Cited by 220Plant tissue culture and regenerationEpigenetics and DNA MethylationPlant Genetic and Mutation Studies

Somaclonal variation in oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.): The DNA methylation hypothesis

Jaligot, E., Rival, A., Beulé, T., Dussert, S., Verdeil, J.-L.·2000·Plant Cell Reports

Abstract

Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) currently hampers the scaling-up of clonal plant production. In order to investigate the relationship between the "mantled" somaclonal variant and possible alterations in genomic DNA methylation rate, two complementary approaches have been used. HPLC quantification of relative amounts of 5-methyl-deoxycytidine has shown that global methylation in leaf DNA of abnormal regenerants is 0.5-2.5% lower than in their normal counterparts (20.8% vs 22%, respectively). When comparing nodular compact calli and fast growing calli, yielding respectively 5% and 100% of "mantled" plantlets, this decrease was up to 4.5% (from 23.2 to 18.7%). An alternative method, the SssI-methylase accepting assay, based on the enzymatic saturation of CG sites with methyl groups, gave convergent results. This work demonstrates that a correlation exists between DNA hypomethylation and the "mantled" somaclonal variation in oil palm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s002999900177

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In palm, fast growing calli generate almost 100% mantled plantlets, while nodular compact calli generate only 5% abnormal plants.

    “Jaligot et al. (2000) [116], which investigated DNA methylation levels in two different palm calli: fast growing (that generate almost 100% of ”mantled” plantlets—with abnormalities in their floral development, involving an apparent feminization of male parts in the flowers of both sexes), and nodular compact calli (that generate only 5% abnormal plants).”

    From Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants (2023) · cites this paper as Jaligot et al. (2000) [116]

  • There is a positive correlation between genomic DNA hypomethylation and abnormal in vitro clones regenerated from fast growing palm calli.

    “Using two different analysis methods (high-performance liquid chromatography—HPLC, and SssI-mediated reverse-dosage of CG-specific methylation) for assessing the methylation rates, the research team determined that there is a positive correlation between genomic DNA hypomethylation and abnormal in vitro clones regenerated from the fast growing calli.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaligot, E., Rival, A., Beulé, T., Dussert, S., & Verdeil, J.-L.
Affiliations
Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
Venue
Plant Cell Reports
Published
2000-06-13
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
684-690
ISSN
  • 0721-7714 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-203X
OpenAlex
W2153999292
Cited by
220
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Plant Cell Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
Keywords
somaclonal variation, oil palm, DNA methylation, DNA hypomethylation, 5-methyldeoxycytidine, callus, mosaicism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review