Cited by 117Diabetes Management and EducationCancer survivorship and careDiabetes Management and Research

Differentiating symptoms of depression from diabetes-specific distress: relationships with self-care in type 2 diabetes

Open access
Gonzalez, J. S., Delahanty, L. M., Safren, S. A., Meigs, J. B., Grant, R. W.·2008·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesisThe aim of this study was to examine the relationship between depressive symptoms and diabetes-specific distress and the independent relationships of each of these factors with diabetes self-care. We expected that symptoms of depression would be associated with poorer diabetes self-care, independent of diabetes-specific distress.MethodsWe surveyed 848 primary care patients with type 2 diabetes using the Harvard Department of Psychiatry/National Depression Screening Day Scale (HANDS), Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (PAID), Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities, and self-reported medication adherence.ResultsThe PAID and HANDS scores were positively correlated in the overall sample (r=0.54, p<0.0001), among those who did not meet diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) based on the HANDS screening result (n=685; r=0.36, p<0.001) and in patients who did meet the screening criteria for MDD (n=163; r=0.36, p<0.001). Higher PAID scores significantly predicted lower levels of diet, exercise and medication adherence (all p values <0.05). However, once depression symptom scores were entered into these models, most relationships were reduced to non-significance, while the HANDS score retained significant relationships with most indices of diabetes self-care. The same pattern of results was found in the subset of patients who did not screen positive for MDD.Conclusions/interpretationThese results suggest that specific symptoms of depression have a greater negative relationship with diabetes self-care than diabetes-specific distress, even among those patients who do not meet screening criteria for MDD. Interventions that focus on improving the management of specific symptoms of depression may be more effective in improving self-care than those that focus on reducing distress.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-008-1113-x

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 9 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    In models with PAID alone, higher PAID scores were significantly associated with less frequent exercise.

    “while higher PAID scores were significantly associated with poorer adherence to general dietary recommendations, less spacing of carbohydrates, less frequent exercise, and non-adherence to prescribed medication (when each subscale was examined individually)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    HANDS score did not reduce the relationship between PAID and high-fat food consumption.

    “HANDS score, which was unrelated to high-fat food consumption, did not reduce this relationship.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Among patients who did not meet HANDS criteria for MDD (n=685), PAID and HANDS scores were positively correlated (r=0.36, p<0.001).

    “among those who did not meet diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) based on the HANDS screening result (n=685; r=0.36, p<0.001)”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “in those patients who did not meet HANDS criteria for MDD (n=685; r=0.36, p<0.001)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    HANDS score was unrelated to high-fat food consumption.

    “HANDS score, which was unrelated to high-fat food consumption”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In models with PAID alone, higher PAID scores were significantly associated with less spacing of carbohydrates.

    “while higher PAID scores were significantly associated with poorer adherence to general dietary recommendations, less spacing of carbohydrates, less frequent exercise, and non-adherence to prescribed medication (when each subscale was examined individually)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims. 7
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S4 (based).

    Findingown data

    In models including both PAID and HANDS, higher HANDS scores remained significantly associated with each of the diabetes self-care outcomes, independent of PAID score.

    “In these models, higher levels of depressive symptoms remained significantly associated with each of the diabetes self-care outcomes, independent of PAID score.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “while the HANDS score retained significant relationships with most indices of diabetes self-care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the subsample of patients who did not meet MDD screening criteria, the pattern of relationships between PAID, HANDS and self-care was similar, except HANDS score was negatively related to high-fat food consumption.

    “These relationships were paralleled in the subsample of patients who did not meet screening criteria for MDD, except that HANDS score was negatively related to high-fat food consumption (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The HANDS and PAID each had high internal reliability (0.85 and 0.95, respectively).

    “Because the HANDS and PAID each had high internal reliability (0.85 and 0.95, respectively)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Measurement inconsistencies complicate the conceptualisation of depression in diabetes and call into question how depression, especially as measured by depressive symptom scales, differs from diabetes-specific distress.

    “Measurement inconsistencies complicate the conceptualisation of depression in diabetes and call into question how depression, especially as measured by depressive symptom scales, differs from diabetes-specific distress [1, 2].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan JT et al (2007) Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes: not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care 30:542–548 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Krichbaum M, Kubiak T, Haak T (2006) How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment. Diabetologia 49:469–477 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Longitudinal data support the directionality of the relationship and show that baseline symptoms of depression and increases in depressive symptoms over time are each significantly associated with worse diabetes self-care 9 months later, even when baseline levels of self-care are controlled.

    “we have recently published longitudinal data that support the directionality of this relationship and show that baseline symptoms of depression and increases in depressive symptoms over time are each significantly associated with worse diabetes self-care 9 months later, even when baseline levels of self-care are controlled [8].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Gonzalez JS, Safren SA, Delahanty LM, et al. Symptoms of depression prospectively predict poorer self-care in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2008.02535.x source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Symptoms of MDD and diabetes-specific distress are related but independent constructs, sharing 29% of variance in the overall sample and 13% among those not meeting MDD screening criteria.

    “Our findings suggest that while symptoms of MDD and diabetes-specific distress are related, sharing 29% of their variance in the overall sample and 13% among those who did not meet screening criteria for MDD, they are independent constructs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study is limited by use of self-reports for self-care, which may overestimate true levels.

    “Our study is limited by our use of self-reports for self-care, which may overestimate true levels.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Previously, Fisher and colleagues reported that diabetes-specific distress was a better predictor of diabetes self-care than symptoms of depression or a diagnosis of MDD.

    “Previously, Fisher and colleagues reported that diabetes-specific distress was a better predictor of diabetes self-care than symptoms of depression or a diagnosis of MDD [1].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan JT et al (2007) Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes: not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care 30:542–548 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    All models controlled for the same set of covariates as in the previous report to avoid potential demographic and illness-related confounding of measures of depression/diabetes-specific distress.

    “all models controlled for the same set of covariates as in our previous report to avoid potential demographic and illness-related confounding of measures of depression/diabetes-specific distress [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Gonzalez JS, Safren SA, Cagliero E et al (2007) Depression, self-care, and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: relationships across the full range of symptom severity. Diabetes Care 30:2222–2227 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The relationship between symptoms of depression and worse diabetes self-care is linear and extends to patients who do not meet screening criteria for MDD.

    “We previously reported that the relationship between symptoms of depression and worse diabetes self-care is linear and extends to patients who do not meet screening criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) [3].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Gonzalez JS, Safren SA, Cagliero E et al (2007) Depression, self-care, and medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: relationships across the full range of symptom severity. Diabetes Care 30:2222–2227 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Cross-sectional data from a relatively ethnically homogeneous sample limit causal inferences.

    “Further, these cross-sectional data, from a relatively ethnically homogeneous sample, limit causal inferences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The HANDS screens for MDD by assessing symptoms over the prior 2 weeks.

    “The HANDS screens for MDD by assessing symptoms over the prior 2 weeks [5].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Baer L, Jacobs DG, Meszler-Reizes J et al (2000) Development of a brief screening instrument: The HANDS. Psychother Psychosom 69:35–41 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The specific diet subscale was examined at the item level because of poor inter-item correlations.

    “The specific diet subscale, which includes fruit and vegetable consumption, high-fat food consumption and spacing of carbohydrates, was examined at the item level because of poor inter-item correlations [6].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Toobert DJ, Hampson SE, Glasgow RE (2000) The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care 23:943–950 source

      Not checked in the free run.

13 of 13
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this study, no data existed on the relationship between scores on a diagnostic symptom-based MDD screen and diabetes-specific distress, and the relationship of PAID scores to type 2 diabetes self-care independent of MDD symptoms had not been examined.

    “Data on the relationship between scores on a measure of diagnostic symptoms of MDD and diabetes-specific distress have not previously been available, and the relationship of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (PAID) scores to type 2 diabetes self-care, independent of MDD symptoms, has not been examined.”
1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonzalez, J. S., Delahanty, L. M., Safren, S. A., Meigs, J. B., & Grant, R. W.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Gonzalez, J. S.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2008-08-09
Volume
51
Issue
10
Pages
1822-1825
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2118613065
Cited by
117
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Sanofi
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01mh078571-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R01MH078571, R01 MH-078571)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK080140, DK067452, K24DK080140, K23DK067452)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
depression, type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-care, medication adherence, dietary adherence, exercise adherence, major depressive disorder, primary care patients, Problem Areas in Diabetes scale
MeSH terms
Depression, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Compliance, Self Care, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review