Cited by 151Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchWater Quality Monitoring and AnalysisSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses

Optical sensor systems for bioprocess monitoring

Ulber, Roland, Frerichs, Jan-Gerd, Beutel, Sascha·2003·Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Abstract

Bioreactors are closed systems in which microorganisms can be cultivated under defined, controllable conditions that can be optimized with regard to viability, reproducibility, and product-oriented productivity. To drive the biochemical reaction network of the biological system through the desired reaction optimally, the complex interactions of the overall system must be understood and controlled. Optical sensors which encompass all analytical methods based on interactions of light with matter are efficient tools to obtain this information. Optical sensors generally offer the advantages of noninvasive, nondestructive, continuous, and simultaneous multianalyte monitoring. However, at this time, no general optical detection system has been developed. Since modern bioprocesses are extremely complex and differ from process to process (e.g., fungal antibiotic production versus mammalian cell cultivation), appropriate analytical systems must be set up from different basic modules, designed to meet the special demands of each particular process. In this minireview, some new applications in bioprocess monitoring of the following optical sensing principles will be discussed: UV spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, pulsed terahertz spectroscopy (PTS), optical biosensors, in situ microscope, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), and reflectometric interference spectroscopy (RIF).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00216-003-1930-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fluorescence spectroscopy is flexible for monitoring a number of analytes via direct or indirect correlations.

    “The flexibility of fluorescence spectroscopy is well‐reported for the monitoring of a number of analytes, via direct or indirect correlations, such as proteins, vitamins, co‐enzymes, glucose, ethanol, ATP, pyruvate, nitrate, or succinate (Shaw et al., 1999; Ulber et al., 2003; Hantelmann et al., 2006; Glindkamp et al., 2009; Ranzan et al., 2012).”
  • NIR low absorption coefficients enable a higher penetration depth, allowing the use of NIR in solids or turbid liquids such as culture broths.

    “The low absorption coefficients enable a higher penetration depth, allowing the use of this technique in solids or turbid liquids, such as culture broths (Marose et al., 1999; Ulber et al., 2003; Glindkamp et al., 2009; Henriques et al., 2010).”
  • Spectroscopic sensors do not interfere with biological material, allowing monitoring of in vivo cells and obtaining information on their intracellular state, in addition to information on extracellular media.

    “Also, as non‐invasive techniques, spectroscopic sensors do not interfere with the biological material, allowing to monitor in vivo cells and obtain information on their intracellular state, in addition to information on extracellular media (Marose et al., 1999; Ulber et al., 2003; Hantelmann et al., 2006; Glindkamp et al., 2009).”
  • The main difficulties for the restricted application of optical sensors are interferences that influence the quality of fluorescence spectra, such as turbidity, gas bubbles, and fouling.

    “The main difficulties described for the restricted application of this technology to date are mostly due to interferences that influence the quality of the fluorescence spectra, such as turbidity, gas bubbles, and fouling (Tartakovsky et al., 1996; Marose et al., 1999; Ulber et al., 2003).”
  • Raman spectroscopy cannot be used with strongly fluorescent samples.

    “Nevertheless, the intensity of the signal acquired is very weak and difficult to separate from the scattering, and it cannot be used with strongly fluorescent samples (Ulber et al., 2003; Singh et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ulber, R., Frerichs, J.-G., & Beutel, S.
Affiliations
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Ulber, Roland
Venue
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Published
2003-05-01
Volume
376
Issue
3
Pages
342-348
ISSN
1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1591819404
Cited by
151
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Keywords
optical sensors, bioprocess monitoring, bioreactors, ultraviolet spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, optical biosensors, in situ microscopy, surface plasmon resonance, reflectometric interference spectroscopy, non-invasive monitoring
MeSH terms
Spectrum Analysis, Biosensing Techniques, Biomass, Bioreactors, Optics and Photonics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review