Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corticosteroids in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Chaudhuri, Dipayan, Sasaki, Kiyoka, Karkar, Aram, Sharif, Sameer, Lewis, Kimberly, Mammen, Manoj J., Alexander, Paul, Ye, Zhikang, Lozano, Luis Enrique Colunga, Munch, Marie Warrer, Perner, Anders, Du, Bin, Mbuagbaw, Lawrence, Alhazzani, Waleed, Pastores, Stephen M., Marshall, John, Lamontagne, François, Annane, Djillali, Meduri, Gianfranco Umberto, Rochwerg, Bram·2021·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Corticosteroids are now recommended for patients with severe COVID-19 including those with COVID-related ARDS. This has generated renewed interest regarding whether corticosteroids should be used in non-COVID ARDS as well. The objective of this study was to summarize all RCTs examining the use of corticosteroids in ARDS. The protocol of this study was pre-registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020200659). We searched online databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CDC library of COVID research, CINAHL, and COCHRANE. We included RCTs that compared the effect of corticosteroids to placebo or usual care in adult patients with ARDS, including patients with COVID-19. Three reviewers abstracted data independently and in duplicate using a pre-specified standardized form. We assessed individual study risk of bias using the revised Cochrane ROB-2 tool and rated certainty in outcomes using GRADE methodology. We pooled data using a random effects model. The main outcome for this review was 28-day-mortality. We included 18 RCTs enrolling 2826 patients. The use of corticosteroids probably reduced mortality in patients with ARDS of any etiology (2740 patients in 16 trials, RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72–0.95, ARR 8.0%, 95% CI 2.2–12.5%, moderate certainty). Patients who received a longer course of corticosteroids (over 7 days) had higher rates of survival compared to a shorter course. The use of corticosteroids probably reduces mortality in patients with ARDS. This effect was consistent between patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS, corticosteroid types, and dosage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00134-021-06394-2

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Chaudhuri, D., Sasaki, K., Karkar, A., Sharif, S., Lewis, K., Mammen, M. J., Alexander, P., Ye, Z., Lozano, L. E. C., Munch, M. W., Perner, A., Du, B., Mbuagbaw, L., Alhazzani, W., Pastores, S. M., Marshall, J., Lamontagne, F., Annane, D., Meduri, G. U., & Rochwerg, B.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2021-04-19
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
521-537
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W3154855659
Cited by
299
References
36
FWCI
12.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticosteroids in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00134-021-06394-2
The paper
Chaudhuri, D., Sasaki, K., Karkar, A., Sharif, S., Lewis, K., Mammen, M. J., Alexander, P., Ye, Z., Lozano, L. E. C., Munch, M. W., Perner, A., Du, B., Mbuagbaw, L., Alhazzani, W., Pastores, S. M., Marshall, J., Lamontagne, F., Annane, D., Meduri, G. U., & Rochwerg, B. (2021). Corticosteroids in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06394-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.