Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): We don’t leave women alone.
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pandemic may primarily affect women by potentially increasing their burden at home, as they are usually informal family caregivers.
“Indeed, the pandemic may primarily affect women by potentially increasing their burden at home, as they are usually informal family caregivers (Mantovani et al., 2020; Rodríguez-Rey et al., 2020).”
From Dealing With the Pandemic of COVID-19 in Portugal: On the Important Role of Positivity, Experiential Avoidance, and Coping Strategies (2021) · cites this paper as Mantovani et al., 2020
In the main text (no page number supplied), Mantovani says school closures and quarantine could have different repercussions for women and men, and that women often have primary caregiving roles within families. This supports the concern about women’s potential burden at home, but the paper does not say the pandemic primarily affects women or explicitly state that their home burden will increase. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Chen, N., Zhou, M., Dong, X., Qu, J., Gong, F., Han, Y., Qiu, Y., Wang, J., Liu, Y., Wei, Y., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30211-7 · Cited by 21,415 · see citing works
COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak
Wenham, C., Smith, J., & Morgan, R. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30526-2 · Cited by 1,701 · see citing works
Sex difference and smoking predisposition in patients with COVID-19
Cai, H. “. (2020) · The Lancet Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30117-x · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Sex-based differences in drug activity.
Whitley, H. P., & Lindsey, W. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rodríguez-Rey, R., Garrido-Hernansaiz, H., & Collado, S. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01540 · Cited by 683 · see citing works
Microstructure, pathophysiology, and potential therapeutics of COVID‐19: A comprehensive review
Singh, S. P., Pritam, M., Pandey, B., & Yadav, T. P. (2021) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.26254 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
Ferreira, M. J., Sofia, R., Carreno, D. F., Eisenbeck, N., Jongenelen, I., & Cruz, J. F. A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.647984 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Ripoll, J., Contreras-Martos, S., Esteva, M., Soler, A., & Serrano-Ripoll, M. J. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm10143191 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mantovani, A., Dalbeni, A., & Beatrice, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Verona (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Mantovani, Alessandro
- Venue
- International Journal of Public Health
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 235-236
- ISSN
- 1661-8556 (ISSN-L)
- 1661-8564
- PMC
- PMC7147358
- OpenAlex
- W3015454434
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Gender, Health, and Social Inequality
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Studies and Social Issues
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, women, gender, health disparities, pandemic response
- MeSH terms
- Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
