The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Probiotic lactobacilli inhibit early stages of Candida albicans biofilm development by reducing their growth, cell adhesion, and filamentation
Open accessAbstract
We evaluated the inhibitory effects of the probiotic Lactobacillus species on different phases of Candida albicans biofilm development. Quantification of biofilm growth and ultrastructural analyses were performed on C. albicans biofilms treated with Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus casei, and Lactobacillus acidophilus planktonic cell suspensions as well as their supernatants. Planktonic lactobacilli induced a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the number of biofilm cells (25.5-61.8 %) depending on the probiotic strain and the biofilm phase. L. rhamnosus supernatants had no significant effect on the mature biofilm (p > 0.05), but significantly reduced the early stages of Candida biofilm formation (p < 0.01). Microscopic analyses revealed that L. rhamnosus suspensions reduced Candida hyphal differentiation, leading to a predominance of budding growth. All lactobacilli negatively impacted C. albicans yeast-to-hyphae differentiation and biofilm formation. The inhibitory effects of the probiotic Lactobacillus on C. albicans entailed both cell-cell interactions and secretion of exometabolites that may impact on pathogenic attributes associated with C. albicans colonization on host surfaces and yeast filamentation. This study clarifies, for the first time, the mechanics of how Lactobacillus species may antagonize C. albicans host colonization. Our data elucidate the inhibitory mechanisms that define the probiotic candicidal activity of lactobacilli, thus supporting their utility as an adjunctive therapeutic mode against mucosal candidal infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In vitro studies have shown that exogenous Lactobacilli inhibit the formation of C. albicans biofilm [39].”
From Treatment of Vulvovaginal Candidiasis—An Overview of Guidelines and the Latest Treatment Methods (2023) · cites this paper as [39]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, M. B., & Bassler, B. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.165 · Cited by 5,127
Sardi, J. C. O., Scorzoni, L., Bernardi, T., Fusco-Almeida, A. M., & Mendes Giannini, M. J. S. (2013) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/jmm.0.045054-0 · Cited by 1,184
Biosurfactants: potential applications in medicine
Rodrigues, L. R., Banat, I. M., Teixeira, J. A., & Oliveira, R. (2006) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkl024 · Cited by 923
The diploid genome sequence of Candida albicans
Jones, T., Federspiel, N. A., Chibana, H., Dungan, J. M., Kalman, S., Magee, B. B., Newport, G., Thorstenson, Y. R., Agabian, N. M., Magee, P. T., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0401648101 · Cited by 784
Mechanisms of Candida Biofilm Drug Resistance
Taff, H. T., Mitchell, K. F., Edward, J. A., & Andes, D. R. (2013) · Future Microbiology · doi:10.2217/fmb.13.101 · Cited by 422
Antifungal drug resistance among Candida species: mechanisms and clinical impact
Sanguinetti, M., Posteraro, B., & Lass‐Flörl, C. (2015) · Mycoses · doi:10.1111/myc.12330 · Cited by 394
Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis
Arendrup, M. C. (2010) · Current Opinion in Critical Care · doi:10.1097/mcc.0b013e32833e84d2 · Cited by 376
Adhesion of probiotic strains to the intestinal mucosa and interaction with pathogens
Servin, A. L., & Coconnier, M. H. (2003) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology · doi:10.1016/s1521-6918(03)00052-0 · Cited by 362
Probiotics: do they have a role in oral medicine and dentistry?
Meurman, J. H. (2005) · European Journal Of Oral Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0722.2005.00191.x · Cited by 351
Probiotics Reduce the Prevalence of Oral Candida in the Elderly—a Randomized Controlled Trial
Hatakka, K., Ahola, A. J., Yli‐Knuuttila, H., Richardson, M. D., Poussa, T. A., Meurman, J. H., & Korpela, R. (2007) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/154405910708600204 · Cited by 306
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adhesion mechanisms mediated by probiotics and prebiotics and their potential impact on human health
Monteagudo-Mera, A., Rastall, R. A., Gibson, G. R., Charalampopoulos, D., & Chatzifragkou, A. (2019) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-019-09978-7 · Cited by 743
Role of Lactic Acid Bacteria in Food Preservation and Safety
Zapaśnik, A., Sokołowska, B., & Bryła, M. (2022) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11091283 · Cited by 447
Exopolysaccharides as Antimicrobial Agents: Mechanism and Spectrum of Activity
Abdalla, A. K., Ayyash, M. M., Olaimat, A. N., Osaili, T. M., Al-Nabulsi, A. A., Shah, N. P., & Holley, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2021.664395 · Cited by 268
The Battle of Probiotics and Their Derivatives Against Biofilms
Barzegari, A., Kheyrolahzadeh, K., Hosseiniyan Khatibi, S. M., Sharifi, S., Memar, M. Y., & Zununi Vahed, S. (2020) · Infection and Drug Resistance · doi:10.2147/idr.s232982 · Cited by 263
A comprehensive review of the application of probiotics and postbiotics in oral health
Rad, A. H., Pourjafar, H., & Mirzakhani, E. (2023) · Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fcimb.2023.1120995 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Matsubara, V. H., Wang, Y., Bandara, H. M. H. N., Mayer, M. P. A., & Samaranayake, L. P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Yi
- Venue
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
- Published
- 2016-04-18
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 6415-6426
- ISSN
- 0175-7598 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0614
- OpenAlex
- W2341432746
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 23.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- other-oa
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Keywords
- probiotics, Lactobacillus, Candida albicans, biofilm formation, filamentation, cell adhesion, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus acidophilus, exometabolites, candidiasis, host colonization, antagonism
- MeSH terms
- Antibiosis, Candida albicans, Cell Adhesion, Culture Media, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Biofilms, Probiotics, Hyphae, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review