Cited by 7Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationHealth, psychology, and well-being

Brief scales for measurement of functional social support and psychological resources in French-speaking adults

Bovier, Patrick A., Chamot, Eric, Perneger, Thomas V.·2002·Sozial- und Präventivmedizin¶Social and Preventive Medicine¶Médecine social et préventive

Abstract

Objectives Psychological resources and social support are important determinants of health, but brief and validated scales measuring these dimensions in French are lacking.Methods Instruments measuring self-esteem and mastery, and affective and confident social support were administered by mail to 1257 university students. Factor analysis, internal consistency statistics, and correlations with related variables were used to derive abbreviated scales and confirm their validity.Results Factor analysis and item reduction yielded four brief scales: mastery (4 items), self-esteem (4 items), affective social support (2 items), and problem-solving social support (4 items). All four scales had few missing items and adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha > 0.70). All scores were associated with self-reported general health, and with visits to mental health specialists. Scores of self-esteem and mastery were also associated with physician visits (inversely), and confidence in finishing studies and finding a job. Scores of affective and confident social support correlated with the intensity of social activities and the number of people the respondent could count on.Conclusions The abbreviated scales retained adequate psychometric properties and may be usefully applied in health research among similar French-speaking populations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/pl00012640

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bovier, P. A., Chamot, E., & Perneger, T. V.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Venue
Sozial- und Präventivmedizin¶Social and Preventive Medicine¶Médecine social et préventive
Published
2002-11
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
298-306
ISSN
0303-8408 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077134989
Cited by
7
References
10
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
social support, psychological resources, self-esteem, mastery, French-speaking adults, scale shortening, psychometric validation, university students, health status, social activity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Health Status, Humans, Language, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research, Self Concept, Sex Factors, Social Support, Students, Switzerland, Marital Status

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review