Cited by 152Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants

Open access

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainable animal production is compelling researchers to explore the potential approaches to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases from livestock that are mainly produced by enteric fermentation. Some potential solutions, for instance, the use of chemical inhibitors to reduce methanogenesis, are not feasible in routine use due to their toxicity to ruminants, inhibition of efficient rumen function or other transitory effects. Strategies, such as use of plant secondary metabolites and dietary manipulations have emerged to reduce the methane emission, but these still require extensive research before these can be recommended and deployed in the livestock industry sector. Furthermore, immunization vaccines for methanogens and phages are also under investigation for mitigation of enteric methanogenesis. The increasing knowledge of methanogenic diversity in rumen, DNA sequencing technologies and bioinformatics have paved the way for chemogenomic strategies by targeting methane producers. Chemogenomics will help in finding target enzymes and proteins, which will further assist in the screening of natural as well chemical inhibitors. The construction of a methanogenic gene catalogue through these approaches is an attainable objective. This will lead to understand the microbiome function, its relation with the host and feeds, and therefore, will form the basis of practically viable and eco-friendly methane mitigation approaches, while improving the ruminant productivity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00253-013-5365-0

Cites

163 of 163 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 163 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bhatta R, Saravanan M, Baruah L, Dhali A, Kolte A, Prasad CS (2013) Effect of graded levels of tropical leaves containing-secondary metabolites on rumen fermentation pattern, protozoa population and methanogenesis in vitro. Adv Anim Biosci 4(2):307
  2. Cammack KM, Ellison MJ, Conant GC, Austin KJ, Lamberson WR (2013) Effect of diet type and feed efficiency status on rumen microbial populations in sheep. Cambridge University Press, Dublin, p 372, In 5th Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture Conference
  3. Haisan J, Sun Y, Beauchemin K, Guan L, Duval S, Barreda DR, Oba M (2013) Effects of feeding 3-nitrooxypropanol, at varying levels, on methane emissions and rumen fermentation in lactating dairy cows. Adv Anim Biosci 4(2):326
  4. Jakhesara S, Koringa P, Ramani U, Ahir V, Tripathi A, Soni P, Singh K, Bhatt V, Patel J, Patel M (2010) Comparative study of tannin challenged rumen microbiome in goat using high throughput sequencing technology. Dev Microbiol Mol Biol 1:95–106
  5. Ludemann CI, Eckard RJ, Smith KF (2013) Potential effects of time of cutting and plant genotypes and gas production from fermentation of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) using dairy cow rumen. Adv Anim Biosci 4(2):424
  6. Martinez-Fernndez G, Arco A, Abecia L, Cantalapiedra-Hijar G, Moline-Alcaide E, Martin-Garcia AI, Kindermann M, Duval S, Yanez-ruiz DR (2013) The addition of ethyl-3-nitrooxy propionate and 3-nitrooxypropanol in the diet of sheep substantially reduces methane emissions and the effect persists over a month. Adv Anim Biosci 4(2):368
  7. Russell JB (2002) Rumen microbiology and its role in rumen nutrition, 1st edn. Russell, Ithaca

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–152 of 152

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, S., Choudhury, P. K., Carro, M. D., Griffith, G. W., Dagar, S. S., Puniya, M., Calabro, S., Ravella, S. R., Dhewa, T., Upadhyay, R. C., Sirohi, S. K., Kundu, S. S., Wanapat, M., & Puniya, A. K.
Affiliations
  • National Dairy Research Institute (IN)
  • Aberystwyth University (GB)
  • University of Delhi (IN)
  • Khon Kaen University (TH)
Corresponding author
Puniya, Anil Kumar
Venue
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2013-11-19
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
31-44
ISSN
  • 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0614
OpenAlex
W2057355207
Cited by
152
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • KRIBB Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Archivo Digital UPM (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
enteric methane mitigation, ruminants, methanogenesis, enteric fermentation, livestock greenhouse gas emissions, plant secondary metabolites, dietary intervention, phage therapy, chemogenomics, methanogenic archaea, rumen microbiome, methane inhibitors
MeSH terms
Animals, Methane, Ruminants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review