Cited by 394Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Antifungal drug resistance among Candida species: mechanisms and clinical impact

Open access
Sanguinetti, Maurizio, Posteraro, Brunella, Lass‐Flörl, Cornelia·2015·Mycoses

Abstract

The epidemiology of Candida infections has changed in recent years. Although Candida albicans is still the main cause of invasive candidiasis in most clinical settings, a substantial proportion of patients is now infected with non-albicans Candida species. The various Candida species vary in their susceptibility to the most commonly used antifungal agents, and the intrinsic resistance to antifungal therapy seen in some species, along with the development of acquired resistance during treatment in others, is becoming a major problem in the management of Candida infection. A better understanding of the mechanisms and clinical impact of antifungal drug resistance is essential for the efficient treatment of patients with Candida infection and for improving treatment outcomes. Herein, we report resistance to the azoles and echinocandins among Candida species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/myc.12330

Cites

133 of 133 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Species more tolerant to echinocandins include C. parapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, C. metapsilosis, C. guillerimondii, C. lipolytica, and C. fermentati.

    “Among the species more tolerant to echinocandins, besides C. parapsilosis, we can find C. orthopsilosis, C. metapsilosis, C. guillerimondii, C. lipolytica, and C. fermentati [33,34,35].”
  • C. glabrata and C. krusei have a naturally low susceptibility to azoles, while C. parapsilosis strains tend to have a lower susceptibility to echinocandins.

    “For instance, C. glabrata and C. krusei have a naturally low susceptibility to azoles, while C. parapsilosis strains tend to have a lower susceptibility to echinocandins [33].”
  • Species naturally more tolerant to azoles include C. glabrata, C. krusei, and less common species such as C. ciferrii, C. guilliermondii, C. inconspicua, C. humicola, C. lambica, C. lipolytica, C. norvegensis, C. palmioleophila, C. rugosa, and C. valida.

    “Species naturally more tolerant to azoles include the above mentioned C. glabrata and C. krusei, as well as a long list of less common species such as C. ciferrii, C. guilliermondii, C. inconspicua, C. humicola, C. lambica, C. lipolytica, C. norvegensis, C. palmioleophila, C. rugosa, and C. valida.”
  • In contrast to other species, azole resistance in C. glabrata is generally not associated with alteration in ERG11, but rather with mutations in the PDR1 transcription factor that cause differential expression of downstream targets.

    “In contrast to other species, azole resistance in C. glabrata is generally not associated with alteration in ERG11 [33,63,96,97], but rather with mutations in the PDR1 transcription factor, which cause the differential expression of downstream targets [97].”
  • 11.1%-58.3% of C. glabrata isolates resistant to echinocandins had cross resistance against fluconazole or other azoles.

    “As a result, 11.1%–58.3% of C. glabrata isolates resistant to echinocandins had cross resistance against fluconazole or other azoles [168,169,172]”

    From Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? (2017) · cites this paper as [172]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chow JK, Golan Y, Ruthazer R, et al. Factors associated with candi- demia caused by non-albicans Candida species versus Candida albicans in the intensive care unit. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1206-13.
  2. Lackner M, Tscherner M, Schaller M, et al. Position and numbers of FKS mutations in C. albicans selectively influence in vitro and in vivo susceptibility to echinocandin treatment. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58: 3626-35.
  3. Parmeland L, Gazon M, Guerin C, et al. Candida albicans and non- Candida albicans fungemia in an institutional hospital during a dec- ade. Med Mycol 2013; 51: 33-37. 122

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanguinetti, M., Posteraro, B., & Lass‐Flörl, C.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
Corresponding author
Posteraro, Brunella
Venue
Mycoses
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-29
Volume
58
Issue
S2
Pages
2-13
ISSN
  • 0027-5557 (ISSN-L)
  • 0933-7407
  • 1439-0507
OpenAlex
W1716405613
Cited by
394
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 3
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mycoses (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
antifungal resistance, Candida, Candida albicans, non-albicans Candida, invasive candidiasis, azole resistance, echinocandin resistance, acquired resistance, intrinsic resistance, antifungal susceptibility
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Azoles, Candida, Candidiasis, Humans, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Echinocandins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review