Cited by 311Student Stress and CopingHealth and Well-being StudiesResilience and Mental Health

Perceived stress, internal resources, and social support as determinants of mental health among young adults

Bovier, Patrick A., Chamot, Eric, Perneger, Thomas V.·2004·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Background Mental health is a central determinant of quality of life. While psychiatric morbidity of populations has been studied extensively, the role of perceived stress, social support, and internal resources as determinant of health is still poorly understood.Methods We surveyed 2000 randomly selected university students. Perceived stress was measured by the Brief Encounter Psychosocial Instrument, social support by the Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire, internal resources (mastery and self-esteem) by a brief version of the Pearlin coping questionnaire. Linear regression models were used to explore the relationships between these variables and mental health, based on the SF-12 health survey.Results After two reminders, 1257 students answered the questionnaire. In bivariate analysis, mental health was negatively associated with stress and positively associated with internal resources and social support (all p-values < 0.001). In multiple regression analysis, internal resources were positively associated with mental health, and buffered the negative impact of stress on mental health. Internal resources and stress mediated the positive impact of social support on mental health.Conclusions Our data confirm that perceived stress is an important risk factor for low mental health and suggest that mastery and self-esteem are important protective factors of mental health among young adults.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/b:qure.0000015288.43768.e4

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bovier, P. A., Chamot, E., & Perneger, T. V.
Affiliations
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Bovier, Patrick A.
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2004-02
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
161-170
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W2011713251
Cited by
311
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 11
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
perceived stress, social support, internal resources, mental health, young adults, university students, mastery, self-esteem, coping, buffering effect
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Self Concept, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Students, Switzerland, Universities, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review