Cited by 84Mental Health Treatment and AccessPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and Psychology

Mental health service utilization in the United States

Goodwin, Renee D., Hoven, Christina W., Lyons, John S., Stein, Murray B.·2002·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between personality factors and the use of mental health services (past 12 months) among adults in the community.Method Data were drawn from the Midlife Development in the United States Survey (MIDUS), a representative sample of 3,032 adults aged 25-74 in the United States population. Analyses of variance and logistic regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between personality factors and mental health service utilization, in the presence and absence of mental disorders, during the past 12 months.Results Neuroticism [OR = 1.5 (1.2, 1.9)] was associated with significantly increased likelihood of mental health service utilization among adults in the community. Conscientiousness [OR = 0.7 (0.5, 0.9)] and extraversion [OR = 0.7 (0.5, 0.98)], in contrast, were associated with decreased likelihood of use of mental health services. Among adults with mental disorders, conscientiousness [OR = 0.5 (0.3, 0.8)] was associated with decreased odds of mental health service utilization. Neuroticism [OR = 1.8 (1.3, 2.4)] was associated with increased likelihood of service use among those who did not meet criteria for common mental disorders.Conclusions These findings are the first to document a significant association between personality factors and the use of mental health services among adults in the general population. Our results highlight new ways in which personality may influence mental health in the community. This information may be useful in identifying those with unmet need for mental health treatment and developing more effective interventions for those at risk for common mental disorders. Replication of these findings is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-002-0563-6

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goodwin, R. D., Hoven, C. W., Lyons, J. S., & Stein, M. B.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
37
Issue
12
Pages
561-566
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2101051579
Cited by
84
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
mental health service utilization, personality traits, neuroticism, conscientiousness, extraversion, Big Five personality traits, common mental disorders, unmet mental health needs, community-dwelling adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Personality, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review