Sequence-engineered mRNA without chemical nucleoside modifications enables an effective protein therapy in large animals
Open accessAbstract
Being a transient carrier of genetic information, mRNA could be a versatile, flexible, and safe means for protein therapies. While recent findings highlight the enormous therapeutic potential of mRNA, evidence that mRNA-based protein therapies are feasible beyond small animals such as mice is still lacking. Previous studies imply that mRNA therapeutics require chemical nucleoside modifications to obtain sufficient protein expression and avoid activation of the innate immune system. Here we show that chemically unmodified mRNA can achieve those goals as well by applying sequence-engineered molecules. Using erythropoietin (EPO) driven production of red blood cells as the biological model, engineered Epo mRNA elicited meaningful physiological responses from mice to nonhuman primates. Even in pigs of about 20 kg in weight, a single adequate dose of engineered mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) induced high systemic Epo levels and strong physiological effects. Our results demonstrate that sequence-engineered mRNA has the potential to revolutionize human protein therapies.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Sequence-engineered, chemically unmodified mRNA encoding erythropoietin produced high protein expression and physiological responses in mice, pigs (~20 kg), and cynomolgus monkeys without requiring nucleoside modifications. The work provides proof of feasibility for unmodified mRNA protein therapy in large animals, though clinical proof remains pending.
Key findings
- In vitro, sequence-engineered unmodified luciferase and EPO mRNAs gave higher protein expression than their nucleoside-modified counterparts; with a less advanced luciferase mRNA, pseudouridine incorporation showed the previously described superiority (P < 0.0001 for all doses, Student’s t-test).
- In BALB/c mice, intraperitoneal TransIT-complexed sequence-engineered mEpo mRNA produced higher EPO levels than its pseudouridine-modified counterpart (P < 0.0005 at all times), and doses down to 10 ng unmodified mRNA significantly increased reticulocytes (P < 0.05 versus untreated).
- Repeated treatment with unmodified mRNA did not elicit substantial TNF-α, IL-6, or IFN-γ release; all measurements lay within the range observed for formulation reagent only, and no anti-EPO antibodies were detected (assay detection limit < 0.1 ng/ml).
- In large animals, a single intravenous dose of LNP-encapsulated unmodified engineered mRNA produced high serum EPO and strong physiological effects: pigs (~20 kg) received 0.065 mg/kg and showed sustained hematocrit elevation (P < 0.05 for day 12 versus pretreatment); cynomolgus monkeys received 0.037 mg/kg and showed increased EPO, reticulocytes, and hematocrit (P < 0.05 for 96 hours versus pretreatment) with no detectable cytokine release.
Methods
- Sequence engineering adapted codons to the most GC-rich codons for each amino acid and used optimized regulatory elements: a 5′-UTR from HSD17B4, a 3′-UTR from ALB, a polyA, and a histone stem loop; mRNAs were T7-transcribed, capped, and purified by reversed-phase chromatography.
- Formulations: TransIT-mRNA for intraperitoneal administration in mice and pigs; LNPs from Acuitas for intravenous administration in pigs and macaques (ionizable cationic lipid/phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol/PEG-lipid at 50:10:38.5:1.5 mol/mol, RNA-to-total lipid ratio ~0.05 wt/wt, diameter ~80 nm).
- Animal experiments: female BALB/c mice 7–9 weeks old; cynomolgus monkeys 2.5–2.8 kg given a single 100 μg LNP-formulated EPO mRNA dose; Hungarian large white domestic pigs (~20 kg) given either 360 μg TransIT-formulated porcine EPO mRNA intraperitoneally on two consecutive days or 1.3 mg LNP-formulated porcine Epo mRNA intravenously. Analyses included EPO ELISA, reticulocyte counts, hematocrit, cytokine bead array, anti-EPO ELISA, and spleen histology.
Limitations
- The paper does not include a formal limitations section; it states that the approach “currently awaits its first clinical proof of principle” and that formulations differ and “have probably to be selected on a case-by-case basis.”
- Evident from the text: no human data are reported, and large-animal immunogenicity/safety assessment is limited—cytokine release was examined in monkeys, but anti-EPO antibody testing was performed only in mice.
- Evident from the text: the therapeutic model is restricted to erythropoietin, and large-animal experiments used single or short dosing regimens rather than long-term repeated administration.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
21 of 48 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 2 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationown data
Sequence-engineered, unmodified mRNA is competitive with nucleoside-modified mRNA with respect to protein yield in vivo.
“In summary, these data demonstrate that sequence-engineered, unmodified mRNA is competitive with nucleoside-modified mRNA with respect to protein yield in vivo.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
“Using a common model protein, erythropoietin, as well as a formulation reagent and an administration route that were previously applied to state-of-the-art pseudouridine mRNA, our data suggest that sequence-engineered mRNA is competitive with modified mRNA with respect to protein yield and physiological efficacy.27”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Karikó, 2012, Increased erythropoiesis in mice injected with submicrogram quantities of pseudouridine-containing mRNA encoding erythropoietin, Mol Ther source
The Results (page not provided) compare codon-optimized EPO mRNAs differing in whether they contain uridine or pseudouridine. In mice, the unmodified mRNA produced much lower EPO levels; 0.001 µg of pseudouridine-containing mRNA was as potent as 1 µg of unmodified mRNA in raising reticulocyte counts. This is contrary to the claimed comparable in-vivo yield. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § Discussion · hedged
- Premisecitation
Two independent studies found superiority of nucleoside-modified compared to unmodified Epo mRNA.
“Two independent studies on erythropoietin-encoding mRNA found a superiority of nucleoside-modified compared to unmodified mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [26] Kormann, 2011, Expression of therapeutic proteins after delivery of chemically modified mRNA in mice, Nat Biotechnol source
- cites [27] Karikó, 2012, Increased erythropoiesis in mice injected with submicrogram quantities of pseudouridine-containing mRNA encoding erythropoietin, Mol Ther source
The Results (page unavailable) show that pseudouridine-modified EPO mRNA produced higher, longer-lasting EPO levels than uridine-containing EPO mRNA in mice. The Introduction mentions another study of modified mRNA for therapeutic proteins, but does not establish that it independently compared modified and unmodified EPO mRNA. This source therefore supports the superiority finding for one study, not the claim about two independent EPO studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
The physiological effect of administering engineered Epo mRNA is as strong as that observed with pseudouridine-modified mRNA.
“Taking into account the lower reticulocyte numbers obtained with 100 U of recombinant EPO protein as well as the lower background levels compared to a recent publication,27 the physiological effect of administering our engineered Epo mRNA is as strong as that observed with pseudouridine-modified mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Karikó, 2012, Increased erythropoiesis in mice injected with submicrogram quantities of pseudouridine-containing mRNA encoding erythropoietin, Mol Ther source
- Rests on an assumption: Administration of erythropoietin causes a burst release of reticulocytes into the blood stream.
- Interpretationreasoning
The lack of biological efficacy of HPLC-purified basic Epo mRNA highlights the importance and potency of sequence-engineering.
“Although high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) purification depletes contaminants and, thus, contributes to reduced immunostimulation as well as improves mRNA expression to some extent,36,37,38 the lack of biological efficacy of HPLC-purified basic Epo mRNA highlights the importance and potency of sequence-engineering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [36] Pascolo, 2004, Messenger RNA-based vaccines, Expert Opin Biol Ther source
- cites [37] Probst, 2007, Spontaneous cellular uptake of exogenous messenger RNA in vivo is nucleic acid-specific, saturable and ion dependent, Gene Ther source
- cites [38] Karikó, 2011, Generating the optimal mRNA for therapy: HPLC purification eliminates immune activation and improves translation of nucleoside-modified, protein-encoding mRNA, Nucleic Acids Res source
- Premisecitation
Nucleoside modifications are well known to limit or even inhibit RNA sensor engagement.
“In addition, nucleoside modifications are well known to limit or even inhibit RNA sensor engagement.20,21,22”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Karikó, 2005, Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA, Immunity source
- cites [21] Anderson, 2011, Nucleoside modifications in RNA limit activation of 2’-5’-oligoadenylate synthetase and increase resistance to cleavage by RNase L, Nucleic Acids Res source
- cites [22] Anderson, 2010, Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA enhances translation by diminishing PKR activation, Nucleic Acids Res source
- Findingown data
Administration of mEpo-encoding mRNA elicited an increase of reticulocyte numbers in mice.
“Accordingly, the administration of mEpo-encoding mRNA elicited an increase of reticulocyte numbers in mice (Figure 3a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Similar lack of cytokine release was obtained after six administrations within 3 weeks.
“Similar results were obtained after six administrations within 3 weeks, i.e., after a more challenging treatment regime (Figure 4b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cytokine release from unmodified mRNA may cause unwanted or detrimental side effects, including a possibly fatal immune response against the encoded protein.
- Findingown data
Introducing nucleoside modifications was always detrimental to protein expression when applied to sequence-engineered mRNA.
“In contrast to findings by other groups, introducing nucleoside modifications was always detrimental to protein expression when applied to sequence-engineered mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Substantial EPO levels can be obtained with submicrogram quantities of sequence-engineered mRNA in mice.
“A dose-titration revealed that substantial EPO levels could be obtained even with submicrogram quantities of mRNA (Figure 2b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No anti-EPO antibodies were detected after six injections of 0.05 or 0.5 mg/kg mRNA, using an assay with a detection limit of less than 0.1 ng/ml.
“However, no anti-EPO antibodies could be detected using an assay with a detection limit of less than 0.1 ng/ml (Figure 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: A potential antibody response should be fully developed 4 weeks after the last treatment.
- Findingown data
Reticulocyte responses to sequential injections declined over time for both unmodified and modified mRNA but not with recombinant protein.
“In contrast to constant EPO responses, reticulocyte responses to sequential injections declined to some extent over time (Figure 5b). This effect was observed for both unmodified and modified mRNA but not with recombinant protein which, however, did not induce strong biological effects and was probably not delivered to the spleen due to the lack of a TransIT formulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Repeated transfections with mRNA do not require chemical modifications.
“These analyses revealed that repeated transfections with mRNA do not require chemical modifications (Supplementary Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A single intravenous dose of sequence-engineered, unmodified mRNA (0.065 mg/kg) encapsulated in LNPs resulted in very high serum EPO levels in pigs.
“A single intravenous dose of sequence-engineered, unmodified mRNA (0.065 mg/kg) encapsulated in LNPs resulted in very high serum EPO levels (Figure 6a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The effective dose of systemically acting proteins is a function of animal size.
- Findingown data
Temporary pausing of treatment led to a recovery of the reticulocyte response.
“Whereas reticulocyte responses became more severely attenuated with more frequent administrations, temporary pausing of treatment led to a recovery of the reticulocyte response (Supplementary Figure S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Engineered Epo mRNA elicited meaningful physiological responses from mice to nonhuman primates.
“Using erythropoietin (EPO) driven production of red blood cells as the biological model, engineered Epo mRNA elicited meaningful physiological responses from mice to nonhuman primates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The beneficial properties of sequence-engineered mRNA rely on optimizations of the open reading frame and regulatory sequences.
“As in vitro, the beneficial properties rely on optimizations of the open reading frame and regulatory sequences (Supplementary Figure S2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No differences could be observed between sequence-engineered, unmodified mRNA and its pseudouridine-modified counterpart concerning reticulocyte attenuation.
“Concerning this matter, no differences could be observed between sequence-engineered, unmodified mRNA and its pseudouridine-modified counterpart.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
During repeated treatment, doses did not lose efficacy with respect to serum EPO levels obtained 24 hours after administration.
“During the treatment period, doses did not lose efficacy with respect to serum EPO levels obtained 24 hours after administration (Figure 5a) (P = 0.235 for 1 μg mRNA, analysis of variance).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: EPO protein has a very short half-life in serum and mRNA is transient, so measurements reflect EPO expression in response to the latest treatment only.
- Findingown data
In vivo, intraperitoneal TransIT-complexed sequence-engineered mEpo mRNA in BALB/c mice confirmed reduced protein yield from nucleoside-modified mRNA.
“Intraperitoneal administration of TransIT-complexed sequence-engineered mEpo mRNA, either unmodified or harboring pseudouridine instead of uridine, into BALB/c mice confirmed our general in vitro observation of a reduced protein yield from nucleoside-modified mRNA (Figure 2a) (P < 0.0005 at all times, Student's t-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: In vitro expression data may not faithfully predict in vivo features.
- Findingown data
Sequence-engineered mRNA outperformed its pseudouridine-modified counterpart in reticulocyte response.
“As suggested by protein levels, the sequence-engineered mRNA outperformed its pseudouridine-modified counterpart (P < 0.01, Student's t-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In pigs of about 20 kg, a single adequate dose of engineered mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles induced high systemic Epo levels and strong physiological effects.
“Even in pigs of about 20 kg in weight, a single adequate dose of engineered mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) induced high systemic Epo levels and strong physiological effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All doses down to 10 ng of unmodified mRNA significantly increased reticulocyte numbers in mice.
“All doses down to 10 ng of unmodified mRNA significantly increased reticulocyte numbers (Figure 3b) (P < 0.05 for 10 ng versus untreated, Student's t-test).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The effects of continued treatment of mice did not differ qualitatively between sequence-engineered Epo mRNA and its pseudouridine-modified counterpart.
“Accordingly, the effects of a continued treatment of mice did not differ qualitatively between a sequence-engineered Epo mRNA and its pseudouridine-modified counterpart.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The values obtained in nonhuman primates following intravenous administration of a reasonable dose of mRNA encapsulated in LNPs designed for hepatic delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics are very much in line with the clinical EPO values.
“These values are very much in line with those we obtained in nonhuman primates following intravenous administration of a reasonable dose of mRNA encapsulated in LNPs designed for hepatic delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics.41”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] Hope, 2014, Enhancing siRNA delivery by employing lipid nanoparticles, Therapeutic Delivery source
- Findingown data
mRNA sequence-engineering improves protein expression in vitro.
“Figure S1. mRNA sequence-engineering improves protein expression in vitro.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Incorporation of pseudouridine shows negative interference with functional RNA elements.
“Figure S7. Incorporation of pseudouridine shows negative interference with functional RNA elements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Incorporation of modified nucleosides such as pseudouridine impairs the function of internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements.
“In line with this, we found that the incorporation of modified nucleosides such as pseudouridine impairs the function of internal ribosome entry site (IRES) elements (Supplementary Figure S7b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Repeated transfections of primary cells with mRNA do not require chemical modifications.
“Figure S3. Repeated transfections of primary cells with mRNA do not require chemical modifications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TransIT-complexed engineered Epo mRNA can elicit systemic physiological responses in swine.
“Figure S8. TransIT-complexed engineered Epo mRNA can elicit systemic physiological responses in swine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Even a weight-adjusted dose of TransIT-complexed porcine Epo mRNA elicited a statistically significant and meaningful physiological response in pigs with a body weight of about 20 kg.
“Nevertheless, even a weight-adjusted dose of TransIT-complexed porcine Epo mRNA elicited a statistically significant and meaningful physiological response in pigs with a body weight of about 20 kg (Supplementary Figure S8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
mRNA sequence-engineering improves protein expression in vivo.
“Figure S2. mRNA sequence-engineering improves protein expression in vivo.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Desensitization by high and/or frequent EPO expression transiently reduces the physiological response to the hormone.
“Figure S5. Desensitization by high and/or frequent EPO expression transiently reduces the physiological response to the hormone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
LNP-encapsulated engineered, unmodified Epo mRNA does not show inappropriate stimulation of the innate immune system.
“Figure S6. LNP-encapsulated engineered, unmodified Epo mRNA does not show inappropriate stimulation of the innate immune system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Simple body weight adjustments of the dose (similar doses per kg) were sufficient to gain substantial physiological effects in small to large animals.
“Simple body weight adjustments of the dose, i.e., similar doses per kg, were sufficient to gain substantial physiological effects in small to large animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Regarding erythropoietin expression in pigs, the intravenously administered LNP-formulation of engineered mRNA appeared to be more effective than intraperitoneally injected TransIT-complexes.
“Regarding erythropoietin expression in pigs, the intravenously administered LNP-formulation of engineered mRNA appeared to be more effective than intraperitoneally injected TransIT-complexes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Cytokine secretion by RNA-transfected cells strongly correlated with the extent of nucleoside modifications.
“Obviously, cytokine secretion by RNA-transfected cells strongly correlated with the extent of nucleoside modifications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] Karikó, 2005, Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA, Immunity source
- Interpretationown data
The attenuation of the reticulocyte response appears to be due to physiological control mechanisms or limitations of erythropoiesis upon excessive EPO availability rather than side effects of the mRNA-based protein therapy.
“In summary, the attenuation of the reticulocyte response appears to be due to physiological control mechanisms or limitations of erythropoiesis upon excessive EPO availability rather than side effects of the mRNA-based protein therapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Administration of erythropoietin causes a burst release of reticulocytes into the blood stream.
- Interpretationown data
Sequence-engineered mRNA has the potential to revolutionize human protein therapies.
“Our results demonstrate that sequence-engineered mRNA has the potential to revolutionize human protein therapies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Several RNA structural features are immunostimulatory due to interactions with RNA sensors such as Toll-like receptors, RIG-I, and PKR.
“However, several RNA structural features have been described as immunostimulatory due to interactions with various RNA sensors such as Toll-like receptors, RIG-I, and PKR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 8 sources checked- cites [7] Alexopoulou, 2001, Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3, Nature source
- cites [8] Diebold, 2004, Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA, Science source
- cites [9] Heil, 2004, Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8, Science source
- cites [10] Hornung, 2006, 5’-Triphosphate RNA is the ligand for RIG-I, Science source
- cites [11] Kato, 2006, Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses, Nature source
- cites [12] Pichlmair, 2006, RIG-I-mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5’-phosphates, Science source
- cites [13] Rehwinkel, 2010, RIG-I detects viral genomic RNA during negative-strand RNA virus infection, Cell source
- cites [14] Nallagatla, 2007, 5’-triphosphate-dependent activation of PKR by RNAs with short stem-loops, Science source
- Interpretationreasoning
The strong elevation of hematocrit with engineered Epo mRNA is comparable with data from the pseudouridine-modified mRNA study.
“Likewise, the strong elevation of the hematocrit, the volume percentage of red blood cells in blood, is comparable with data from that study while effect sizes are largely corresponding to protein and reticulocyte levels (Figure 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Administration of erythropoietin causes a burst release of reticulocytes into the blood stream.
- Interpretationown data
This advance was accomplished employing sequence-optimized, unmodified mRNA.
“This advance was accomplished employing sequence-optimized, unmodified mRNA.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The present study demonstrates for the first time that mRNA can give rise to therapeutically relevant protein levels in large animals.
“For the first time, the present study demonstrates that mRNA can give rise to therapeutically relevant protein levels in large animals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: It has yet to be shown that meaningful expression levels can be obtained in animals close to humans in weight with a feasible mRNA dose.
- Interpretationown data
The present data suggest that an effective unmodified mRNA is not dependent on a specific formulation.
“The present data suggest that an effective unmodified mRNA is not dependent on a specific formulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In healthy volunteers and anemic patients with chronic kidney disease, a dose of recombinant erythropoietin of about 600 IU/kg led to an increase of the percentage of reticulocytes of about 2.
“In healthy volunteers as well as anemic patients with chronic kidney disease, a dose of recombinant erythropoietin of about 600 IU/kg (which appears to be among the highest usually applied in clinical settings) led to maximum serum EPO levels of about 1,000 mIU/ml and an increase of the percentage of reticulocytes of about 2.39,40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] Cheung, 1998, Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human erythropoietin after single and multiple subcutaneous doses to healthy subjects, Clin Pharmacol Ther source
- cites [40] McGowan, 2008, Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of extended dosing of epoetin alfa in anemic patients who have chronic kidney disease and are not on dialysis, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol source
- Premisecitation
Local administrations may be possible without the need for an mRNA delivery system.
“While local administrations may be possible without the need for an mRNA delivery system,26,42”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
In healthy volunteers and anemic patients with chronic kidney disease, a dose of recombinant erythropoietin of about 600 IU/kg led to maximum serum EPO levels of about 1,000 mIU/ml.
“In healthy volunteers as well as anemic patients with chronic kidney disease, a dose of recombinant erythropoietin of about 600 IU/kg (which appears to be among the highest usually applied in clinical settings) led to maximum serum EPO levels of about 1,000 mIU/ml and an increase of the percentage of reticulocytes of about 2.39,40”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] Cheung, 1998, Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human erythropoietin after single and multiple subcutaneous doses to healthy subjects, Clin Pharmacol Ther source
- cites [40] McGowan, 2008, Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of extended dosing of epoetin alfa in anemic patients who have chronic kidney disease and are not on dialysis, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol source
- Interpretationown data
There is now profound evidence that mRNA, not least sequence-engineered but otherwise unmodified mRNA, can revolutionize protein therapy.
“Collectively, there is now profound evidence that mRNA, not least sequence-engineered but otherwise unmodified mRNA, can revolutionize protein therapy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
mRNAs harboring chemically modified nucleosides may be subject to much stronger limitations of maximum translation efficacy than solutions solely based on sequence-engineering due to reduced activity or inactivity of regulatory sequences in the presence of modifications.
“Collectively, this may imply that mRNAs harboring chemically modified nucleosides may be subject to much stronger limitations of maximum translation efficacy than solutions solely based on sequence-engineering due to a reduced activity or even inactivity of regulatory sequences in the presence of modifications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Protein therapies based on sequence-engineered mRNA are characterized by a very good transferability between species.
“As demonstrated, protein therapies based on sequence-engineered mRNA are characterized by a very good transferability between species.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Modifications lead to a general weakening of protein-mRNA interactions.
“Combining these observations, it seems reasonable that modifications lead to a general weakening of protein-mRNA interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The present study provides the first evidence that mRNA treatments can achieve meaningful biological effects in primates.
“Thus, the present study provides the first evidence that mRNA treatments can achieve meaningful biological effects in primates”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
- May combine two claims. 19
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLNPs used in this study are similar in composition to those described previously, which contain an ionizable cationic lipid/phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol/PEG-lipid (50:10:38.5:1.5 mol/mol), encapsulated RNA-to-total lipid ratio of ~0.05 (wt/wt) and a diameter of ~80 nm.
“LNPs used in this study are similar in composition to those described previously, which contain an ionizable cationic lipid/phosphatidylcholine/cholesterol/PEG-lipid (50:10:38.5:1.5 mol/mol), encapsulated RNA-to-total lipid ratio of ~0.05 (wt/wt) and a diameter of ~80 nm.28,43”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [28] Jayaraman, 2012, Maximizing the potency of siRNA lipid nanoparticles for hepatic gene silencing in vivo, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl source
The paper describes an optimized LNP formulation with the stated 50/10/38.5/1.5 molar composition. In its formulation description (page not available), it gives an approximately 0.05 siRNA-to-lipid ratio and a 70–90 nm particle-size range, but those measurements are stated for the earlier 40/10/40/10 formulation, not explicitly for the optimized one. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [43] Maier, 2013, Biodegradable lipids enabling rapidly eliminated lipid nanoparticles for systemic delivery of RNAi therapeutics, Mol Ther source
The Materials and Methods describe the same four lipid components but give a molar ratio of 55:10:32.5:2.5 and a total-lipid-to-siRNA weight ratio of ~10:1 (siRNA-to-lipid ~0.1), rather than the claimed 50:10:38.5:1.5 and ~0.05. The in vivo efficacy section reports a mean particle diameter of ~60 nm, not ~80 nm. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPseudouridine-containing mRNAs reduced activation of known RNA sensors substantially.
“Transferring this concept to in vitro transcribed mRNA, for instance, pseudouridine-containing mRNAs reduced activation of known RNA sensors substantially.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] Karikó, 2005, Suppression of RNA recognition by Toll-like receptors: the impact of nucleoside modification and the evolutionary origin of RNA, Immunity source
- cites [21] Anderson, 2011, Nucleoside modifications in RNA limit activation of 2’-5’-oligoadenylate synthetase and increase resistance to cleavage by RNase L, Nucleic Acids Res source
- cites [22] Anderson, 2010, Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA enhances translation by diminishing PKR activation, Nucleic Acids Res source
The Results (‘Conventional in vitro transcribed mRNA activates PKR’) show that pseudouridine-containing mRNA activates the RNA sensor PKR less than unmodified mRNA. The Introduction says pseudouridine-modified RNA can avoid activation of other receptors, including TLRs and RIG-I, but this paper does not establish a substantial reduction across multiple sensors specifically for pseudouridine-containing mRNAs. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPseudouridine-containing mRNAs were still translated and produced even more protein compared to unmodified mRNA.
“Although pseudouridine is primarily found in tRNA, rRNA, and small nuclear RNAs, pseudouridine-containing mRNAs were still translated and produced even more protein compared to unmodified mRNA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] Anderson, 2010, Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA enhances translation by diminishing PKR activation, Nucleic Acids Res source
- cites [23] Karikó, 2008, Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability, Mol Ther source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNucleoside modifications can strongly enhance protein expression and suppress cytokine secretion.
“Using enhanced green fluorescent protein mRNA, Rossi and colleagues confirmed that nucleoside modifications can strongly enhance protein expression and suppress cytokine secretion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] Warren, 2010, Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA, Cell Stem Cell source
In Results, “Development of modified-RNAs for directing cell fate” (page unavailable), the paper reports that nucleoside modifications in GFP-encoding mRNA markedly increased protein expression and dramatically attenuated interferon signaling. It assessed interferon-response gene expression by qRT-PCR, not cytokine secretion, so the secretion claim is not established by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataConventional unmodified mRNAs are inferior to molecules harboring specific nucleoside modifications, but the picture changes dramatically with sophisticated sequence-engineering.
“Our work principally confirms that conventional unmodified mRNAs are inferior to molecules harboring specific nucleoside modifications as suggested by various recent reports,23,24,25,26,27 however, the picture changes dramatically with a sophisticated sequence-engineering.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim4 of 5 sources checked- cites [23] Karikó, 2008, Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability, Mol Ther source
- cites [24] Warren, 2010, Highly efficient reprogramming to pluripotency and directed differentiation of human cells with synthetic modified mRNA, Cell Stem Cell source
- cites [25] Zangi, 2013, Modified mRNA directs the fate of heart progenitor cells and induces vascular regeneration after myocardial infarction, Nat Biotechnol source
- cites [26] Kormann, 2011, Expression of therapeutic proteins after delivery of chemically modified mRNA in mice, Nat Biotechnol source
- cites [27] Karikó, 2012, Increased erythropoiesis in mice injected with submicrogram quantities of pseudouridine-containing mRNA encoding erythropoietin, Mol Ther source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Acuitas mRNA delivery platform has been developed from technology shown previously to enable siRNA-dependent hepatic gene silencing across species in rodents, nonhuman primates and humans.
“The Acuitas mRNA delivery platform has been developed from technology shown previously to enable siRNA-dependent hepatic gene silencing across species in rodents, nonhuman primates and humans.28,43,44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [28] Jayaraman, 2012, Maximizing the potency of siRNA lipid nanoparticles for hepatic gene silencing in vivo, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl source
The study reports siRNA-mediated hepatic gene silencing in mice and cynomolgus monkeys (Figure 7; page not available). Its conclusion mentions a related formulation in a human clinical trial and preliminary LDL-C decreases, but does not demonstrate hepatic gene silencing in humans or identify the Acuitas mRNA platform as derived from this technology. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [43] Maier, 2013, Biodegradable lipids enabling rapidly eliminated lipid nanoparticles for systemic delivery of RNAi therapeutics, Mol Ther source
The 'In vivo efficacy evaluation in mouse FVII model' section reports siRNA-dependent gene silencing in mice and rats, and 'Efficacy and rapid elimination properties translate to higher species' reports about 70% silencing of a hepatic gene in nonhuman primates. The paper does not demonstrate hepatic gene silencing in humans or establish that the Acuitas mRNA platform was developed from this technology; its Introduction mentions human clinical trials without making those links. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [44] Coelho, 2013, Safety and efficacy of RNAi therapy for transthyretin amyloidosis, N Engl J Med source
The Discussion (page not supplied) reports that lipid-nanoparticle siRNA delivery silenced liver-expressed genes in animals, including nonhuman primates, and that this study demonstrated RNAi-mediated gene modulation in human liver. The paper also discusses results across multiple species, but our copy does not establish that the Acuitas mRNA platform was developed from this technology. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAt blood pH, LNPs exhibit a net neutral surface charge but become positively charged in acidified endosomes following ApoE-mediated endocytosis by hepatocytes in vivo, resulting in endosome disruption and release of mRNA into the cytoplasm.
“At blood pH, LNPs exhibit a net neutral surface charge but become positively charged in acidified endosomes following ApoE-mediated endocytosis by hepatocytes in vivo, resulting in endosome disruption and release of mRNA into the cytoplasm.28,41,45”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [28] Jayaraman, 2012, Maximizing the potency of siRNA lipid nanoparticles for hepatic gene silencing in vivo, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl source
The main text around Figure 5 (page not provided) describes minimal LNP charge at blood pH, ApoE-mediated hepatocyte uptake, and positive charge in acidified endosomes promoting membrane disruption. It says siRNA, not mRNA, is released into the cytoplasm; the cited study concerns siRNA delivery. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [41] Hope, 2014, Enhancing siRNA delivery by employing lipid nanoparticles, Therapeutic Delivery source
- cites [45] Akinc, 2010, Targeted delivery of RNAi therapeutics with endogenous and exogenous ligand-based mechanisms, Mol Ther source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataWith a less advanced luciferase mRNA, pseudouridine incorporation showed superiority over unmodified mRNA, albeit at a low expression level.
“Here, incorporation of pseudouridine showed the previously described superiority regarding protein expression compared to the corresponding unmodified mRNA, albeit at a low expression level (Figure 1c) (P < 0.0001 for all doses, student's t-test).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown datamRNA-injected animals had strongly elevated hematocrits and erythropoiesis-induced splenomegaly without other spleen disturbances.
“As opposed to mice receiving murine recombinant EPO protein, mRNA-injected animals were characterized by strongly elevated hematocrits (P < 0.01 for 1 μg versus untreated on all days, Student's t-test) as well as erythropoiesis induced splenomegaly in the absence of any other disturbances of the spleen (Figure 5c and Supplementary Figure S4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSequence-engineered, chemically unmodified mRNA can achieve sufficient protein expression and avoid innate immune activation.
“Here we show that chemically unmodified mRNA can achieve those goals as well by applying sequence-engineered molecules.”
- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
“Here, using sequence-engineered mRNA, we demonstrate that unmodified mRNA is fully suited for use in protein therapies.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Further, strong evidence is provided that such an mRNA does not cause inappropriate immunostimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Introduction · boosted
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataSequence-engineered mRNA gave rise to longer lasting protein expression than pseudouridine-modified mRNA in mice.
“However, our sequence-engineered mRNA gave rise to longer lasting protein expression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNone of the mice showed substantial cytokine release upon mRNA administration; all measurements lay within the range observed for the formulation reagent only.
“None of the mice showed any substantial cytokine release upon mRNA administration; all measurements lay within the range observed for the formulation reagent only (which by itself could have some immunostimulatory potential) (Figure 4a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cytokine release from unmodified mRNA may cause unwanted or detrimental side effects, including a possibly fatal immune response against the encoded protein.
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataA similar result was obtained with a sequence-engineered mRNA coding for erythropoietin: unmodified mRNA gave higher expression than modified mRNA.
“This effect was not specific to luciferase as a similar result was obtained with a sequence-engineered mRNA coding for erythropoietin (Figure 1b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn pigs, reticulocyte numbers were strongly increased and animals showed a substantial and sustained elevation of the hematocrit after LNP-encapsulated mRNA.
“As a consequence, reticulocyte numbers were strongly increased and animals showed a substantial and sustained elevation of the hematocrit (P < 0.05 for day 12 versus pretreatment, Student's t-test) (Figure 6a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Administration of erythropoietin causes a burst release of reticulocytes into the blood stream.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn vitro, sequence-engineered unmodified luciferase mRNA gave very high luciferase activity, while its nucleoside-modified counterparts gave substantially lower protein levels.
“Notably, in vitro protein expression revealed very high luciferase activity with the unmodified mRNA, while its nucleoside-modified counterparts gave rise to substantially lower protein levels (Figure 1a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSequence-engineering effectiveness requires both adaptation of the open reading frame sequence and potent regulatory untranslated regions.
“Finally, comparison to a modified luciferase mRNA from a commercial supplier confirmed the effectiveness of sequence-engineering for which both adaptation of the open reading frame sequence as well as potent regulatory untranslated regions are essential parameters (Supplementary Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn cynomolgus monkeys, a single intravenous dose (0.037 mg/kg) of LNP-encapsulated unmodified Epo mRNA increased serum EPO levels, reticulocyte counts, and hematocrit, with no detectable cytokine release.
“As observed in pigs, nonhuman primates revealed a considerable increase of serum EPO levels and reticulocyte counts as well as a meaningful raise of the hematocrit (increase for each individual from pretreatment to 96 hours after treatment; P < 0.05 for 96 hours versus pretreatment, Student's t-test) while there was no detectable cytokine release upon treatment (Figure 6b and Supplementary Figure”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Administration of erythropoietin causes a burst release of reticulocytes into the blood stream.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataEngineered mRNA neither induced substantial cytokine release nor elicited a protein-specific antibody response.
“Interestingly, as being attributed to nucleoside-modified mRNA, engineered mRNA neither induced substantial cytokine release nor elicited a protein-specific antibody response.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cytokine release from unmodified mRNA may cause unwanted or detrimental side effects, including a possibly fatal immune response against the encoded protein.
- Rests on an assumption: A potential antibody response should be fully developed 4 weeks after the last treatment.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataTransIT-complexed Epo-mRNA induces massive erythropoiesis in the spleen without causing histological or immunological disturbances.
“Figure S4. TransIT-complexed Epo-mRNA induces massive erythropoiesis in the spleen without causing histological or immunological disturbances.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnmodified Epo mRNA was immunostimulatory and failed to induce sufficient protein expression in mice, whereas nucleoside-modified mRNA achieved detectable protein expression and physiological effects.
“Whereas unmodified Epo mRNA was immunostimulatory and failed to induce sufficient protein expression in mice, a few micrograms of nucleoside-modified mRNA were enough to achieve detectable protein expression and physiological effects upon direct administration to murine muscle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Kormann, 2011, Expression of therapeutic proteins after delivery of chemically modified mRNA in mice, Nat Biotechnol source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataChoosing less effective sequences appears to dampen the negative effect of chemical modifications, suggesting an interference between chemical modifications and regulatory RNA elements.
“Interestingly, choosing less effective sequences appears to dampen the negative effect of chemical modifications (Supplementary Figure S7a), suggesting an interference between chemical modifications and regulatory RNA elements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone givenPrevious studies imply that mRNA therapeutics require chemical nucleoside modifications to obtain sufficient protein expression and avoid activation of the innate immune system.
“Previous studies imply that mRNA therapeutics require chemical nucleoside modifications to obtain sufficient protein expression and avoid activation of the innate immune system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA dose of recombinant erythropoietin of about 600 IU/kg appears to be among the highest usually applied in clinical settings.
“(which appears to be among the highest usually applied in clinical settings)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [39] Cheung, 1998, Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of recombinant human erythropoietin after single and multiple subcutaneous doses to healthy subjects, Clin Pharmacol Ther source
- cites [40] McGowan, 2008, Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of extended dosing of epoetin alfa in anemic patients who have chronic kidney disease and are not on dialysis, Clin J Am Soc Nephrol source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe approach currently awaits its first clinical proof of principle.
“Thus, the approach currently awaits its first clinical proof of principle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe present study provides the first proof of mRNA-based therapies being feasible in large animals, even for systemically acting proteins.
“as well as the first proof of mRNA-based therapies being feasible in large animals, even for systemically acting proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenPorcine EPO levels in the supernatant were measured using a mouse EPO ELISA kit with cross reactivity to pig EPO.
“Porcine EPO levels in the supernatant were measured using a mouse EPO ELISA kit (R&D Systems) with cross reactivity to pig EPO and recombinant pig EPO protein (Cusabio, Wuhan, China) as standard.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll experiments were approved by the responsible authorities (Regional Council Tuebingen) and carried out in accordance with national laws.
“All experiments were approved by the responsible authorities (Regional Council Tuebingen) and carried out in accordance with national laws.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenFormulations differ with respect to their characteristics and have probably to be selected on a case-by-case basis.
“However, formulations differ with respect to their characteristics and have probably to be selected on a case-by-case basis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenSerum of cynomolgus monkeys was analyzed with a human EPO ELISA kit that cross reacts with macaque EPO.
“Serum of cynomolgus monkeys was analyzed with a human EPO ELISA kit (R&D Systems) that cross reacts with macaque EPO.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningA protective formulation will be mandatory for systemic delivery due to the ubiquity and abundance of RNases.
“a protective formulation will be mandatory for systemic delivery due to the ubiquity and abundance of RNases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RNases are ubiquitous and abundant.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe ELISA allowed detection of a concentration of anti-EPO antibody as low as about 100 pg/ml.
“The ELISA allowed detection of a concentration of anti-EPO antibody as low as about 100 pg/ml.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Administration of erythropoietin causes a burst release of reticulocytes into the blood stream.
“Administration of erythropoietin causes a burst release of reticulocytes representing precursors of mature erythrocytes into the blood stream.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cytokine release from unmodified mRNA may cause unwanted or detrimental side effects, including a possibly fatal immune response against the encoded protein.
“This cytokine release may cause unwanted or even detrimental side effects such as a possibly fatal immune response against the encoded protein and, thus, should be minimized.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A potential antibody response should be fully developed 4 weeks after the last treatment.
“At that time, a potential antibody response should be fully developed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The effective dose of systemically acting proteins is a function of animal size.
“Particularly for systemically acting proteins, the effective dose will be a function of animal size.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It has yet to be shown that meaningful expression levels can be obtained in animals close to humans in weight with a feasible mRNA dose.
“It has yet to be shown that meaningful expression levels can be obtained in animals close to humans in weight with a feasible mRNA dose.”
The paper relies on this without support.
In vitro expression data may not faithfully predict in vivo features.
“However, in vitro expression data may not faithfully predict in vivo features.”
The paper relies on this without support.
EPO protein has a very short half-life in serum and mRNA is transient, so measurements reflect EPO expression in response to the latest treatment only.
“Due to the very short half-life of EPO protein in serum and the transient nature of mRNA, all measurements reflect EPO expression in response to the latest treatment only.”
The paper relies on this without support.
RNases are ubiquitous and abundant.
“a protective formulation will be mandatory for systemic delivery due to the ubiquity and abundance of RNases.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Our proprietary mRNA technology employs sequence optimization and selected untranslated regions (UTRs) to achieve high antigen expression.
“In recent publications chemically modified nucleosides were used to reach sufficient antigen expression,12–15 which is in contrast to our proprietary mRNA technology, which employs sequence optimization and selected untranslated regions (UTRs) to achieve high antigen expression.16”
From Unmodified mRNA in LNPs constitutes a competitive technology for prophylactic vaccines (2017) · cites this paper as [16]
The Materials and Methods describe codon optimization and selection of 5′ and 3′ UTRs, and the Results report high expression from sequence-engineered mRNA. However, the expression experiments described in the Results use luciferase and erythropoietin, not an antigen; the source does not establish high antigen expression specifically. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPhysiological responses elicited in primates and domestic pigs treated with an mRNA-encoded hormone have suggested the feasibility of mRNA for large animal therapies.
“Physiological responses elicited in primates and domestic pigs treated with an mRNA‐encoded hormone have suggested the feasibility of mRNA for large animal therapies (Thess et al, 2015).”
From mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors (2017) · cites this paper as Thess et al, 2015
It is likely that target-specific mRNA optimizations and further improvements to the formulation can substantially increase efficacy (Thess et al, 2015).
“Thirdly, in light of previous findings, it is likely that target‐specific mRNA optimizations and further improvements to the formulation can substantially increase efficacy (Thess et al, 2015).”
From mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors (2017) · cites this paper as Thess et al, 2015
Short-lived proteins can significantly profit by being expressed from mRNA (Kariko et al, 2012; Thess et al, 2015).
“By contrast, short‐lived proteins can significantly profit by being expressed from mRNA (Kariko et al, 2012; Thess et al, 2015).”
From mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors (2017) · cites this paper as Thess et al, 2015
An earlier study on erythropoietin revealed that findings in a murine model translated to larger animals such as domestic pigs as well as to primates (Thess et al, 2015).
“An earlier study on a different secreted protein, erythropoietin, revealed that findings in a murine model translated to larger animals such as domestic pigs as well as to primates (Thess et al, 2015).”
From mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors (2017) · cites this paper as Thess et al, 2015
Our chemically unmodified mRNA does not stimulate a suppressive immune response per se, which is in line with a previous report on erythropoietin (Thess et al, 2015).
“This clearly suggests that our chemically unmodified mRNA does not stimulate a suppressive immune response per se which is in line with a previous report on erythropoietin (Thess et al, 2015).”
From mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors (2017) · cites this paper as Thess et al, 2015
Thess and colleagues showed that unmodified, GC-rich mRNA engineered with an optimized UTR sequence yielded more sustained antigen expression compared to nucleoside-modified mRNA.
“Thess and colleagues showed that unmodified, GC-rich mRNA engineered with an optimized UTR sequence yielded more sustained antigen expression compared to nucleoside-modified mRNA.183”
From Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development (2022) · cites this paper as [183]
The efficacy of a viral antigen-encoding mRNA vaccine is influenced by codon optimization of the coding sequence, not just in relation to stability and translatability.
“The efficacy of a viral antigen-encoding mRNA vaccine is influenced by codon optimization of the coding sequence,72 but not just in relation to stability and translatability.”
From COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Platforms and current developments (2022) · cites this paper as [72]
A strategy pioneered by CureVac uses sequence engineering and codon optimization to deplete uridines by boosting the GC content of the vaccine mRNA.
“Another strategy to avoid detection by pattern recognition receptors, pioneered by CureVac, uses sequence engineering and codon optimization to deplete uridines by boosting the GC content of the vaccine mRNA26.”
From mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation (2021) · cites this paper as [26]
In their final COVID-19 vaccines, both BioNTech and Moderna used highly-purified and N1-methyl-pseudouridine modified mRNA, whereas CureVac applied unmodified mRNA technology.
“In their final COVID-19 vaccines, both BioNTech and Moderna have made use of a highly-purified and N1-methyl-pseudouridine (1mΨ) modified mRNA. In contrast, CureVac has applied its “unmodified” mRNA vaccine technology”
From The dawn of mRNA vaccines: the COVID-19 case (2021) · cites this paper as [10]
Optimization of the UTRs or the coding sequences results in increased protein expression compared with wild-type controls.
“For example, optimization of the UTRs or the coding sequences results in increased protein expression, compared with wild-type controls107,244.”
From Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery (2021) · cites this paper as [244]
Cites
Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-κB by Toll-like receptor 3
Alexopoulou, L., Holt, A. C., Medzhitov, R., & Flavell, R. A. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35099560 · Cited by 6,129 · see citing works
Direct Gene Transfer into Mouse Muscle in Vivo
Wolff, J. A., Malone, R. W., Williams, P., Chong, W., Acsadi, G., Jani, A., & Felgner, P. L. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1690918 · Cited by 4,173 · see citing works
Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8
Heil, F., Hemmi, H., Hochrein, H., Ampenberger, F., Kirschning, C., Akira, S., Lipford, G., Wagner, H., & Bauer, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093620 · Cited by 3,947 · see citing works
Differential roles of MDA5 and RIG-I helicases in the recognition of RNA viruses
Kato, H., Takeuchi, O., Sato, S., Yoneyama, M., Yamamoto, M., Matsui, K., Uematsu, S., Jung, A., Kawai, T., Ishii, K. J., et al. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04734 · Cited by 3,888 · see citing works
Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA
Diebold, S. S., Kaisho, T., Hemmi, H., Akira, S., & Reis e Sousa, C. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093616 · Cited by 3,444 · see citing works
Karikó, K., Buckstein, M., Ni, H., & Weissman, D. (2005) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.06.008 · Cited by 2,728 · see citing works
Warren, L., Manos, P. D., Ahfeldt, T., Loh, Y.-H., Li, H., Lau, F., Ebina, W., Mandal, P. K., Smith, Z. D., Meissner, A., et al. (2010) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2010.08.012 · Cited by 2,662 · see citing works
5'-Triphosphate RNA Is the Ligand for RIG-I
Hornung, V., Ellegast, J., Kim, S., Brzózka, K., Jung, A., Kato, H., Poeck, H., Akira, S., Conzelmann, K.-K., Schlee, M., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132505 · Cited by 2,474 · see citing works
RIG-I-mediated antiviral responses to single-stranded RNA bearing 5’-phosphates
Pichlmair, A., Schulz, O., Tan, C. P., Näslund, T. I., Liljeström, P., Weber, F., & Reis e Sousa, C. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132998 · Cited by 2,210 · see citing works
Karikó, K., Muramatsu, H., Welsh, F. A., Ludwig, J., Kato, H., Akira, S., & Weissman, D. (2008) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2008.200 · Cited by 1,930 · see citing works
Maximizing the potency of siRNA lipid nanoparticles for hepatic gene silencing in vivo
Jayaraman, M., Ansell, S. M., Mui, B. L., Tam, Y. K., Chen, J., Du, X., Butler, D., Eltepu, L., Matsuda, S., Narayanannair, J. K., et al. (2012) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201203263 · Cited by 1,267 · see citing works
Self-citationTargeted delivery of RNAi therapeutics with endogenous and exogenous ligand-based mechanisms
Akinc, A., Querbes, W., De, S., Qin, J., Frank-Kamenetsky, M., Jayaprakash, K. N., Jayaraman, M., Rajeev, K. G., Cantley, W. L., Dorkin, J. R., et al. (2010) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2010.85 · Cited by 1,261 · see citing works
Safety and efficacy of RNAi therapy for transthyretin amyloidosis
Coelho, T., Adams, D., Silva, A., Lozeron, P., Hawkins, P. N., Mant, T., Perez, J., Chiesa, J., Warrington, S., Tranter, E., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1208760 · Cited by 971 · see citing works
Dendritic cells pulsed with RNA are potent antigen-presenting cells in vitro and in vivo.
Boczkowski, D., Nair, S. K., Snyder, D., & Gilboa, E. (1996) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.184.2.465 · Cited by 915 · see citing works
Karikó, K., Muramatsu, H., Ludwig, J., & Weissman, D. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr695 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Use of Frog Eggs and Oocytes for the Study of Messenger RNA and its Translation in Living Cells
Gurdon, J. B., LANE, C. D., Woodland, H. R., & Marbaix, G. (1971) · Nature · doi:10.1038/233177a0 · Cited by 778 · see citing works
Expression of therapeutic proteins after delivery of chemically modified mRNA in mice
Kormann, M. S. D., Hasenpusch, G., Aneja, M. K., Nica, G., Flemmer, A. W., Herber-Jonat, S., Huppmann, M., Mays, L. E., Illenyi, M., Schams, A., et al. (2011) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.1733 · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA enhances translation by diminishing PKR activation
Anderson, B. R., Muramatsu, H., Nallagatla, S. R., Bevilacqua, P. C., Sansing, L. H., Weissman, D., & Karikó, K. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq347 · Cited by 682 · see citing works
Zangi, L., Lui, K. O., von Gise, A., Ma, Q., Ebina, W., Ptaszek, L. M., Später, D., Xu, H., Tabebordbar, M., Gorbatov, R., et al. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2682 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Maier, M. A., Jayaraman, M., Matsuda, S., Liu, J., Barros, S., Querbes, W., Tam, Y. K., Ansell, S. M., Kumar, V., Qin, J., et al. (2013) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2013.124 · Cited by 625 · see citing works
Self-citationDeveloping mRNA-vaccine technologies
Schlake, T., Thess, A., Fotin-Mleczek, M., & Kallen, K.-J. (2012) · RNA Biology · doi:10.4161/rna.22269 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Self-citationRIG-I detects viral genomic RNA during negative-strand RNA virus infection
Rehwinkel, J., Tan, C. P., Goubau, D., Schulz, O., Pichlmair, A., Bier, K., Robb, N., Vreede, F., Barclay, W., Fodor, E., et al. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.020 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Induction of virus‐specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes <i>in vivo</i> by liposome‐entrapped mRNA
Martinon, F., Krishnan, S., Lenzen, G., Magné, R., Gomard, E., Guillet, J., Lévy, J., & Meulien, P. (1993) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.1830230749 · Cited by 473 · see citing works
Petsch, B., Schnee, M., Vogel, A. B., Lange, E., Hoffmann, B., Voss, D., Schlake, T., Thess, A., Kallen, K.-J., Stitz, L., et al. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2436 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Self-citationWeide, B., Pascolo, S., Scheel, B., Derhovanessian, E., Pflugfelder, A., Eigentler, T. K., Pawelec, G., Hoerr, I., Rammensee, H.-G., & Garbe, C. (2009) · Journal of Immunotherapy · doi:10.1097/cji.0b013e3181a00068 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Anderson, B. R., Muramatsu, H., Jha, B. K., Silverman, R. H., Weissman, D., & Kariko, K. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr586 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Fotin-Mleczek, M., Duchardt, K. M., Lorenz, C., Pfeiffer, R., Ojkić-Zrna, S., Probst, J., & Kallen, K.-J. (2011) · Journal of Immunotherapy · doi:10.1097/cji.0b013e3181f7dbe8 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Self-citation(1995) · PubMed · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Kreiter, S., Selmi, A., Diken, M., Koslowski, M., Britten, C. M., Huber, C., Türeci, Ö., & Sahin, U. (2010) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0699 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Karikó, K., Muramatsu, H., Keller, J. M., & Weissman, D. (2012) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2012.7 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Reversal of Diabetes Insipidus in Brattleboro Rats: Intrahypothalamic Injection of Vasopressin mRNA
Jirikowski, G. F., Sanna, P. P., Maciejewski-Lenoir, D., & Bloom, F. E. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1546298 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Results of the First Phase I/II Clinical Vaccination Trial With Direct Injection of mRNA
Weide, B., Carralot, J.-P., Reese, A., Scheel, B., Eigentler, T. K., Hoerr, I., Rammensee, H.-G., Garbe, C., & Pascolo, S. (2008) · Journal of Immunotherapy · doi:10.1097/cji.0b013e31815ce501 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Rittig, S. M., Haentschel, M., Weimer, K. J., Heine, A., Muller, M. R., Brugger, W., Horger, M. S., Maksimovic, O., Stenzl, A., Hoerr, I., et al. (2011) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1038/mt.2010.289 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
5’-triphosphate-dependent activation of PKR by RNAs with short stem-loops
Nallagatla, S. R., Hwang, J., Toroney, R., Zheng, X., Cameron, C. E., & Bevilacqua, P. C. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1147347 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Probst, J., Weide, B., Scheel, B., Pichler, B. J., Hoerr, I., Rammensee, H.-G., & Pascolo, S. (2007) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/sj.gt.3302964 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Pascolo, S. (2004) · Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy · doi:10.1517/14712598.4.8.1285 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
Modified Foxp3 mRNA protects against asthma through an IL-10-dependent mechanism
Mays, L. E., Ammon-Treiber, S., Mothes, B., Alkhaled, M., Rottenberger, J., Müller-Hermelink, E. S., Grimm, M., Mezger, M., Beer-Hammer, S., von Stebut, E., et al. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci65351 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Cheung, W. K., Goon, B. L., Guilfoyle, M. C., & Wacholtz, M. C. (1998) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0009-9236(98)90072-8 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Therapeutic anti‐tumor immunity triggered by injections of immunostimulating single‐stranded RNA
Scheel, B., Aulwurm, S., Probst, J., Stitz, L., Hoerr, I., Rammensee, H., Weller, M., & Pascolo, S. (2006) · European Journal of Immunology · doi:10.1002/eji.200635910 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
FLT3 Ligand Enhances the Cancer Therapeutic Potency of Naked RNA Vaccines
Kreiter, S., Diken, M., Selmi, A., Diekmann, J., Attig, S., Hüsemann, Y., Koslowski, M., Huber, C., Türeci, Ö., & Şahin, U. (2011) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-11-0291 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Translation of Encephalomyocarditis Viral RNA in Oocytes of Xenopus laevis
Laskey, R. A., Gurdon, J. B., & Crawford, L. V. (1972) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.69.12.3665 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
mTOR Inhibition Improves Antitumor Effects of Vaccination with Antigen-Encoding RNA
Diken, M., Kreiter, S., Vascotto, F., Selmi, A., Attig, S., Diekmann, J., Huber, C., Türeci, Ö., & Şahin, U. (2013) · Cancer Immunology Research · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-13-0046 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
McGowan, T., Vaccaro, N. M., Beaver, J. S., Massarella, J., & Wolfson, M. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.05671207 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Enhancing siRNA delivery by employing lipid nanoparticles
Hope, M. J. (2014) · Therapeutic Delivery · doi:10.4155/tde.14.37 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationHoerr, I. (2000) · doi:10.1002/1521-4141(200001)30:1
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
mRNA vaccines — a new era in vaccinology
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Porter, F. W., & Weissman, D. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2017.243 · Cited by 4,667 · see citing works
Lipid nanoparticles for mRNA delivery
Hou, X., Zaks, T., Langer, R., & Dong, Y. (2021) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-021-00358-0 · Cited by 4,076 · see citing works
The Onpattro story and the clinical translation of nanomedicines containing nucleic acid-based drugs
Akinc, A., Maier, M. A., Manoharan, M., Fitzgerald, K., Jayaraman, M., Barros, S., Ansell, S., Du, X., Hope, M. J., Madden, T. D., et al. (2019) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-019-0591-y · Cited by 1,636 · see citing works
Self-citationmRNA-lipid nanoparticle COVID-19 vaccines: structure and stability
Schoenmaker, L., Witzigmann, D., Kulkarni, J. A., Verbeke, R., Kersten, G., Jiskoot, W., & Crommelin, D. J. A. (2021) · International Journal of Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120586 · Cited by 1,566 · see citing works
“CureVac followed a different path, as outlined by Thess et al. (Thess et al., 2015).”
mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases: principles, delivery and clinical translation
Chaudhary, N., Weissman, D., & Whitehead, K. A. (2021) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-021-00283-5 · Cited by 1,555 · see citing works
Lipid Nanoparticle Systems for Enabling Gene Therapies
Cullis, P. R., & Hope, M. J. (2017) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.03.013 · Cited by 1,208 · see citing works
“03 mg mRNA/kg body weight in non-human primates.(34) These results indicate the potential for utilizing the liver as a factory for protein replacement protocols or as a way to introduce therapeutic proteins, such as monoclonal antibodies, to target malignancies or other pathologies.”
BackgroundSelf-citationDelivering the Messenger: Advances in Technologies for Therapeutic mRNA Delivery
Kowalski, P. S., Rudra, A., Miao, L., & Anderson, D. G. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.02.012 · Cited by 1,127 · see citing works
mRNA vaccine for cancer immunotherapy
Miao, L., Zhang, Y., & Huang, L. (2021) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-021-01335-5 · Cited by 947 · see citing works
“demonstrated that sequence engineered but chemical unmodified mRNA is fully suited for use in mRNA therapies, and the protein expression level was even higher than chemically modified but without codon optimized mRNA, indicating the importance of codon optimization in improving mRNA expression efficiency [40].”
BackgroundZika virus protection by a single low-dose nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccination
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Pelc, R. S., Muramatsu, H., Andersen, H., DeMaso, C. R., Dowd, K. A., Sutherland, L. L., Scearce, R. M., Parks, R., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21428 · Cited by 884 · see citing works
Self-citationThe clinical progress of mRNA vaccines and immunotherapies
Barbier, A. J., Jiang, A. Y., Zhang, P., Wooster, R., & Anderson, D. G. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01294-2 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Sabnis, S., Kumarasinghe, E. S., Salerno, T., Mihai, C., Ketova, T., Senn, J. J., Lynn, A., Bulychev, A., McFadyen, I., Chan, J., et al. (2018) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.03.010 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Tools for translation: non-viral materials for therapeutic mRNA delivery
Hajj, K. A., & Whitehead, K. A. (2017) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2017.56 · Cited by 799 · see citing works
Kauffman, K. J., Dorkin, J. R., Yang, J. H., Heartlein, M. W., DeRosa, F., Mir, F. F., Fenton, O. S., & Anderson, D. G. (2015) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02497 · Cited by 785 · see citing works
mRNA-based therapeutics: powerful and versatile tools to combat diseases
Qin, S., Tang, X., Chen, Y., Chen, K., Fan, N., Xiao, W., Zheng, Q., Li, G., Teng, Y., Wu, M., et al. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01007-w · Cited by 800 · see citing works
“Paradoxically, studies also showed that Ψ modification increased the immune stimulation function of mRNAs and failed to enhance mRNA translation efficiency.(396,397) This opposite conclusion may be related to variations in RNA sequence optimization, stringency of removal of dsRNA contaminants by mRNA purification, and…”
BackgroundAdvances in mRNA Vaccines for Infectious Diseases
Zhang, C., Maruggi, G., Shan, H., & Li, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.00594 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Advances in the delivery of RNA therapeutics: from concept to clinical reality
Kaczmarek, J. C., Kowalski, P. S., & Anderson, D. G. (2017) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0450-0 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
“Similarly, LNPs formulated with mRNA encoding erythropoietin (Epo) have been shown to elicit a systemic physiological response in large animals, including pigs and nonhuman primates [93].”
BackgroundUnlocking the promise of mRNA therapeutics
Rohner, E., Yang, R., Foo, K. S., Goedel, A., & Chien, K. R. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01491-z · Cited by 612 · see citing works
Advances in COVID-19 mRNA vaccine development
Fang, E., Liu, X., Li, M., Zhang, Z., Song, L., Zhu, B., Wu, X., Liu, J., Zhao, D., & Li, Y. (2022) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-022-00950-y · Cited by 601 · see citing works
“Thess and colleagues showed that unmodified, GC-rich mRNA engineered with an optimized UTR sequence yielded more sustained antigen expression compared to nucleoside-modified mRNA.(183) In contrast, Pardi Table 1.”
ResultLipid nanoparticles for nucleic acid delivery: Current perspectives
Samaridou, E., Heyes, J. A., & Lutwyche, P. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.002 · Cited by 593 · see citing works
Lipid nanoparticles enabling gene therapies: from concepts to clinical utility
Kulkarni, J. A., Cullis, P. R., & van der Meel, R. (2018) · Nucleic Acid Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/nat.2018.0721 · Cited by 592 · see citing works
Nanomaterial Delivery Systems for mRNA Vaccines
Buschmann, M. D., Carrasco, M. J., Alishetty, S., Paige, M., Alameh, M. G., & Weissman, D. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9010065 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
“A second approach pursued by CureVac is sequence engineering involving codon optimization and uridine depletion [25] since TLR7 and TLR8 primarily recognize GU-rich single-stranded RNA sequences [26].”
BackgroundWang, H.-X., Li, M., Lee, C. M., Chakraborty, S., Kim, H.-W., Bao, G., & Leong, K. W. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00799 · Cited by 560 · see citing works
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., Naradikian, M. S., Parkhouse, K., Cain, D. W., Jones, L., Moody, M. A., Verkerke, H. P., Myles, A., Willis, E., et al. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20171450 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
“, HPLC) and a sequence engineering protocol that includes a reduction in the number of uridines (Kallen et al., 2013; Thess et al., 2015).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationLipid Nanoparticle Technology for Clinical Translation of siRNA Therapeutics
Kulkarni, J. A., Witzigmann, D., Chen, S., Cullis, P. R., & van der Meel, R. (2019) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00368 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
New Vaccine Technologies to Combat Outbreak Situations
Rauch, S., Jasny, E., Schmidt, K. E., & Petsch, B. (2018) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.01963 · Cited by 579 · see citing works
“As shown by Thess and colleagues, sequenceoptimized, unmodifiedmRNA led to higher protein expression in vitro in HeLa cells and in vivo in mice than the respective mRNA containing modified nucleosides (123).”
BackgroundmRNA as a Transformative Technology for Vaccine Development to Control Infectious Diseases
Maruggi, G., Zhang, C., Li, J., Ulmer, J. B., & Yu, D. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.01.020 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
“Thess et al.(45) have shown that an mRNA sequence enriched in G:C content and carrying optimized UTRs is superior to a nucleoside-modified counterpart in vitro and in vivo.”
BackgroundClinical advances and ongoing trials of mRNA vaccines for cancer treatment
Lorentzen, C. L., Haanen, J. B. A. G., Met, Ö., & Svane, I. M. (2022) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00372-2 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Kim, J., Eygeris, Y., Gupta, M., & Sahay, G. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.12.014 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Recent advances in mRNA vaccine technology
Pardi, N., Hogan, M. J., & Weissman, D. (2020) · Current Opinion in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.coi.2020.01.008 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
The landscape of mRNA nanomedicine
Huang, X., Kong, N., Zhang, X., Cao, Y., Langer, R., & Tao, W. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02061-1 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
The 60-year evolution of lipid nanoparticles for nucleic acid delivery
Cullis, P. R., & Felgner, P. L. (2024) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-024-00977-6 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
The dawn of mRNA vaccines: the COVID-19 case
Verbeke, R., Lentacker, I., De Smedt, S. C., & Dewitte, H. (2021) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.03.043 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
“In contrast, CureVac has applied its “unmodified” mRNA vaccine technology, which employs sequence optimization and selected untranslated regions (UTRs) to enhance mRNA translation, while keeping a balanced type I IFN activity [10,11].”
Innate immune mechanisms of mRNA vaccines
Verbeke, R., Hogan, M. J., Loré, K., & Pardi, N. (2022) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2022.10.014 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
The promise of mRNA vaccines: a biotech and industrial perspective
Jackson, N. A. C., Kester, K. E., Casimiro, D., Gurunathan, S., & DeRosa, F. (2020) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-020-0159-8 · Cited by 498 · see citing works
Self-amplifying RNA vaccines for infectious diseases
Bloom, K., van den Berg, F., & Arbuthnot, P. (2021) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41434-020-00204-y · Cited by 487 · see citing works
Modifications in an Emergency: The Role of N1-Methylpseudouridine in COVID-19 Vaccines
Nance, K. D., & Meier, J. L. (2021) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.1c00197 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
mRNA vaccine: a potential therapeutic strategy
Wang, Y., Zhang, Z., Luo, J., Han, X., Wei, Y., & Wei, X. (2021) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-021-01311-z · Cited by 422 · see citing works
The challenge and prospect of mRNA therapeutics landscape
Weng, Y., Li, C., Yang, T., Hu, B., Zhang, M., Guo, S., Xiao, H., Liang, X.-J., & Huang, Y. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107534 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
Chahal, J. S., Khan, O. F., Cooper, C. L., McPartlan, J. S., Tsosie, J. K., Tilley, L. D., Sidik, S. M., Lourido, S., Langer, R., Bavari, S., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1600299113 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Combinatorial optimization of mRNA structure, stability, and translation for RNA-based therapeutics
Leppek, K., Byeon, G. W., Kladwang, W., Wayment-Steele, H. K., Kerr, C. H., Xu, A. F., Kim, D. S., Topkar, V. V., Choe, C., Rothschild, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28776-w · Cited by 399 · see citing works
“CAI was calculated as the geometric mean of the relative usage frequency of codons along the length of the coding region, as previously reported46 (9):”
MethodCombinatorial optimization of mRNA structure, stability, and translation for RNA-based therapeutics
Leppek, K., Byeon, G. W., Kladwang, W., Wayment-Steele, H. K., Kerr, C. H., Xu, A. F., Kim, D. S., Topkar, V. V., Choe, C., Rothschild, D., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.03.29.437587 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Materials for non-viral intracellular delivery of messenger RNA therapeutics
Kauffman, K. J., Webber, M. J., & Anderson, D. G. (2015) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.12.032 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Cytosolic delivery of nucleic acids: The case of ionizable lipid nanoparticles
Schlich, M., Palomba, R., Costabile, G., Mizrahy, S., Pannuzzo, M., Peer, D., & Decuzzi, P. (2021) · Bioengineering & Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/btm2.10213 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
“More recently, the use of LNPs as nucleic acid vectors was extended to mRNA.(71) Compared to siRNAs, mRNAs have larger”
Nanotechnologies in delivery of mRNA therapeutics using nonviral vector-based delivery systems
Guan, S., & Rosenecker, J. (2017) · Gene Therapy · doi:10.1038/gt.2017.5 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Lipid nanoparticle technology for therapeutic gene regulation in the liver
Witzigmann, D., Kulkarni, J. A., Leung, J., Chen, S., Cullis, P. R., & van der Meel, R. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.026 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
“Initial studies that showed clear clinical utility are briefly highlighted here: Intravenous administration of LNP-mRNA encoding erythropoietin (EPO) resulted in increased EPO serum levels corresponding to increased reticulocyte, and elevated hematocrit in porcine and non-human primate (NHP) models [203].”
Heinz, F., & Stiasny, K. (2021) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-021-00369-6 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Review of the Global Efforts on COVID-19 Vaccine Development
Li, Y., Tenchov, R., Smoot, J., Liu, C., Watkins, S., & Zhou, Q. A. (2021) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.1c00120 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Impact of mRNA chemistry and manufacturing process on innate immune activation
Nelson, J., Sorensen, E. W., Mintri, S., Rabideau, A. E., Zheng, W., Besin, G., Khatwani, N., Su, S. V., Miracco, E. J., Issa, W. J., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz6893 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
“Although some studies suggest that purification of unmodified mRNA is sufficient to achieve effective mRNA-based therapeutics, the measures of immune stimulation reported typically included serum activation markers and protein expression levels ( 46 ).”
COVID-19 mRNA vaccines: Platforms and current developments
Szabó, G. T., Mahiny, A. J., & Vlatkovic, I. (2022) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2022.02.016 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Recent advances in exosome-mediated nucleic acid delivery for cancer therapy
Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Zhang, X., Huang, H., Tang, S., Chai, Y., Xu, Z., Li, M., Chen, X., Liu, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01472-z · Cited by 306 · see citing works
“It has been considered as another promising tool for the treatment of a variety of diseases, especially cancer [74, 75].”
BackgroundThe Biomolecular Corona of Lipid Nanoparticles for Gene Therapy
Francia, V., Schiffelers, R. M., Cullis, P. R., & Witzigmann, D. (2020) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.0c00366 · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Role of nanotechnology behind the success of mRNA vaccines for COVID-19
Khurana, A., Allawadhi, P., Khurana, I., Allwadhi, S., Weiskirchen, R., Banothu, A. K., Chhabra, D., Joshi, K., & Bharani, K. K. (2021) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101142 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Pardi, N., Parkhouse, K., Kirkpatrick, E., McMahon, M., Zost, S. J., Mui, B. L., Tam, Y. K., Karikó, K., Barbosa, C. J., Madden, T. D., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05482-0 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Critical Contribution of Pseudouridine to mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines
Morais, P., Adachi, H., & Yu, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.789427 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
“At that time, the consensus in the medical field was that a safe and effective vaccine would need at least 12–18 months to be developed (Thorp, 2020).”
Principles for designing an optimal mRNA lipid nanoparticle vaccine
Kon, E., Elia, U., & Peer, D. (2022) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2021.09.016 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
“However, preliminary phase 2b/3 data indicates that the vaccine candidate was substantially less effective than the other two leading mRNA vaccines by Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) (NCT04652102) [12,13].”
BackgroundMethodCircular RNA vaccine in disease prevention and treatment
Niu, D., Wu, Y., & Lian, J. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01561-x · Cited by 273 · see citing works
“92 To overcome this limitation, the rational design of minimalistic protein-binding motifs may be promising for improving circRNA translation.”
BackgroundVaidyanathan, S., Azizian, K. T., Haque, A. K. M. A., Henderson, J. M., Hendel, A., Shore, S., Antony, J. S., Hogrefe, R. I., Kormann, M. S. D., Porteus, M. H., et al. (2018) · Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids · doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2018.06.010 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
“Thess et al.56 sequenceengineered luciferase and Epo mRNAs by using only the most guanosine/cytosine (GC)-rich codons.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialLipid-based nanoparticle technologies for liver targeting
Böttger, R., Pauli, G., Chao, P., Fayez, N. A., Hohenwarter, L., & Li, S. (2020) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2020.06.017 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
From influenza to COVID-19: Lipid nanoparticle mRNA vaccines at the frontiers of infectious diseases
Pilkington, E. H., Suys, E. J. A., Trevaskis, N. L., Wheatley, A. K., Zukancic, D., Algarni, A., Al-Wassiti, H. A., Davis, T. P., Pouton, C. W., Kent, S. J., et al. (2021) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.06.023 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Unmodified mRNA in LNPs constitutes a competitive technology for prophylactic vaccines
Lutz, J., Lazzaro, S., Habbeddine, M., Schmidt, K. E., Baumhof, P., Mui, B. L., Tam, Y. K., Madden, T. D., Hope, M. J., Heidenreich, R., et al. (2017) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-017-0032-6 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
“The LNPs used in this study are 70–100 nm particles, prepared using an ionizable amino lipid, phospholipid, cholesterol and a PEGylated lipid, and are similar in composition to the LNPs that have recently proven to be safe and efficient tools for siRNA delivery.(16,27,34)”
MethodSelf-citationmRNA Vaccines in the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond
Hogan, M. J., & Pardi, N. (2021) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-042420-112725 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Bioinspired Alkenyl Amino Alcohol Ionizable Lipid Materials for Highly Potent In Vivo mRNA Delivery
Fenton, O. S., Kauffman, K. J., McClellan, R. L., Appel, E. A., Dorkin, J. R., Tibbitt, M. W., Heartlein, M. W., DeRosa, F., Langer, R., & Anderson, D. G. (2016) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201505822 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Genome Editing with mRNA Encoding ZFN, TALEN, and Cas9
Zhang, H., Zhang, Y., & Yin, H. (2019) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.01.014 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
mRNA vaccines in disease prevention and treatment
Zhang, G., Tang, T., Chen, Y., Huang, X., & Liang, T. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01579-1 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“17,247,248 The interaction of the delivery carrier mRNA and innate immune system requires further investigation to achieve an effective balance.”
BackgroundLipid Nanoparticles as Delivery Systems for RNA-Based Vaccines
Aldosari, B. N., Alfagih, I. M., & Almurshedi, A. S. (2021) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13020206 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
“Comparison of the efficacy of sequence-optimized mRNA to its nucleoside-modified counterpart revealed unclear results that were attributed to differences in various parameters such as the sequence optimization algorithms, type of modified nucleosides, route of administration, and other experimental conditions [6,7].”
BackgroundAn RNA toolbox for cancer immunotherapy
Pastor, F., Berraondo, P., Etxeberria, I., Frederick, J., Sahin, U., Gilboa, E., & Melero, I. (2018) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2018.132 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
The Storage and In-Use Stability of mRNA Vaccines and Therapeutics: Not A Cold Case
Blenke, E. O., Örnskov, E., Schöneich, C., Nilsson, G. Å., Volkin, D. B., Mastrobattista, E., Almarsson, Ö., & Crommelin, D. J. A. (2022) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.xphs.2022.11.001 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
How mRNA therapeutics are entering the monoclonal antibody field
Van Hoecke, L., & Roose, K. (2019) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-019-1804-8 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Xu, Z., Miao, L., & Huang, L. (2018) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.11.009 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Sedic, M., Senn, J. J., Lynn, A., Laska, M., Smith, M., Platz, S. J., Bolen, J., Hoge, S., Bulychev, A., Jacquinet, E., et al. (2018) · Veterinary Pathology · doi:10.1177/0300985817738095 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
“Consistent with this, neutrophil, monocyte, and atypical lymphocyte counts were elevated across all groups dosed with hEPO-mRNA in LNPs. Interestingly, administration of hEPO-mRNA in LNPs once weekly or empty LNPs did not elicit the same increase in white blood cells (Fig.”
MethodInfluentialKauffman, K. J., Mir, F. F., Jhunjhunwala, S., Kaczmarek, J. C., Hurtado, J. E., Yang, J. H., Webber, M. J., Kowalski, P. S., Heartlein, M. W., DeRosa, F., et al. (2016) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.09.006 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Platforms for Production of Protein-Based Vaccines: From Classical to Next-Generation Strategies
Cid, R., & Bolívar, J. (2021) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom11081072 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
“Furthermore, maximization of GC (guanine–cytosine) content in combination with codon optimization by selection of frequent codons in the coding region also allows to enhanced stability and translation [80,81].”
BackgroundChemically Modified Platforms for Better RNA Therapeutics
Shi, Y., Zhen, X., Zhang, Y., Li, Y., Koo, S., Saiding, Q., Kong, N., Liu, G., Chen, W., & Tao, W. (2024) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00611 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Lipid Nanoparticles for Delivery of mRNA
Yang, L., Gong, L., Wang, P., Zhao, X., Zhao, F. H., Zhang, Z., Li, Y., & Huang, W. (2022) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14122682 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
“Bypassing codon simplicity and enriching guanine–cytosine (GC) content has now been shown to increase protein levels in vivo [59].”
BackgroundDisease X: accelerating the development of medical countermeasures for the next pandemic
Simpson, S., Kaufmann, M. C., Glozman, V., & Chakrabarti, A. C. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30123-7 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Therapeutic HNF4A mRNA attenuates liver fibrosis in a preclinical model
Yang, T., Poenisch, M., Khanal, R., Hu, Q., Dai, Z., Li, R., Song, G., Yuan, Q., Yao, Q., Shen, X., et al. (2021) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.08.011 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
mRNA mediates passive vaccination against infectious agents, toxins, and tumors
Thran, M., Mukherjee, J., Pönisch, M., Fiedler, K., Thess, A., Mui, B. L., Hope, M. J., Tam, Y. K., Horscroft, N., Heidenreich, R., et al. (2017) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201707678 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
“To provide prolonged mRNA stability and efficient protein translation, a previously approved format for liver expression harboring crucial regulatory mRNA elements was used (Fig 1A and D; Thess et al, 2015).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationRui, Y., Wilson, D. R., Tzeng, S. Y., Yamagata, H. M., Sudhakar, D., Conge, M., Berlinicke, C. A., Zack, D. J., Tuesca, A. D., & Green, J. J. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk2855 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Research Advances on the Stability of mRNA Vaccines
Cheng, F., Wang, Y., Bai, Y., Liang, Z., Mao, Q., Liu, D., Wu, X., & Xu, M. (2023) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v15030668 · Cited by 171 · see citing works
Minnaert, A.-K., Vanluchene, H., Verbeke, R., Lentacker, I., De Smedt, S. C., Raemdonck, K., Sanders, N. N., & Remaut, K. (2021) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113900 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
“[76] and viral UTRs from VEEV [77] and SINV [78].”
InfluentialRizvi, F., Everton, E., Smith, A. R., Liu, H., Osota, E., Beattie, M. B., Tam, Y. K., Pardi, N., Weissman, D., & Gouon–Evans, V. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20903-3 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Blakney, A. K., Zhu, Y., McKay, P. F., Bouton, C. R., Yeow, J., Tang, J., Hu, K., Samnuan, K., Grigsby, C. L., Shattock, R. J., et al. (2020) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c00326 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Qin, F., Xia, F., Chen, H., Cui, B., Feng, Y., Zhang, P., Chen, J., & Luo, M. (2021) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.633776 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Effects of Chemically Modified Messenger RNA on Protein Expression
Li, B., Luo, X. L., & Dong, Y. (2016) · Bioconjugate Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.6b00090 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Beyond Just Peptide Antigens: The Complex World of Peptide-Based Cancer Vaccines
Stephens, A. J., Burgess-Brown, N., & Jiang, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.696791 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
“RNA vaccines are also relatively unstable, and can produce strong unwanted innate immune responses (44, 45), however with modifications to reduce these issues, mRNA vaccines are showing themselves to be promising cancer vaccine candidates (46).”
BackgroundGranot-Matok, Y., & Peer, D. (2017) · Seminars in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.smim.2017.08.015 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
“ization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2) that can also sense ssRNA [4,6].”
BackgroundInfluentialSARS-CoV-2 vaccines and autoimmune diseases amidst the COVID-19 crisis
Velikova, T. V., & Georgiev, T. (2021) · Rheumatology International · doi:10.1007/s00296-021-04792-9 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Tailor made: the art of therapeutic mRNA design
Metkar, M., Pepin, C. S., & Moore, M. J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-023-00827-x · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Kowalski, P. S., Palmiero, U. C., Huang, Y., Rudra, A., Langer, R., & Anderson, D. G. (2018) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201801151 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Non-viral delivery of the CRISPR/Cas system: DNA versus RNA versus RNP
Lin, Y., Wagner, E., & Lächelt, U. (2022) · Biomaterials Science · doi:10.1039/d1bm01658j · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Nanomedicine-Based Approaches for mRNA Delivery
Uchida, S., Perche, F., Pichon, C., & Cabral, H. (2020) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c00618 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Synthetic biology in the clinic: engineering vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics
Tan, X., Letendre, J. H., Collins, J. J., & Wong, W. W. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.017 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
“This significantly enhances protein production through unclear mechanisms when matched to optimized 50 and 30 UTRs (Thess et al., 2015).”
BackgroundKnife’s edge: Balancing immunogenicity and reactogenicity in mRNA vaccines
Lee, J., Woodruff, M. C., Kim, E. H., & Nam, J. (2023) · Experimental & Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1038/s12276-023-00999-x · Cited by 137 · see citing works
mRNA as novel technology for passive immunotherapy
Schlake, T., Theß, A., Thran, M., & Jordan, I. (2018) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-018-2935-4 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
“Among them, TransIT has been repeatedly used for in vivo studies [188, 218, 264] .”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationAntigen Presentation of mRNA-Based and Virus-Vectored SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines
Rijkers, G. T., Weterings, N., Obregón‐Henao, A., Dutt, T., Dutt, T. S., van Overveld, F. J., & Henao-Tamayo, M. I. (2021) · Vaccines · doi:10.3390/vaccines9080848 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
“It should be noted, however, that some groups recently questioned the absolute requirement of modified nucleosides for efficient protein expression from mRNA-based vectors [38].”
BackgroundTrepotec, Z., Geiger, J., Plank, C., Aneja, M. K., & Rudolph, C. (2019) · RNA · doi:10.1261/rna.069286.118 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
“As an additional benchmark, a previously published construct (Thess et al. 2015) comprising homopolymeric A stretch (A63), homopolymeric C stretch (C31) and histone stem– loop (ACH; Fig.”
BackgroundLei, L., Huang, D., Gao, H., He, B., Cao, J., & Peppas, N. A. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adc8738 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Nanoplatforms for mRNA Therapeutics
Meng, C., Chen, Z., Li, G., Welte, T., & Shen, H. (2021) · Advanced Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/adtp.202000099 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Zhang, H., Vandesompele, J., Braeckmans, K., Smedt, S. C. D., & Remaut, K. (2023) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d3cs00194f · Cited by 140 · see citing works
mRNA Delivery by a pH‐Responsive DNA Nano‐Hydrogel
Fu, X., Chen, T., Song, Y., Feng, C., Chen, H., Zhang, Q., Chen, G., & Zhu, X. (2021) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202101224 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thess, A., Grund, S., Mui, B. L., Hope, M. J., Baumhof, P., Fotin-Mleczek, M., & Schlake, T.
- Affiliations
- CureVac (Germany) (DE)
- Acuitas Therapeutics (Canada) (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Schlake, Thomas
- Venue
- Molecular Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1456-1464
- ISSN
- 1525-0016 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4817881
- OpenAlex
- W1538766821
- Semantic Scholar
- ba6194e7bb15ea1a7e676b261ee348f90c99f8b7
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 5
- FWCI
- 9.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Molecular Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
- Keywords
- erythropoietin, lipid nanoparticles, non-human primates, pigs, innate immune activation, erythropoiesis, large animal model, mRNA therapeutics
- MeSH terms
- Silent Mutation, Animals, Cell Line, Erythrocyte Indices, Erythropoietin, Humans, Lipids, Macaca fascicularis, RNA, Messenger, Genetic Therapy, Gene Expression, Genes, Reporter, Models, Animal, Sus scrofa, Mice, Nanoparticles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review