Cited by 83Mass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsRNA modifications and cancer

Label-free analysis of mRNA capping efficiency using RNase H probes and LC-MS

Beverly, Michael, Dell, Amy, Parmar, Parul, Houghton, Leslie·2016·Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

Abstract

A label-free method for determining the 5'-end cap identity and orientation of a messenger RNA (mRNA) is described. Biotin-tagged probes that were complementary to the 5' end of target mRNA were used with RNase H to cleave the 5' end of the mRNA. The cleaved end sequence was isolated using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads and then analyzed by LC-MS. Quantitative and qualitative information on the 5' cap was determined from the unique mass of the isolated cleaved sequence. This approach, combined with the use of 5' RNA pyrophosphohydrolase, was also used to ascertain the orientation of the 5' cap. The assay showed low-picomole sensitivity for detecting capping reaction impurities. Uncapped triphosphate mRNA, spiked into 100 pmol of capped mRNA, could be detected over the tested range of 0.5 to 25 % with a linear response. The capping efficiency of several vaccinia-capped mRNA preparations was determined to be between 88 and 98 % depending on the modification type and length of the mRNA. mRNA of 2.2K and 9K nucleotides in length and containing the modified nucleotides pseudouridine and 5-methylcytidine were all successfully analyzed, demonstrating the utility of the technique to study mRNA capping. Graphical abstract mRNA 5' end analysis with RNAse H cleavage and capture probe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00216-016-9605-x

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Determining mRNA capping efficiency is critical for quality control of mRNA vaccines, which is usually determined by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

    “As a result, determining mRNA capping efficiency is critical for quality control of mRNA vaccines, which is usually determined by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS).467”

    From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [467]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beverly, M., Dell, A., Parmar, P., & Houghton, L.
Corresponding author
Beverly, Michael
Venue
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Published
2016-05-18
Volume
408
Issue
18
Pages
5021-5030
ISSN
  • 1618-2642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1618-2650
OpenAlex
W2395331380
Cited by
83
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR-0011-13-3-0003.)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA modifications and cancer
Keywords
RNase H cleavage, label-free detection, streptavidin-coated magnetic beads, pseudouridine, 5-methylcytidine
MeSH terms
Chromatography, Liquid, RNA Caps, RNA, Messenger, Sensitivity and Specificity, Mass Spectrometry, Staining and Labeling, Reproducibility of Results, Molecular Probes, Molecular Probe Techniques, Ribonuclease H, Sequence Analysis, RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review