CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 26

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Shifts in Composition and Activity of Oral Biofilms After Fluoride Exposure

López-López, A., Mira, A.·2020·Microbial Ecology
DOI 10.1007/s00248-020-01531-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00248-020-01531-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Berger D, Rakhamimova A, Pollack A, Loewy Z (2018) Oral biofilms: development, control, and analysis. High-Throughput 7:24. https://doi.org/10.3390/ht7030024 · DOI
  2. Xu X, Chen F, Huang Z, Ma L, Chen L, Pan Y et al (2018) Meeting report: a close look at oral biofilms and microbiomes. J Oral Sci 10:28. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-018-0030-1 · DOI
  3. Marsh PD (2006) Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community–implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health 6:S14. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-6-S1-S14 · DOI · Paper page
  4. ten Cate JM (2013) Contemporary perspective on the use of fluoride products in caries prevention. Br Dent J 214:161–167. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.162 · DOI
  5. Marquis RE, Clock SA, Mota-Meira M (2003) Fluoride and organic weak acids as modulators of microbial physiology. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:493–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j1574-69762003tb00627x · DOI
  6. Van Loveren C (2001) Antimicrobial activity of fluoride and its in vivo importance: identification of research questions. Caries Res 35(Suppl 1):65–70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000049114 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Reilly C, Goettl M, Steinmetz M, Nikrad J, Jones RS (2016) Short-term effects of povidone iodine and sodium fluoride therapy on plaque levels and microbiome diversity. Oral Dis 22:155–161. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi12407 · DOI
  8. Koopman JE et al (2015) The effect of fixed orthodontic appliances and fluoride mouthwash on the oral microbiome of adolescents–a randomized controlled clinical trial. PLoS One 10:e0137318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journalpone0137318 · DOI
  9. Rosin-Grget K, Peros K, Sutej I, Basic K (2013) The cariostatic mechanisms of fluoride. Acta Med Acad 42:179–188. https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-12485 · DOI
  10. Ferrer MD et al (2016) Effect of antibiotics on biofilm inhibition and induction measured by real-time cell analysis. J Appl Microbiol 122:640–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam13368 · DOI
  11. Mira A et al (2019) Development of an in vitro system to study oral biofilms in real time through impedance technology: validation and potential applications. J Oral Microbiol 11:1609838. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000229720191609838 · DOI
  12. Nyvad B, Crielaard W, Mira A, Takahashi N, Beighton D (2013) Dental caries from a molecular microbiological perspective. Caries Res 47:89–102. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345367 · DOI
  13. Lagerlof F, Oliveby A, Ekstrand J (1987) Physiological factors influencing salivary clearance of sugar and fluoride. J Dent Res 66:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660020801 · DOI
  14. Dzidic M et al (2018) Oral microbiome development during childhood: an ecological succession influenced by postnatal factors and associated with tooth decay. ISME J 12:2292–2306. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0204-z · DOI · Paper page
  15. Benítez-Páez A, Belda-Ferre P, Simón-Soro A, Mira A (2014) Microbiota diversity and gene expression dynamics in the human oral biofilm. BMC Genomics 15:311–323. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-311 · DOI
  16. Schmieder R, Edwards R (2011) Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 27:863–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026 · DOI
  17. Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 · DOI
  18. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR (2007) Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM00062-07 · DOI
  19. Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJA, Holmes SP (2016) DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods 13:581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth3869 · DOI
  20. Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG (2014) STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30:3123–3124. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494 · DOI
  21. Magoc T, Salzberg SL (2011) FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27:2957–2963. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Quast C et al (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D590–D596. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1219 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Langmead B, Salzberg S (2012) Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1923 · DOI
  24. Li D et al (2016) MEGAHIT v10: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods 1:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/jymeth201602020 · DOI
  25. Rice P, Longden I, Bleasby A (2000) EMBOSS: the European Molecular biology open software suite. Trends Genet 16:276–277 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kanehisa M, Goto S (2000) KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 28:27–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28127 · DOI
  27. Durbin R, Eddy SR, Krogh A, Mitchison GJ (1998) Biological sequence analysis: probabilistic models of proteins and nucleic acids. UK Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · DOI
  28. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Naumova EA et al (2012) Fluoride bioavailability in saliva and plaque. BMC Oral Health 12:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-12-3 · DOI
  30. Rosier BT, Marsh PD, Mira A (2018) Resilience of the oral microbiota in health: mechanisms that prevent dysbiosis. J Dent Res 97:371–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517742139 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Wescombe PA, Hale JD, Heng NC, Tagg JR (2012) Developing oral probiotics from Streptococcus salivarius. Future Microbiol 7:1355–1371. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb12113 · DOI
  32. Liao Y, Brandt BW, Li J, Crielaard W, Van Loveren C, Deng DM (2017) Fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans: a mini review. J Oral Microbiol 9(1):1344509 · DOI
  33. Klug B, Santigli E, Westendorf C et al (2016) From mouth to model: combining in vivo and in vitro oral biofilm growth. Front Microbiol 21:1448
  34. Simón-Soro A, Belda-Ferre P, Cabrera-Rubio R, Alcaraz LD, Mira A (2013) A tissue-dependent hypothesis of dental caries. Caries Res 47:591–600 · DOI
  35. Hamilton IR (1990) Biochemical effects of fluoride on oral bacteria. J Dent Res 69:660–667; discussion 682-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690S128 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Takahashi N, Washio J (2011) Metabolomic effects of xylitol and fluoride on plaque biofilm in vivo. J Dent Res 90:1463–1468. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034511423395 · DOI
  37. Belli WA, Marquis RE (1994) Catabolite modification of acid tolerance of Streptococcus mutans GS-5. Oral Microbiol Immunol 9:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j1399-302x1994tb00211x · DOI
  38. Murata T, Hanada N (2016) Contribution of chloride channel permease to fluoride resistance in Streptococcus mutans. FEMS Microbiol Lett 363:fnw101. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fnw101 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Huang X, Schulte RM, Burne RA, Nascimento MM (2015) Characterization of the arginolytic microflora provides insights into pH homeostasis in human oral biofilms. Caries Res 49:165–176. https://doi.org/10.1159/000365296 · DOI
  40. Burne RA, Marquis RE (2000) Alkali production by oral bacteria and protection against dental caries. FEMS Microbiol Lett 193:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb09393.x · DOI · Paper page
  41. López-López A, Camelo-Castillo A, Ferrer MD, Simón-Soro A, Mira A (2017) Health-associated niche inhabitants as oral probiotics: the case of Streptococcus dentisani. Front Microbiol 8:379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb201700379 · DOI
  42. Nascimento MM et al (2019) Metabolic profile of supragingival plaque exposed to arginine and fluoride. J Dent Res 98:1245–1252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034519869906 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Huang X et al (2017) Effect of arginine on the growth and biofilm formation of oral bacteria. Arch Oral Biol 82:256–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/jarchoralbio201706026 · DOI
  44. Thurnheer T, Belibasakis GN (2018) Effect of sodium fluoride on oral biofilm microbiota and enamel demineralization. Arch Oral Biol 89:77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/jarchoralbio201802010 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
López-López, A., & Mira, A.
ORCID
Mira, A.
Venue
Microbial Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-06-11
Volume
80
Issue
3
Pages
729-738
ISSN
  • 0095-3628
  • 1432-184X
DOI
10.1007/s00248-020-01531-8
Cited by
26
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (RTI 2018-102032-B-100)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review