Optical sensor systems for bioprocess monitoring
Abstract
Bioreactors are closed systems in which microorganisms can be cultivated under defined, controllable conditions that can be optimized with regard to viability, reproducibility, and product-oriented productivity. To drive the biochemical reaction network of the biological system through the desired reaction optimally, the complex interactions of the overall system must be understood and controlled. Optical sensors which encompass all analytical methods based on interactions of light with matter are efficient tools to obtain this information. Optical sensors generally offer the advantages of noninvasive, nondestructive, continuous, and simultaneous multianalyte monitoring. However, at this time, no general optical detection system has been developed. Since modern bioprocesses are extremely complex and differ from process to process (e.g., fungal antibiotic production versus mammalian cell cultivation), appropriate analytical systems must be set up from different basic modules, designed to meet the special demands of each particular process. In this minireview, some new applications in bioprocess monitoring of the following optical sensing principles will be discussed: UV spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, pulsed terahertz spectroscopy (PTS), optical biosensors, in situ microscope, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIF).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fluorescence spectroscopy is flexible for monitoring a number of analytes via direct or indirect correlations.
“The flexibility of fluorescence spectroscopy is well‐reported for the monitoring of a number of analytes, via direct or indirect correlations, such as proteins, vitamins, co‐enzymes, glucose, ethanol, ATP, pyruvate, nitrate, or succinate (Shaw et al., 1999; Ulber et al., 2003; Hantelmann et al., 2006; Glindkamp et al., 2009; Ranzan et al., 2012).”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Ulber et al., 2003
NIR low absorption coefficients enable a higher penetration depth, allowing the use of NIR in solids or turbid liquids such as culture broths.
“The low absorption coefficients enable a higher penetration depth, allowing the use of this technique in solids or turbid liquids, such as culture broths (Marose et al., 1999; Ulber et al., 2003; Glindkamp et al., 2009; Henriques et al., 2010).”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Ulber et al., 2003
Spectroscopic sensors do not interfere with biological material, allowing monitoring of in vivo cells and obtaining information on their intracellular state, in addition to information on extracellular media.
“Also, as non‐invasive techniques, spectroscopic sensors do not interfere with the biological material, allowing to monitor in vivo cells and obtain information on their intracellular state, in addition to information on extracellular media (Marose et al., 1999; Ulber et al., 2003; Hantelmann et al., 2006; Glindkamp et al., 2009).”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Ulber et al., 2003
The main difficulties for the restricted application of optical sensors are interferences that influence the quality of fluorescence spectra, such as turbidity, gas bubbles, and fouling.
“The main difficulties described for the restricted application of this technology to date are mostly due to interferences that influence the quality of the fluorescence spectra, such as turbidity, gas bubbles, and fouling (Tartakovsky et al., 1996; Marose et al., 1999; Ulber et al., 2003).”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Ulber et al., 2003
Raman spectroscopy cannot be used with strongly fluorescent samples.
“Nevertheless, the intensity of the signal acquired is very weak and difficult to separate from the scattering, and it cannot be used with strongly fluorescent samples (Ulber et al., 2003; Singh et al., 2019).”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Ulber et al., 2003
UV/Vis has two major drawbacks: lack of specificity and can only be used in liquid and homogenous samples.
“This technique has two major drawbacks: the lack of specificity and can only be used in liquid and homogenous samples (Ulber et al., 2003; Claßen et al., 2017).”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Ulber et al., 2003
Parameters measured online are usually less than the required parameters needed for accurate monitoring and control.
“Also, the parameters measured online are usually less than the required parameters needed for accurate monitoring and control (Ulber et al., 2003; Glindkamp et al., 2009).”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Ulber et al., 2003
Spectroscopic optical sensors are non-invasive, non-destructive, and allow the detection of several molecules simultaneously.
“These sensors are non‐invasive, non‐destructive, and allow the detection of several molecules simultaneously.”
From Perspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry (2022) · cites this paper as Ulber et al., 2003
Cites
Two-Dimensional Fluorescence Spectroscopy: A New Tool for On-Line Bioprocess Monitoring
Marose, S., Lindemann, C., & Scheper, T. (1998) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp970124o · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Shaw, A. D., Kaderbhai, N., Jones, A., Woodward, A. M., Goodacre, R., Rowland, J. J., & Kell, D. B. (1999) · Applied Spectroscopy · doi:10.1366/0003702991945777 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Abu‐Absi, N. R., Kenty, B. M., Cuellar, M. E., Borys, M. C., Sakhamuri, S., Strachan, D. J., Hausladen, M. C., & Li, Z. J. (2011) · Biotechnology and Bioengineering · doi:10.1002/bit.23023 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Sensor systems for bioprocess monitoring
Biechele, P., Busse, C., Solle, D., Scheper, T., & Reardon, K. (2015) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201500014 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Modern Sensor Tools and Techniques for Monitoring, Controlling, and Improving Cell Culture Processes
Reyes, S. J., Durocher, Y., Pham, P. L., & Henry, O. (2022) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr10020189 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Bhatia, H., Mehdizadeh, H., Drapeau, D., & Yoon, S. (2018) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201700084 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
On-line soft sensing in upstream bioprocessing
Randek, J., & Mandenius, C.-F. (2018) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/07388551.2017.1312271 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Guez, J. S., Cassar, J. P., Wartelle, F., Dhulster, P., & Suhr, H. (2004) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.04.028 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Liu, Y.-J., André, S., Saint Cristau, L., Lagresle, S., Hannas, Z., Calvosa, É., Devos, O., & Duponchel, L. (2017) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2016.11.064 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Sensors and Techniques for On-Line Determination of Cell Viability in Bioprocess Monitoring
Rösner, L., Walter, F., Ude, C., John, G., & Beutel, S. (2022) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering9120762 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationPerspectives of fluorescence spectroscopy for online monitoring in microalgae industry
Sá, M., Ferrer‐Ledo, N., Gao, F., Bertinetto, C. G., Jansen, J., Crespo, J. G., Wijffels, R. H., Barbosa, M., & Galinha, C. F. (2022) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.14013 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ulber, R., Frerichs, J.-G., & Beutel, S.
- Affiliations
- Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ulber, Roland
- Venue
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 376
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 342-348
- ISSN
- 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1591819404
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
- Keywords
- optical sensors, bioprocess monitoring, bioreactors, ultraviolet spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, optical biosensors, in situ microscopy, surface plasmon resonance, reflectometric interference spectroscopy, non-invasive monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Spectrum Analysis, Biosensing Techniques, Biomass, Bioreactors, Optics and Photonics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review