The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent developments in solid-phase microextraction
Open accessAbstract
The main objective of this review is to describe the recent developments in solid-phase microextraction technology in food, environmental and bioanalytical chemistry applications. We briefly introduce the historical perspective on the very early work associated with the development of theoretical principles of SPME, but particular emphasis is placed on the more recent developments in the area of automation, high-throughput analysis, SPME method optimization approaches and construction of new SPME devices and their applications. The area of SPME automation for both GC and LC applications is particularly addressed in this review, as the most recent developments in this field have allowed the use of this technology for high-throughput applications. The development of new autosamplers with SPME compatibility and new-generation metal fibre assemblies has enhanced sample throughput for SPME-GC applications, the latter being attributed to the possibility of using the same fibre for several hundred extraction/injection cycles. For LC applications, high-throughput analysis (>1,000 samples per day) can be achieved for the first time with a multi-SPME autosampler which uses multi-well plate technology and allows SPME sample preparation of up to 96 samples in parallel. The development and evolution of new SPME devices such as needle trap, thin-film microextraction and cold-fibre headspace SPME have offered significant improvements in performance characteristics compared with the conventional fibre-SPME arrangement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prosen, H., & Zupančič-Kralj, L. (1999) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0165-9936(98)00109-5 · Cited by 565
Cited by
Nondestructive Sampling of Living Systems Using in Vivo Solid-Phase Microextraction
Ouyang, G., Vuckovic, D., & Pawliszyn, J. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100203t · Cited by 426
Self-citationThe role of green extraction techniques in Green Analytical Chemistry
Armenta, S., Garrigues, S., & de la Guardia, M. (2015) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2014.12.011 · Cited by 329
Breath Analysis as a Potential and Non-Invasive Frontier in Disease Diagnosis: An Overview
Pereira, J., Porto-Figueira, P., Cavaco, C., Taunk, K., Rapole, S., Dhakne, R., Nagarajaram, H., & Câmara, J. (2015) · Metabolites · doi:10.3390/metabo5010003 · Cited by 301
Souza-Silva, É. A., Gionfriddo, E., & Pawliszyn, J. (2015) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2015.04.018 · Cited by 290
Self-citationYao, C., & Anderson, J. L. (2009) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-009-3078-0 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Risticevic, S., Niri, V. H., Vuckovic, D., & Pawliszyn, J.
- Venue
- Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
- Published
- 2008-10-04
- Volume
- 393
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 781-795
- ISSN
- 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
- 1618-2650
- OpenAlex
- W1990889920
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recent developments in solid-phase microextraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00216-008-2375-3
- The paper
- Risticevic, S., Niri, V. H., Vuckovic, D., & Pawliszyn, J. (2009). Recent developments in solid-phase microextraction. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2375-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.