CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1,471Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect

Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?

Open access
Almheiri, Ahmed, Marolf, Donald, Polchinski, Joseph, Sully, James·2012·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1207.3123arXiv 1207.3123
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We argue that the following three statements cannot all be true: (i) Hawking radiation is in a pure state, (ii) the information carried by the radiation is emitted from the region near the horizon, with low energy effective field theory valid beyond some microscopic distance from the horizon, and (iii) the infalling observer encounters nothing unusual at the horizon. Perhaps the most conservative resolution is that the infalling observer burns up at the horizon. Alternatives would seem to require novel dynamics that nevertheless cause notable violations of semiclassical physics at macroscopic distances from the horizon.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1207.3123

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is impossible to fix the information problem by adding small corrections to the Hawking process by slightly modifying the Hamiltonian or state of the quantum fields near the horizon.

    “In particular, it is impossible to fix the problem by adding small corrections to the Hawking process by slightly modifying the Hamiltonian or state of the quantum fields near the horizon [62-64].”

    From The entropy of Hawking radiation (2021) · cites this paper as [63]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [2][2] L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, 'The Stretched horizon and black hole complementarity,' Phys. Rev. D 48 , 3743 (1993) [hep-th/9306069]. - · arXiv
  2. [4][4] L. Susskind and L. Thorlacius, 'Gedanken experiments involving black holes,' Phys. Rev. D 49 , 966 (1994) [hep-th/9308100]. - · arXiv
  3. [9][9] J. L. F. Barbon and J. M. Magan, 'Chaotic Fast Scrambling At Black Holes,' Phys. Rev. D 84 , 106012 (2011) [arXiv:1105.2581 [hep-th]]. - · arXiv
  4. [10][10] N. Lashkari, D. Stanford, M. Hastings, T. Osborne and P. Hayden, 'Towards the Fast Scrambling Conjecture,' arXiv:1111.6580 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  5. [11][11] S. B. Giddings, 'Models for unitary black hole disintegration,' Phys. Rev. D 85 , 044038 (2012) [arXiv:1108.2015 [hep-th]]; S. B. Giddings, 'Black holes, quantum information, and unitary evolution,' arXiv:1201.1037 [hep-th]; S. B. Giddings and Y. Shi, 'Quantum information transfer and models for black hole mechanics,' arXiv:1205.4732 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  6. [15][15] S. G. Avery, 'Qubit Models of Black Hole Evaporation,' arXiv:1109.2911 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  7. [17][17] S. L. Braunstein, 'Black hole entropy as entropy of entanglement, or it's curtains for the equivalence principle,' arXiv:0907.1190v1 [quant-ph]]; S. L. Braunstein, S. Pirandola and K. Zyczkowski, 'Entangled black holes as ciphers of hidden information,' Physical Review Letters 110, 101301 (2013) [arXiv:0907.1190v3 [quant-ph]]. - · arXiv
  8. [19][19] Y. Nomura, J. Varela and S. J. Weinberg, 'Complementarity Endures: No Firewall for an Infalling Observer,' arXiv:1207.6626 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  9. [20][20] L. Susskind, 'Singularities, Firewalls, and Complementarity,' arXiv:1208.3445 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  10. [25][25] P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola, 'Gravitational condensate stars: An alternative to black holes,' gr-qc/0109035. - · arXiv
  11. [26][26] A. Davidson, 'Holographic Shell Model: Stack Data Structure inside Black Holes,' arXiv:1108.2650 [gr-qc]. - · arXiv
  12. [27][27] S. D. Mathur and D. Turton, 'Comments on black holes I: The possibility of complementarity,' arXiv:1208.2005 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  13. [30][30] A. R. Brown, 'Tensile Strength and the Mining of Black Holes,' arXiv:1207.3342 [gr-qc]. - · arXiv
  14. [33][33] D. A. Lowe and L. Thorlacius, 'Comments on the black hole information problem,' Phys. Rev. D 73 , 104027 (2006) [hep-th/0601059]. - · arXiv
  15. [37][37] A. E. Lawrence and E. J. Martinec, 'Black hole evaporation along macroscopic strings,' Phys. Rev. D 50 , 2680 (1994) [hep-th/9312127]. - · arXiv
  16. [38][38] V. P. Frolov and D. Fursaev, 'Mining energy from a black hole by strings,' Phys. Rev. D 63 , 124010 (2001) [hep-th/0012260]. - · arXiv
  17. [39][39] Black Holes: The Membrane Paradigm, R. Price, K. Thorne, D.A. MacDonald, eds. (Yale University Press, 1986), Section VII.E.1. -
  18. [40][40] A. J. Amsel, D. Marolf and A. Virmani, 'The Physical Process First Law for Bifurcate Killing Horizons,' Phys. Rev. D 77 , 024011 (2008) [arXiv:0708.2738 [gr-qc]]. - · arXiv
  19. [41][41] B. Carter, 'The general theory of mechanical, electromagnetic and thermodynamic properties of black holes,' in General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey, S.W. Hawking and W. Israel, eds. (Cambridge University Press, 1979). R.M. Wald, 'Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime and Black Hole Thermodynamics,' University of Chicago Press, (1994). T. Jacobson, 'On the nature of black hole entropy,' in General Relativity and Relativistic Astrophysics: Eighth Canadian Conference, Eds. C. P. Burgess and R. C. Myers, (Aip Conference Proceedings, 2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/9908031]. - · arXiv
  20. [45][45] R. Bousso, 'Observer Complementarity Upholds the Equivalence Principle,' arXiv:1207.5192 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  21. [46][46] D. Harlow, 'Complementarity, not Firewalls,' arXiv:1207.6243 [hep-th]. - · arXiv
  22. [47][47] B. D. Chowdhury and A. Puhm, 'Is Alice burning or fuzzing?,' arXiv:1208.2026 [hepth]. 6. (1968) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Almheiri, A., Marolf, D., Polchinski, J., & Sully, J.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Polchinski, Joseph
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2012
Volume
2013
Issue
2
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1207.3123
arXiv
1207.3123
OpenAlex
W2042072504
Cited by
1,471
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 114 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 88 · 2022: 117 · 2021: 117 · 2020: 122 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 150 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 118 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 48
FWCI
58.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
Keywords
black holes, black hole complementarity, firewall, Hawking radiation, black hole information paradox, event horizon, infalling observer, effective field theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review