042 [ INSPIRE ].
  21. D.-h. Yeom, Generation of a bubble universe and the information loss problem, arXiv:0912.0068 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  22. B.-H. Lee, W. Lee and D.-h. Yeom, Dynamics of false vacuum bubbles in Brans-Dicke theory, JCAP 01 (2011) 005 [ arXiv:1006.3127 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  23. D.-i. Hwang and D.-h. Yeom, Generation of a bubble universe using a negative energy bath, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 155003 [ arXiv:1010.3834 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  24. B.-H. Lee and D.-h. Yeom, Nucleation and evolution of false vacuum bubbles in scalar-tensor gravity, Nuovo Cim. C 036 (2013) 79 [ arXiv:1111.0139 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  25. G.T. Horowitz and J.M. Maldacena, The black hole final state, JHEP 02 (2004) 008 [ hep-th/0310281 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  26. J. Smolin and J. Oppenheim, Information locking in black holes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 081302 [ hep-th/0507287 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  27. D. Gottesman and J. Preskill, Comment on ‘The black hole final state’, JHEP 03 (2004) 026 [ hep-th/0311269 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  28. S.E. Hong, D.-i. Hwang, D.-h. Yeom and H. Zoe, Black hole complementarity with local horizons and Horowitz-Maldacena’s proposal, JHEP 12 (2008) 080 [ arXiv:0809.1480 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  29. D.-h. Yeom and H. Zoe, Black hole complementarity gets troubled with a dynamical charged black hole, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 63 (2013) 1109 [ arXiv:0811.1637 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  30. J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in Anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [ hep-th/0106112 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  31. S.W. Hawking, Information loss in black holes, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 084013 [ hep-th/0507171 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  32. S.W. Hawking, Information preservation and weather forecasting for black holes, arXiv:1401.5761 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  33. B. Freivogel et al., Inflation in AdS/CFT, JHEP 03 (2006) 007 [ hep-th/0510046 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  34. W. Israel, Singular hypersurfaces and thin shells in general relativity, Nuovo Cim. B 44S10 (1966) 1 [Erratum ibid. B 48 (1967) 463] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  35. S. Ansoldi, A. Aurilia, R. Balbinot and E. Spallucci, Classical and quantum shell dynamics and vacuum decay, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) 2727 [ gr-qc/9706081 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  36. J.B. Hartle, S.W. Hawking and T. Hertog, The classical universes of the no-boundary quantum state, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 123537 [ arXiv:0803.1663 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  37. D.-i. Hwang, H. Sahlmann and D.-h. Yeom, The no-boundary measure in scalar-tensor gravity, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 095005 [ arXiv:1107.4653 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  38. D.-i. Hwang, B.-H. Lee, H. Sahlmann and D.-h. Yeom, The no-boundary measure in string theory: applications to moduli stabilization, flux compactification and cosmic landscape, Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 175001 [ arXiv:1203.0112 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  39. L. Susskind, The anthropic landscape of string theory, hep-th/0302219 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sasaki, M., & Yeom, D.-H.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2014-12
Volume
2014
Issue
12
ISSN
1029-8479
Cited by
36
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review