Cited by 686Mental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMigration, Health and Trauma

Recent care of common mental disorders in the united states: Prevalence and conformance with evidence-based recommendations

Open access
Wang, Philip S., Berglund, Patricia, Kessler, Ronald C.·2000·Journal of General Internal Medicine

Abstract

Objective To relate the presence of recent mental disorders to use of mental health services.Design Cross-sectional survey.Study population The study population was 3,032 respondents to the Midlife Development in the United States (MIDUS) survey, a nationally representative telephone-and-mail survey conducted in 1996. Twelve-month diagnoses according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised, Third Edition, of major depressive episode, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and serious mental illness were made using a structured assessment. Information was obtained on 12-month treatment for mental health problems in the general medical, mental health specialty, human services, and self-help sectors. Definitions of treatments consistent with evidence-based recommendations were developed using available practice guidelines.Measurements and main results Crude and adjusted likelihoods of receiving any mental health care and guideline-concordant care were measured. Although 53. 8% of respondents with at least one 12-month mental disorder received any mental health care in the previous year, only 14.3% received care that could be considered consistent with evidence-based treatment recommendations. Even among those with the most serious and impairing mental illness, only 25% received guideline-concordant treatment. Predictors of receiving guideline-concordant care included being white, female, severely ill, and having mental health insurance coverage.Conclusions An epidemic of untreated and poorly treated mental disorders exists in the United States, especially among vulnerable groups such as African Americans and the underinsured. Cost-effective interventions are needed to improve both access to and quality of treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.9908044.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is wide variation in the use of evidence-based treatments in usual care.

    “An implementation research grant should cite service system research that demonstrates unmet need [15], the wide variation in the use of evidence-based treatments in usual care [16-19], or the association between the burden of disease and variations in the use of guidelines [20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kessler RC, McGonagle KA, Zhao S, et al. Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994;51:8-19.
  2. Greenberg PE, Stiglin LE, Finkelstein SN, Berndt ER. The eco- nomic burden of depression in 1990. J Clin Psychiatry. 1993;54: 405-18.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, P. S., Berglund, P., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Published
2000-05
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
284-292
ISSN
  • 0884-8734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-1497
OpenAlex
W1972523301
Cited by
686
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
FWCI
42.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (2k05mh000507-13)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K05 MH 00507, Z01MH000507)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
Keywords
mental health service utilization, guideline-concordant care, evidence-based treatment, major depressive episode, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, severe mental illness, mental health coverage, racial disparities, African Americans, underinsured, access to mental health care, mental health care quality, Midlife Development in the United States
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Prevalence, Chi-Square Distribution, Likelihood Functions, Logistic Models, Panic Disorder, Evidence-Based Medicine, Guideline Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review